Buy (150 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Ultrasound diagnostics of left ventricular hypertrophy: once more about the indexation of myocardial mass
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-22-44-49
Abstract
We provided historical aspects and some features of different ultrasound diagnostic methods of left ventricular hypertrophy, their advantages and disadvantages. Using some methods of statistical analysis, we tried to assess the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and consistency of the two most commonly used methods of left ventricular mass indexations (to the body surface area and to the height 2.7) among patients with different body mass indexes. According to our results, among patients with body mass index less than 25.0 kg/m2, both left ventricular myocardial mass indexations have good consistency with each other and can be effectively used in the diagnostic of left ventricular hypertrophy. Fairly good consistency between the studied criteria among patients with a body mass index of 25.0–29.9 also, theoretically, allows to use both methods of indexation for the diagnosing of this pathology. According to the poor consistency of the studied criteria, in case of body mass index more than 30.0 kg/m2, left ventricular myocardial mass indexation to height 2,7 should be used only.
About the Authors
S. N. Bogomolov
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. N. Solntsev
Almazov Federal Medical Research Centrer
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. N. Kulikov
Pavlov Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. N. Kuchmin
Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Kalbfleisch, J. D. Competing risks: the statistical analysis of failure time data / J. D. Kalbfleisch, R. L. Prentice. — New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980. — P. 163–188.
2. Oikarinen, L. Electrocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy with time-voltage QRS and QRST-wave areas / L. Oikarinen, M. Karvonen // J. Hum Hypertens. — 2004. — Vol. 18, № 1. — Р. 33–40. doi:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001631
3. Devereux R. B. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy as a surrogate end-point for morbid events in hypertension treatment trials / R. B. Devereux, E. Agabiti- Rosei, B. Dahlof // J. Hypertens. Suppl. — 1996. — Vol. 14, № 2. — S95-S101.
4. Koren, M. J. Changes in left ventricular mass predict risk in essential hypertension / M. J. Koren, D. D. Savage, P. N. Casale // Circulation. — 1990. — Vol. 82; suppl.11. — P. 29.
5. Levy D. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study / D. Levy, R. J. Garrison, D. D. Savage // N. Engl. J. Med. — 1990. — Vol. 322. — P. 1561–1566. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199005313222203
6. Лившиц А. М. Классификация и критерии гипертрофии сердца по данным раздельного взвешивания его частей / А. М. Лившиц // Архив патологии. — 1981. — Т. 43, № 6. — С. 24–30.
7. Bove K. E. Observations on the assessment of cardiac hypertrophy utilizing a chamber partition technique / K. E. Bove, D. T. Rowlands, R. C. Scott // Circulation. — 1966. — Vol. 33 — Р. 558–568. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.33.4.558
8. Casale, P. N. Improved sex–specific criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy for clinical and computer interpretation of electrocardiograms: validation with autopsy findings / P. N. Casale, R. B. Devereux, D. R. Alonso // Circulation. — 1987. — Vol. 75, № 3 — Р. 565–572. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.75.3.565
9. Troy B. L. Measurement of left ventricular wall thickness and mass by echocardiography / B. L. Troy, J. Pombo, C. E. Rackley // Circulation. — 1972. — Vol. 45. — P. 602–611. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.45.3.602
10. Devereux R. B. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: Anatomic validation of the method / Devereux R. B., Reichek N. // Circulation. — 1977. — Vol. 55. P. 613–618. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.55.4.613
11. Devereux R. B. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings / R. B. Devereux, D. R. Alonso, E. M. Lutas // Am. J. Cardiol. — 1986. — Vol. 47. — P. 450–458. doi.org/10.1016/0002–9149(86)90771-X
12. Park S. H. Two-dimensional echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular mass as recommended by the American Society of Echocardiography: correlation with autopsy and M-mode echocardiography / S. H. Park, C. Shub, T. P. Nobrega // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. — 1996. — Vol. 9. — P. 119–128. PMID: 8849607
13. Reichek, N. Left ventricular hypertrophy: relation of anatomic, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic findings / N. Reichek, R. B. Devereux // Circulation. — 1981. — Vol. 63. — P. 1391–1398.
14. Antoniucci, D. Prevalence and correlates of echocardiographic determined left ventricular hypertrophy in 2318 asymptomatic middle-aged men: the ECCIS project. Epidemiolgia e Clinica della Cardiopatia Ischemica Silente / D. Antoniucci, F. Seccareccia, A. Menotti // J. Ital. Cardiology. — 1997. — Vol. 27, № 4. — P. 363–369.
15. De Simone, G. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and of their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk / G. De Simone, R. B. Devereux, S. R. Daniels // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. — 1995. — Vol. 25. — P. 1056–1062.
16. Chirinos, J. A. Left ventricular mass: allometric scaling, normative values, effect of obesity, and prognostic performance / J. A. Chirinos [et al.] // Hypertension. — 2010. — Vol. 56. — P. 91–98.
17. Armstrong A.C. LV mass assessed by echocardiography and CMR, cardiovascular outcomes, and medical practice / A. C. Armstrong, S. Gidding, O. Gjesdal, C. Wu et al. // JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. — 2012. — Vol. 5. — P. 837–848.
18. Mor- Avi V. Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging / V. Mor- Avi, L. Sugeng, L. Weinert // Circulation. — 2004. — Vol. 110, № 13. — P. 1814–1818. doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000142670.65971.5F
19. Celebi A. S. Current cardiac imaging techniques for detection of left ventricular mass / A. S. Celebi, H. Yalcin, F. Yalcin // Cardiovasc. Ultrasound. — 2010. — Vol. 8. — P. 19. doi: 10.1186/1476–7120–8–19.
20. Lang R. M. Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging / R. M. Lang, L. P. Badano, V. Mor- Avi, et al. // J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. — 2015. — Vol. 28, № 1. — P. 1–39. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003.
21. Chahal N. S. Ethnicity- related differences in left ventricular function, structure and geometry: a population study of UK Indian Asian and European white subjects / N. S. Chahal [et al.] // Heart. — 2010. — Vol. 96. — P. 466–471.
22. Kizer, J. R. Differences in left ventricular structure between black and white hypertensive adults: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study / J. R. Kizer [et al.] // Hypertension. — 2004. — Vol. 43. — P. 1182–1188.
23. Lauer, M. S. Sex-specific reference M-mode values in adults: population- derived values with consideration of the impact of height / M. S. Lauer, M. G. Larson, D. Levy // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. — 1995. — Vol. 26. — P. 1039–1046.
24. Mosteller, R. D. Simplified calculation of body-surface area / R. D. Mosteller // N. Engl. J. Med. — 1987. — Vol. 317, № 17. — Р. 1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198710223171717
25. Williams B. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) / B. Williams, G. Mancia, W. Spiering, et al. // European Heart Journal. — 2018. — Vol. 00, — P. 1–98, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339.
26. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. 1997, Geneva: WHO.
27. Linfооt E. H. An Informational Measure of Correlation / E. H. Linfoot // Information and Control, 1957. — Vol. 1, № 1. — P. 85–89.
Review
For citations:
Bogomolov S.N., Solntsev V.N., Kulikov A.N., Kuchmin A.N. Ultrasound diagnostics of left ventricular hypertrophy: once more about the indexation of myocardial mass. Medical alphabet. 2023;1(22):44-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-22-44-49
Views:
667
Email this article 