Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search

Drug therapy for CPPD in real clinical practice

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2026-12-14-17

Abstract

According to the recommendations of the ELUAR expert committee, the choice of drug therapy for calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD) is based on the clinical presentation (phenotype) of the disease. However, it is unknown whether this approach is implemented in real clinical practice. The aim of the study was to analyze the frequency of use of drugs prescribed for the treatment of CPPD in various phenotypes of the disease. Materials and methods. A total of 266 patients with CPPD over 18 years of age with clinical symptoms were examined. These patients were divided into phenotypes: recurrent acute arthritis, chronic arthritis, and osteoarthritis (OA) with calcium pyrophosphate (CPP) crystals. The frequency of prescription of colchicine, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, glucocorticoids (GCs), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was compared. Results. Based on phenotyping results, the group of patients with acute arthritis consisted of 40 patients (15 %), chronic arthritis – 157 (59 %), and OA with PFK crystals – 69 (26 %). The frequency of medications used to treat CPPD in all study participants (n=266): 207 patients (77.8 %) received NSAIDs, 97 (36.5 %) colchicine, 46 (17.3 %) hydroxychloroquine, 60 (22.6 %) methotrexate, and 34 (12.8 %) GCs. In acute arthritis, 30 patients (75 %) received NSAIDs, 5 (12.5 %) GCs, 17 (42.5 %) colchicine, 4 (10 %) hydroxychloroquine, and 8 (20 %) methotrexate. Patients with chronic arthritis: 123 (78.3 %) NSAIDs, 21 (13.4 %) – GCs, 58 (36.9 %) – colchicine, 29 (18.5 %) – hydroxychloroquine, 40 (25.5 %) – methotrexate. Patients with OA with CPP crystals: 54 (78.3 %) – NSAIDs, 8 (11.6 %) – GCs, 22 (31.9 %) – colchicine, 13 (18.8 %) – hydroxychloroquine, 12 (17.4 %) – methotrexate. Conclusions. The most commonly used medications for CPPD are NSAIDs and colchicine, with no significant differences in the frequency of prescription of individual medications across different disease phenotypes. The use of low-dose colchicine in CPPD appears to be the most appropriate.

About the Authors

M. S. Eliseev
V. A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Eliseev Maxim S., PhD Med Sci, head of Laboratory of Microcrystalline Arthritis.



M. N. Chikina
V. A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Chikina Maria N., PhD Med Sci, researcher at Laboratory of Microcrystalline Arthritis.



Yа. I. Kuzmina
V. A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology
Russian Federation

Kuzmina Yаnina I., junior researcher at Laboratory of Microcrystalline Arthritis.



References

1. Musacchio E., Ramonda R., Perissinotto E. The impact of knee and hip chondrocalcinosis on disability in older people: the ProVA study from northeastern Italy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 70 (11): 1937–1943. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2011.150508

2. Sirotti S., Jauffret C., Adinolfi A. et al. Pseudogout, chondrocalcinosis, CPPD et al: crystal clear… or clear as mud? – The time has come to reconsider the nomenclature of calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Ann Rheum Dis. 2025; 84 (8): 1287–1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.004

3. Zhang W., Doherty M., Bardin T. et al. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Part I: terminology and diagnosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 70 (4): 563–570. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.139105

4. Zhang W., Doherty M., Pascual E. et al. EULAR recommendations for calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Part II: management. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011; 70 (4): 571–575. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.139360

5. McCarty D. Pseudogout. In: Hollander JL, editor. Arthritis and Allied conditions: a textbook of rheumatology 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, 1966. P. 947–64.

6. Williams C. J., Rosenthal A. K. Pathogenesis of calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2021; 35 (4): 101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2021.101718

7. Eliseev M. S. ACR management guidelines for the treatment of gout: What’s new and what’s controversial. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2021; 59 (2): 129–133. https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2021-129-133

8. Karateev A. E., Lila A. M., Mazurov V. I. et al. Expert consensus 2024: rational use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Sovremennaya Revmatologiya. 2025; 19 (S 1): 1–40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2025-1S-1-40

9. Pascart T., Robinet P., Ottaviani S. et al. Evaluating the safety and short-term equivalence of colchicine versus prednisone in older patients with acute calcium pyrophosphate crystal arthritis (COLCHICORT): an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023; 5 (9): e523–e531. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(23)00165-0

10. Alvarellos A., Spilberg I. Colchicine prophylaxis in pseudogout. J Rheumatol. 1986; 13 (4): 804–805.

11. Chikina M. N., Eliseev M. S., Zhelyabina O. V. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of various anti-inflammatory drugs in urate-lowering therapy initiation in patients with gout (preliminary data). Sovremennaya Revmatologiya. 2021; 15 (2): 50–56. (In Russ.). https:// doi.org/10.14412/1996-7012-2021-2-50-56

12. Eliseev M. S., Chikina M. N., Zhelyabina O. V. et al. Efficacy and safety of long-term administration of various doses of colchicine in patients with gout. Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2025; 63 (2): 197–201. (In Russ.).https://doi.org/10.47360/1995-4484-2025-197-201

13. Tucker B., Tucker W. J., Chung J. S. et al. The efficacy and safety of low dose colchicine in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2026; 33 (5): 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf302

14. Boczar K. E., Pearson A. L., Hakimjavadi R. et al. Anti-inflammatory therapies to prevent cardiovascular events: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2026; 13: 1717817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1717817

15. Zhang W., Moskowitz R. W., Nuki G. et al. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, part I: critical appraisal of existing treatment guidelines and systematic review of current research evidence. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007; 15 (9): 981-1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2007.06.014

16. Kolasinski S. L., Neogi T., Hochberg M. C. et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/ Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (2): 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.41142

17. Singh A., Molina-Garcia P., Hussain S. et al. Efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention trials. Clin. Rheumatol. 2023; 42 (3): 889–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06402-w

18. Nidorf S. M., Fiolet A. T.L., Mosterd A. et al. Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Disease. N Engl. J. Med. 2020; 383 (19): 1838–1847. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2021372

19. Heijman M. W.J., Fiolet A. T.L., Mosterd A. et al. Association of Low-Dose Colchicine With Incidence of Knee and Hip Replacements: Exploratory Analyses From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2023; 176 (6): 737–742. https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-0289

20. Sirotti S, Terkeltaub R, Filippou G. Describing calcium pyrophosphate deposition: undoing the tower of Babel! Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2024; 36 (3): 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000001001

21.


Review

For citations:


Eliseev M.S., Chikina M.N., Kuzmina Y.I. Drug therapy for CPPD in real clinical practice. Medical alphabet. 2026;(12):14-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2026-12-14-17

Views: 67

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)