Clinical semiotics of immune‑related dermatological adverse events in cancer patients receiving PD‑1/PD‑L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors: data from outpatient oncology practice
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-23-51-57
Abstract
Introduction. Malignant neoplasms remain one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, contributing to the increasing number of patients requiring systemic anticancer therapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been a breakthrough in oncology, significantly improving survival in several malignancies. However, their use is associated with the development of immune‑related adverse events (irAEs), among which immune‑related dermatologic adverse events (irDAEs) are the most common.
Objective. To research the clinical features of immune-related dermatologic adverse events in patients receiving immunotherapy at Moscow State Budgetary Healthcare Institution «Oncological Center No.1 of Moscow City Hospital named after S.S. Yudin, Moscow Healthcare Department»
Materials and methods. A prospective, single‑center study included 171 patients who received therapy with PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, prolgolimab, atezolizumab, avelumab) during the period 2023–2025 at Oncology Center No. 1, S.S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital, Moscow. The study focused on immune-related dermatologic adverse events (irDAEs) associated with anticancer immunotherapy in oncology patients, with an emphasis on identifying their clinical characteristics. The classification of irDAEs was based on clinical presentation and dermatoscopic findings. Data collection was performed using MS Excel 2019, and statistical analysis was carried out using StatTech v.4.8.11.
Results. The study included 171 patients (57.3% male, mean age 67.2 years). The most common primary malignancies were skin and soft tissue cancers (35.1%) and genitourinary cancers (32.2%). A wide spectrum of immune‑related dermatologic adverse events was identified during therapy. The most frequently observed events were maculopapular rash (31%), isolated pruritus (20.5%), and psoriasiform eruptions (17%). Less commonly, exacerbation of pre‑existing psoriasis (12.9%), lichenoid eruptions (9.9%), vitiligo (4.1%), and bullous pemphigoid (4.1%) were recorded. The rarest manifestations included erythema nodosum (2.3%) and scleroderma‑like reactions (2.3%).
Conclusion. Immune‑related dermatologic adverse events during PD‑1/PD‑L1 inhibitor therapy range from early manifestations, such as maculopapular rash and pruritus, to rare but severe conditions, including bullous pemphigoid and scleroderma‑like reactions. Timely diagnosis and appropriate management are essential to maintain patients’ quality of life and ensure the continuity of anticancer immunotherapy.
About the Authors
A. Yu. SyrysevaRussian Federation
Syryseva Anastasia Yu., postgraduate student at Dept of Physiology and
Pathology of the Faculty of Fundamental Medicine; dermatovenerologist
Moscow
E. A. Shatokhina
Russian Federation
Shatokhina Evgeniya A., DM Sci (habil.), professor at Dept of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology2, leading researcher at Dept of Internal Diseases
Moscow
N. V. Danilova
Russian Federation
Danilova Natalia V., DM Sci (habil.), senior researcher at Dept of Clinical Pathology, pathologist
Moscow
A. S. Polonskaya
Russian Federation
Polonskaya Alexandra S., PhD Med, associate professor at Dept of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology
Moscow
L. S. Kruglova
Russian Federation
Kruglova Larisa S., DM Sci (habil.), professor, head of Dept of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, vice-rector for Academic Affairs
Moscow
T. G. Antonova
Russian Federation
Antonova Tatyana G., PhD Med, head of Day Hospital Dept of Antitumor and Drug Therapy
Moscow
M. M. Sobolev
Russian Federation
Sobolev Maxim M., oncologist-chemotherapist
Moscow
I. A. Pokataev
Russian Federation
Pokataev Ilya A., DM Sci (habil.), head of the Chemotherapeutic Treatment
Service
Moscow
References
1. Siegel RL, Kratzer TB, Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2025. CA Cancer J Clin. 2025;75(1):10–45. DOI:10.3322/caac.21871
2. Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2023 (incidence and mortality) / edited by A.D. Kaprin [et al.] – M.: P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2024. ill. 276 p. (In Russ.). ISBN978-5-85502-298-8
3. Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(2):158–168. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481.
4. Shatokhina E.A., Polonskaya A.S., Kruglova L.S., Shatokhin M.N. Dermatological adverse events of antitumor immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies to PD 1 and PD L1. Immunology. 2021; 42 (6): 641–654. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33029/0206-4952-2021-42-6-641-654
5. Reschke R, Deitert B, Enk AH, Hassel JC. The role of tissue resident memory T cells as mediators for response and toxicity in immunotherapy treated melanoma two sides of the same coin?. Front Immunol. 2024; 15: 1385781. Published 2024 Mar 18. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1385781
6. Teng YS, Yu S. Molecular Mechanisms of Cutaneous Immune Related Adverse Events (irAEs) Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(7):6805–6819. Published 2023 Jul 18. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070498
7. Vaez Gharamaleki Y, Akbarzadeh MA, Jadidi Niaragh F, Mahmoodpoor A, Sanaie S, Hosseini MS. Dermatologic toxicities related to cancer immunotherapy. Toxicol Rep. 2025;14:102021. Published 2025 Apr 5. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.102021
8. Sibaud V. Dermatologic Reactions to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Skin Toxicities and Immunotherapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19(3):345–361. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-017-0336-3.
9. Dermatological adverse events of antitumor therapy: a guide for physicians / E.A. Shatokhina, L.S. Kruglova, A.V. Michenko, A.S. Polonskaya. Moscow: GEOTAR Media, 2025. 464 p. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33029/9704–9319–9-DAE-2025-1-464. SBN978-5-9704-9319-9
10. Cao T, Zhou X, Wu X, Zou Y. Cutaneous immune related adverse events to immune checkpoint inhibitors: from underlying immunological mechanisms to multi omics prediction. Front Immunol. 2023; 14: 1207544. Published 2023 Jun 22. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1207544
11. Coleman EL, Olamiju B, Leventhal JS. The life threatening eruptions of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Clin Dermatol. 2020; 38 (1): 94–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.10.015
12. Syryseva A. Yu., Shatokhina E. A., Polonskaya A. S., Kruglova L. S., Pokataev I. A., Galkin V.N. Immune mediated dermatological adverse events of antitumor immunotherapy with PD 1, PD L1, CTLA 4 inhibitors // Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2024. Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 121–133. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/dv623303
13. Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C, et al. Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow up. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28 (suppl_4): iv119 iv142. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx225
14. Esen BH, Özbek L, Oğuz S, Selçukbiricik F. Characterizing immune checkpoint inhibitor related cutaneous adverse reactions: A comprehensive analysis of FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Heliyon. 2024; 10 (13): e33765. Published 2024 Jul 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33765
Review
For citations:
Syryseva A.Yu., Shatokhina E.A., Danilova N.V., Polonskaya A.S., Kruglova L.S., Antonova T.G., Sobolev M.M., Pokataev I.A. Clinical semiotics of immune‑related dermatological adverse events in cancer patients receiving PD‑1/PD‑L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors: data from outpatient oncology practice. Medical alphabet. 2025;1(23):51-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-23-51-57
























