Evaluation of the diagnostic value of automated hematopoietic stem cell counting
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2026-7-70-74
Abstract
Background. The article presents the results of a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of automated and manual (microscopic) methods for counting hematopoietic stem cells in peripheral blood and leukocyte concentrate samples.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of automated counting of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in various types of biomaterial (peripheral blood, leukapheresis product) of patients undergoing the procedure of mobilization and collection of HSC at the clinic of the R.M. Gorbacheva Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantology in the period 2018–2019.
Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 98 patients was conducted. A total of 278 valid observations were analyzed: 172 peripheral blood samples and 106 leukapheresis product samples. The study compared two methods for leukocyte (WBC) quantification: automated counting on a Sysmex XN‑1000 hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Japan) and manual microscopic counting in a Goryaev chamber. Statistical analysis of the obtained data was performed using the Python programming language (version 3.9.6). Quantitative indicators are presented as median and interquartile range (Me [Q1; Q3]).
Results. The study found that the implementation of automated hematopoietic progenitor cell counting (HPC parameter) on the Sysmex XN‑1000 platform has fundamentally changed the paradigm of leukapheresis laboratory support. The key advantage of this technology is the ability to standardize monitoring, eliminating the variability inherent in manual methods. Statistical analysis demonstrated the need to abandon the traditional leukocyte counting in the Goryaev chamber.
Conclusions. The HPC parameter on the Sysmex XN‑1000 platform has proven itself as a precision tool for optimizing diagnostic testing and ensuring the timely procurement of high‑quality transplants. Given the method’s proven reliability, the next stage of the study will aim to verify it against the reference method (flow fluorescence cytometry of CD34+ cells) for the final validation of the developed diagnostic algorithms.
About the Authors
M. A. GorodnovaRussian Federation
Gorodnova Marina A., head of Laboratory Diagnostics Center
Saint Petersburg
P. S. Kuga
Russian Federation
Kuga Polina S., PhD Med Sci, transfusion specialist at R. M. Gorbacheva Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Transplantology
Saint Petersburg
O. V. Pirogova
Russian Federation
Pirogova Olga V., PhD Med Sci, hematologist at R. M. Gorbacheva Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Transplantology
Saint Petersburg
A. V. Lugovaya
Russian Federation
Lugovaya Anna V., PhD Med Sci, associate professor, senior researcher and clinical laboratory diagnostics physician at Dept of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics with a Course in Molecular Medicine
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Kulagin A.D., Lisukov I.A., Kozlov A.V., et al. Recommendations for the procurement and transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells. Clinical oncohematology. 2015; 8 (2): 154–162. (In Russ.).
2. Dolgov V.V., Menshikov V.V. Clinical laboratory diagnostics: national guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR Media; 2016. (In Russ.).
3. Morkis IVC, Farias MG, Scotti L. Determination of hematopoietic progenitor cells using automated blood cell analyzer: a review. Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 2015; 37 (4): 267–272.
4. Grommé M, Russcher H, Braakman E, et al. Multicenter study to evaluate a new enumeration method for hematopoietic stem cell collection management. Int J Lab Hematol. 2017; 39 (4): 420–427.
5. Seo JY, Lee ST, Kim SH. Evaluation of the low white blood cell mode on the Sysmex XN automated hematology analyzer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2015; 29 (6): 452–458.
6. Tanosaki R, Kumazawa T, Yoshida A, et al. Novel and rapid enumeration method of peripheral blood stem cells using automated hematology analyzer. Int J Lab Hematol. 2014; 36 (5): 521–530.
7. Jones AS, Twomey C, Molloy AM. Automated hematopoietic progenitor cell enumeration: a new era in apheresis monitoring. ClinLabHaem. 2015; 37 (2): 112–119.
8. Park SH, Park CJ, Kim MJ, et al. The New Sysmex XN 2000 Automated Blood Cell Analyzer More Accurately Measures HPC Than XE 2100. AnnLabMed. 2015; 35 (1): 146–148.
9. Peerschke EI, Moung C, Pessin MS, Maslak P. Evaluation of new automated hematopoietic progenitor cell analysis in the clinical management of peripheral blood stem cell collections. Transfusion. 2015; 55 (8): 2001–2009.
10. Storch E, Mark T, Avecilla S, et al. A novel hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization and collection algorithm based on preemptive CD34 enumeration. Transfusion. 2015; 55 (8): 1992–2000.
11. Danishyan K.L., Galstyan G.M., Kostina I.E. The role of laboratory markers in predicting the effectiveness of stem cell collection in patients with multiple myeloma. Laboratory Service. 2019; 8 (2): 45–51. (In Russ.).
12. Pavlova A.A., Fast G.A., Kuzmina L.A., et al. Monitoring CD34+ cells in peripheral blood to determine the optimal time to start leukapheresis. Hematology and Transplantology. 2017; 62 (3): 112–118. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Gorodnova M.A., Kuga P.S., Pirogova O.V., Lugovaya A.V. Evaluation of the diagnostic value of automated hematopoietic stem cell counting. Medical alphabet. 2026;(7):70-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2026-7-70-74
JATS XML
























