Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search

Protective impact of bone grafting interventions on early osseointegration and the risk of early biological loss of dental implants according to the IDENT system (2018–2025). A retrospective cohort study

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2026-10-58-61

Abstract

   Objective. To assess the association between bone grafting procedures in the implant site and the incidence of early biological loss of dental implants (1.5–3 month window) based on data from the electronic clinical system IDENT for 2018–2025.

   Materials and мethods. Retrospective cohort study: 8203 patients, 24,975 implants. Exposure – presence of bone grafting (any type) at the time of implant placement; outcome – early biological implant loss within the interval of 1.5–3 months. All 574 events of early loss were included in the analysis. Frequencies were compared using 2×2 tables with calculation of RR and OR (95 % CI) and the χ² test.

   Results. Early loss with bone grafting was 1.15 % (97/8435) versus 2.88 % (477/16540) without bone grafting: RR = 0.40 (95 % CI 0.32–0.50), OR = 00.39 (95 % CI 0.31–0.49), p < 0.001. Absolute risk reduction – 1.73 p. p., NNT ≈ 58.

   Conclusion. Bone grafting procedures are associated with a lower incidence of early biological implant loss. Causal interpretation is limited by the retrospective design and incomplete covariates; standard errors were estimated with a correction for patient-level clustering.

About the Authors

R. U. Bersanov
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science «Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences» (CRI RAS); Chechen State University named after A.A. Kadyrov (CSU); Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic
Russian Federation

Ruslan U. Bersanov, Head of the Department, Chief Research Fellow, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor

Department of General Dentistry; Medical Research Department

Grozny

AuthorID: 775528



M. R. Bersanova
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science «Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences» (CRI RAS); Chechen State University named after A.A. Kadyrov (CSU)
Russian Federation

Makka R. Bersanova, Assistant Professor, Research Fellow, Candidate of Medical Sciences

Department of General Dentistry; Medical Research Department

Grozny

AuthorID: 1307695



G. G. Ibragimov
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science «Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences» (CRI RAS); Chechen State University named after A.A. Kadyrov (CSU)
Russian Federation

Ginaz G. Ibragimov, Postgraduate Student, Junior Research Fellow

Department of General Dentistry; Medical Research Department

Grozny

AuthorID: 1308131



S. M. Mammedov
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science «Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences» (CRI RAS); Chechen State University named after A.A. Kadyrov (CSU)
Russian Federation

Serdar M. Mammedov, Postgraduate Student, Junior Research Fellow

Department of General Dentistry; Medical Research Department

Grozny

AuthorID: 1285416



F.-L. S. Takaeva
Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science «Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov of the Russian Academy of Sciences» (CRI RAS); Chechen State University named after A.A. Kadyrov (CSU)
Russian Federation

Fatimat-Layuza S. Takaeva, Postgraduate Student, Junior Research Fellow

Department of General Dentistry; Medical Research Department

Grozny

AuthorID: 1321862



S. A. Ferzauli
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumbi
Russian Federation

Sulim A. Ferzauli, student

Moscow



References

1. Albrektsson T., Wennerberg A. On osseointegration in relation to implant surfaces // Clinical implant dentistry and related research. – 2019. – V. 21. – P. 4–7. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12742.

2. Honda J. et al. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw-retained zirconia-based molar restorations // Clinical Oral Implants Research. – 2017. – V. 28. – № 9. – P. 1119–1126. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12957.

3. Chrcanovic B. R. et al. Analysis of risk factors for cluster behavior of dental implant failures // Clinical implant dentistry and related research. – 2017. – V. 19. – № 4. – P. 632–642. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12485.

4. Coelho T. R. C. et al. Evaluation of the association of early implant failure with local, environmental, and systemic factors: A retrospective study // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2021. – V. 79. – №. 6. – P. 1237–1245. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.01.027.

5. Esposito M. et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: antibiotics at dental implant placement to prevent complications // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. – 1996. – V. 2019. – № 10. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004152.pub4.

6. Findler M. et al. Clinical Success Rates of Dental Implants with Bone Grafting in a Large-Scale National Dataset // Journal of Functional Biomaterials. – 2026. – V. 17. – № 1. – P. 46. DOI: 10.3390/jfb17010046.

7. Honda J. et al. Fracture resistance of implant-supported screw-retained zirconia-based molar restorations // Clinical Oral Implants Research. – 2017. – V. 28. – № 9. – P. 1119–1126. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12926.

8. Krisam J. et al. Factors affecting the early failure of implants placed in a dental practice with a specialization in implantology – a retrospective study // BMC Oral Health. – 2019. – V. 19. – № 1. – P. 208. DOI:10.1186/s12903-019-0828-6.

9. Rokaya D. et al. Peri-implantitis update: risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment // European journal of dentistry. – 2020. – V. 14. – № 04. – P. 672–682. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11020192.

10. Rokaya D. et al. Peri-implantitis update: risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment // European journal of dentistry. – 2020. – V. 14. – № 04. – P. 672-682. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.17-0588.

11. Rokaya D. et al. Peri-implantitis update: risk indicators, diagnosis, and treatment // European journal of dentistry. – 2020. – V. 14. – №. 04. – P. 672–682. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715772.

12. Thiebot N. et al. Implant failure rate and the prevalence of associated risk factors: a 6-year retrospective observational survey // Journal of Oral Medicine and Oral Surgery. – 2022. – V. 28. – № 2. – P. 19. DOI: 10.1051/mbcb/2021045.

13. Vinhas A. S. et al. Review of the mechanical behavior of different implant–abutment connections // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. – 2020. – V. 17. – № 22. – P. 8685. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17228685.

14. Wåhlberg R. D. et al. A multicenter study of factors related to early implant failures – part 2: patient factors // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. – 2025. – V. 27. – №. 4. – P. e70081. DOI: 10.1111/cid.70015.

15. Walia M. S. et al. Removal of fractured dental implant screw using a new technique: a case report // Journal of Oral Implantology. – 2012. – V. 38. – № 6. – P. 747–750. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00195.

16. Wu X. et al. The risk factors of early implant failure: A retrospective study of 6113 implants // Clinical implant dentistry and related research. – 2021. – V. 23. – № 3. – P. 280–288. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12992.

17. Yari A. et al. Risk factors associated with early implant failure : A retrospective review // Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2024. – V. 125. – № 4. – P. 101749. DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101749.

18. Bersanova M.R. et al. Stress-strain state of protective structures on implants during replacement of a dental defect// Russian Dental Journal. – 2024. – V. 28. – № 4. – P. 432–438. DOI: 10.17816/dent629415.

19. Bordina G.E. Comparative characteristics of the chemical structure of hormokers and traditional composites/G.E. Bordina, N.P. Lopina, A.A. Andreev // Russian Dental Journal. – 2022. – V. 26, NO. 6. – P. 503–512. – DOI: 10.17816/dent112378. – EDN: UWXFWP.

20. Guskov A.V., Oleinikov A.A., Domashkevich N.S., Osman A. Possibilities and prospects of experimental and clinical hardware methods for determining the primary stability of dental implants in a comparative analysis. Dentistry. 2022;101(1):96–102. DOI: 10.17116/stomat202210101196.

21. Losev FF, Brailovskaya TV, Kotik M.S. Structural complications in dental implantology (using the example of clinical cases). Dentistry. 2024;103(3):50–55. DOI: 10.17116/stomat202410303150.

22. Mayborodin I.V., Sarkisyants B.K., Sheplev B.V., Mayborodina V.I., Shevela A.A. Gingival ossification over the intraosseous implant. Pathology Archive. 2024;86(6):70–73. DOI: 10.17816/KMJ640899.

23. Skapkareva V.O., Latyushina L.S., Malysheva L.Yu. Assessment of immuno-morphological parameters of the local focus of chronic periapical inflammation during dental intraosseous implantation // Dental problems. 2024. № 3. P. 111-116. doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-2024-20-3-111-116.

24. Takaeva F.-L.S., Bersanov R.U., Mammedov S.M. et al. Influence of osteotomy window localization on sinus-lifting results: analysis of anatomical and clinical factors. Physician, 2026;(1):84–87. doi: 10.29296/25877305-2026-01-18.

25. Tarasenko S.V., Zagorsky S.V. Overview of methods and materials used to increase gum volume // Clinical practice. 2019. № 1.


Review

For citations:


Bersanov R.U., Bersanova M.R., Ibragimov G.G., Mammedov S.M., Takaeva F.S., Ferzauli S.A. Protective impact of bone grafting interventions on early osseointegration and the risk of early biological loss of dental implants according to the IDENT system (2018–2025). A retrospective cohort study. Medical alphabet. 2026;(10):58-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2026-10-58-61

Views: 90

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)