Histological evaluation of osteoregenerats after augmentation of extracted teeth sockets with osteoplastic material «Histograft» and during healing under a blood clot

   The aim of the study was to characterize the structure of newly formed bone tissue after implantation of the gene-activated osteoplastic material «Histograft».

   Materials and methods. The study included 20 patients diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (ICD-10: K04.5) who underwent tooth extraction with Subsequent socket augmentation with the osteoplastic material «Histograft.» Six months later, a bone fragment was collected from all patients during the second stage of dental implantation for subsequent morphological examination.

   Results. It was established that the gene-activated osteoplastic material «Histograft» integrates well into bone tissue and promotes the formation of pronounced bone regeneration. In the 1^st group (with the use of the material), the proportion of newly formed bone tissue was about 65 % of the area of the histological section, while in the 2^nd group (healing under the clot) it was about 50 %.

   Conclusion. The use of Histograft material for socket augmentation after tooth extraction ensures the formation of bone tissue necessary for subsequent dental implantation.

1. Avila-Ortiz G., Chambrone L., Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction : A systematic review and meta-analysis // Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2019. Vol. 46, Suppl. 21. P. 195–223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13057.

2. Mardas N., Trullenque-Eriksson A., MacBeth N. et al. Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes : a systematic review // Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2015. Vol. 26, Suppl. 11. P. 180–201. doi: 10.1111/clr.12639.

3. Bassir S.H., Alhareky M., Wangsrimongkol B. et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hard Tissue Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. 2018. Vol. 33, № 5. P. 979–994. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6399.

4. Molchanov N.A., Komlev V.S., Barinov S.M., et al. Synthetic osteoplastic material based on poly-3-hydroxybutyrate containing simvastatin for alveolar ridge bone tissue regeneration // Modern technologies in medicine. 2024. Vol. 16, No. 5. Pp. 36–45. doi: 10.17691/stm2024.16.5.04.

5. Sabantseva E.G., Golovina E.S., Komlev V.S. Biomaterials for preserving the alveolar ridge as a method of preparation for dental implantation // Clinical dentistry. 2023. No. 4. Pp. 56–63.

6. Gheno E., Bechara K., Dos Santos D.R. et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Socket Preservation Technique with Different Biomaterials after 6 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2025. Vol. 16, № 5. P. 189. doi: 10.3390/jfb16050189.

7. Lebedenko I.Yu., Stukalina Yu.V., Baron E.I. Maxillofacial surgery : a textbook for students of medical universities. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2017. 448 p.

8. Yaszemski M.J., Payne R.G., Hayes W.C. et al. Evolution of bone transplantation: Molecular, cellular and tissue strategies to engineer human bone // Biomaterials. 1996. Vol. 17, № 2. P. 175–185. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)85762-0.

9. Jelusic D., Zirk M.L., Fienitz T. et al. Monophasic ß-TCP vs. biphasic HA/ß-TCP in two-stage sinus floor augmentation procedures – a prospective randomized clinical trial // Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2017. Vol. 28, № 10. P. 1165–1173. doi: 10.1111/clr.12942.

10. Pereira R.S., Gorla L.F.O., Boos F.B.J.D. et al. Performance of Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Composite Granules in Critical-Size Calvarial Bone Defects in Rats // Polymers. 2021. Vol. 13, № 10. P. 1573. doi: 10.3390/polym13101573.

11. Bozo I. Ya., Deev R. V., Drobyshev A. Yu. Efficiency of gene-activated osteoplastic material based on octacalcium phosphate and plasmid DNA with the VEGF gene in filling “critical” bone defects // Genes and Cells. 2015. Vol. 10, No. 3. pp. 82–94.

12. Bozo I.Ya., Drobyshev A.Yu., Redko N.A., et al. Bone grafting of the jaws with gene-activated material: long-term results of clinical application // Dentistry. 2025. Vol. 104, No. 6-2. pp. 56–63. doi: 10.17116/stomat202510406256.

13. Gurin A.N., Komlev V.S. Octacalcium phosphate – a precursor of biological mineralization, a promising osteoplastic material // Russian Dental Journal. 2010. No. 4. pp. 41–46.

14. Gurin A.N. Comparative assessment of the effect of various osteoplastic materials based on calcium phosphates on the healing of bone defects : diss. … Cand. of Medicine. Moscow, 2009. 183 p.

15. Kawai T., Anada T., Honda Y. et al. Synthetic octacalcium phosphate augments bone regeneration correlated with its content in collagen scaffold // Tissue Engineering Part A. 2009. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 23–32. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0141

16. Deev R.V., Bozo I.Ya., Mzhavanadze N.D., et al. Gene-activated biomaterials in regenerative medicine // Bulletin of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2014. Vol. 16, No. 2. pp. 93–108. doi: 10.15825/1995-1191-2014-2-93-108.

17. Tarasenko S.V., Gor I.A., Dyachkova E.Yu., Kazaryan A.A. Evaluation of the use of histograph material in socket augmentation surgery based on histology data. A clinical case // Problemy stomatologii. 2024. No. 4. pp. 139–143. DOI: 10.18481/2077-7566-2024-20-4-139-143.

18. Mavlikeev M.O., Arkhipova S.S., Chernova O.N., et al. A short course in histological technique : a teaching aid / edited by R.V. Deev. Kazan: Kazan University Press, 2020. 72 p.

19. Gurin A.N., Komlev V.S., Fadeeva I.V., et al. Subantral augmentation using domestic synthetic biomaterials based on tricalcium phosphate // Russian Dentistry. 2015. Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 20–26.

20. Jambhekar S., Kernen F., Bidra A.S. Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction : a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials // Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2015. Vol. 113, № 5. P. 371–382. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.009.

21. Mardas N., Chadha V., Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial // Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2010. Vol. 21, № 7. P. 688–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x.

22. Corbella S., Galli C., Naclério-Homem M.G. et al. Systematic review on the use of platelet-rich concentrates in alveolar socket preservation: Meta-analysis // Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2025. Vol. 126, № 1. P. 101703. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101703.

23. Willenbacher M., Al-Nawas B., Berres M. et al. The effects of alveolar ridge preservation: a meta-analysis // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2016. Vol. 18, № 6. P. 1248–1268. doi: 10.1111/cid.12364.

24. Falacho R.I., Correia A., Moreira J. et al. Socket Preservation after Tooth Extraction: Particulate Autogenous Bone Mixed with Plasma Rich in Growth Factors in Comparison with Porcine-Derived Xenograft: A Retrospective Clinical Study // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2023. Vol. 81, № 7. P. 811–821. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2023.03.004.

25. Kim J.-W., Choi K.-H., Yun J.-H. et al. Bone regeneration of biphasic calcium phosphate composites with different ratios of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate in rabbit calvarial defects // Biomaterials Research. 2025. Vol. 29. P. 0017. doi: 10.1186/s40824-025-00527-2.

26. Zhang Y., Liu X., Zeng L. et al. Polymer fiber scaffolds for bone and cartilage tissue engineering // Advanced Functional Materials. 2019. Vol. 29, № 36. P. 1903279. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201903279.