Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia (one centre experience of 150 operations)

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-13-24-27

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the perioperative period and results of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) in patients with achalasia.

Material and methods. During the period 2017–2023, POEM was performed in 150 patients aged 15 to 80 years (mean age 53 ± 15,4 years) (94 women, 56 men). The duration of the disease ranged from 6 months to 40 years (mean value 5,8 ± 6,67 years). The average dysphagia value according to the Eckadt scale before surgery was 11.12±0.75.

Results. Technical difficulties with tunnel formation due to the presence of fibrosis of varying severity were noted in 24 (16.1 %) patients. The presence of fibrosis resulted in a slight increase in the duration of the intervention at the tunnel formation stage 85.0 (80.0; 120.0) minutes versus 95 (80.0; 120.0) (p=0.87554). Adverse events during the procedure were observed in 5 (3.33 %) patients: no differences were noted between patients with stages II–III and IV of the disease (3 versus 2) (p=0.22). No differences were found in the frequency of complications between patients with or without fibrosis in the submucosal layer (p=0.1922). Oral food and fluid intake were restored in all patients. The Eckadt scale score ranged from 0 to 4 (mean 1.48±0.98). There was no statistically significant difference in the frequency of esophagitis in patients with stages II–III of the disease and stage IV (26 versus 5) (p=0.49).

Conclusion. POEM in patients with esophageal achalasia is an effective intervention, regardless of the stage of the disease with a low frequency of intraand postoperative complications. Previous treatment is not a predictor of the occurrence of fibrosis in the submucosal layer, does not affect the frequency of intraoperative complications and does not significantly increase the duration of the intervention. The stage of the disease does not affect the frequency of intraoperative complications and erosive esophagitis.

About the Authors

E. A. Drobyazgin
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

 Drobyazgin Evgeny A., DM Sci (habil.), associate professor, professor at Dept of Hospital and Pediatric Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine, Novosibirsk State Medical University, head of Endoscopy Dept, thoracic surgeon at Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital

Новосибирск



Yu. V. Chikinev
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Chikinev Yuri V., DM Sci (habil.), professor, head of Dept of Hospital and Pediatric Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine, Novosibirsk State Medical University, thoracic surgeon of Dept of Thoracic Surgery, Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital

Новосибирск

 



N. I. Mit’ko
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Mitko Nikita I., surgeon, applicant for a degree at Dept of Hospital and Pediatric Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine

Новосибирск



M. F. Osipenko
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Osipenko Marina F., DM Sci (habil.), professor, head of Dept of Internal Medicine Propaedeutics; head of Dept of Organization and Coordination of Dissertation and Academic Councils

Новосибирск



A. V. Korobeinikov
Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Korobaynikov Alexander V., head of Dept of Thoracic Surgery

Новосибирск



A. S. Poliakevich
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Polyakevich Alexey S., DM Sci (habil.), associate professor at Dept of Hospital and Pediatric Surgery of the Faculty of Medicine, Novosibirsk State Medical University, surgeon, Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital

Новосибирск



I. V. Peshkova
Novosibirsk State Medical University; Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Peshkova Inessa V., DM Sci (habil.), associate professor at Dept of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, Novosibirsk State Medical University, anesthesiologist-resuscitator, Novosibirsk State Regional Clinical Hospital

Новосибирск



S. G. Shtofin
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Shtofin Sergey G., DM Sci (habil.), professor, head of Dept of General Surgery

Новосибирск



References

1. Gabriel SA, Dynko VYu, Bespechny MV, Guchetl AYa, Tlekhuray RM. Clinical efficiency of POEM operation in patients with achalasia of cardias. Innovative Medicine of Kuban. 2020; 17 (1): 52–55. (InRuss.). DOI: 10.35401/2500-0268-2020-17-1-52-55

2. Kaibysheva VO, Nikonov EL, Plakhov RV, Fedorov ED, Shapovalyants SG. Comparison of the modern treatment methods for esophageal achalasia. Russian Journal of Evidence-based Gastroenterology = Dokazatel’nayagastroenterologiya. 2019; 8 (4–5): 44–60. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/dokgastro2019804–05144

3. Kamal F, Ismail MK, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W, Sharaiha RZ, Sharma S, McDonough S, Tariq R, Marella HK, Khan Z, Heda RP, Tombazzi C, Howden CW, Adler DG. Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of recurrent achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annalsofgastroenterology. 2021; 34 (2): 155–163. DOI: 10.20524/aog.2020.0563

4. Xu J, Zhong C, Huang S, Zeng X, Tan S, L, Peng Y, Lü M, Ma L, Tang X. Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Sigmoid-Type Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in medicine(Lausanne). 2021; 8: 677694. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.677694. eCollection 2021

5. Fujiyoshi MRA, Fujiyoshi Y, Inoue H. The third space for endoscopic treatment of motility disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino). 2023 Jun; 69 (2): 232–238. DOI: 10.23736/S2724–5985.22.03164–3. Epub 2022 Mar 28

6. Haseeb M, Khan Z, Kamal MU, Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC. Short-term outcomes after peroral endoscopic myotomy, Heller myotomy, and pneumatic dilation in patients with achalasia: a nationwide analysis. GastrointestEndosc. 2023 May; 97 (5): 871–879.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.01.004

7. Ponds FA, Fockens P, Lei A, Neuhaus H, Beyna T, Kandler J, Frieling T, Chiu PWY, Wu JCY, Wong VWY, Costamagna G, Familiari P, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation on Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcomes Among Treatment-Naive Patients With Achalasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019; 322 (2): 134–144. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8859

8. Zhang H, Wang K, Fang Y, Xiong Z, Lin M, Jiang L, Niu Q, Huang J. Modified Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Technique for Type II Achalasia: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Gastroenterologyresearchandpractice. 2022; 2022: 3424470. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3424470. eCollection 2022

9. Ofosu A, Mohan BP, Ichkhanian Y, Masadeh M, Febin J, Barakat M, Ramai D, Chandan S, Haiyeva G, Khan SR, AghaieMeybodi M, Facciorusso A, Repici A, Wani S, Thosani N, Khashab MA. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs pneumatic dilation (PD) in treatment of achalasia: A meta-analysis of studies with ≥ 12-month follow-up.Endoscopyinternationalopen. 2021; 9 (7): 1097–1107. DOI: 10.1055/a-1483–9406

10. Petrov RV, Fajardo RA, Bakhos CT, Abbas AE. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: techniques and outcomes. Shanghai Chest. 2021; 5: 14. DOI: 10.21037/shc.2020.02.0

11. NedoluzhkoI Yu., Shishin К.V., Kazakova S.S., Kurushkina N.А., Shumkina L.V., Bordin D.S. Comparison of the Results of the Oral Endoscopic Myotomy and Laparoscopic Esophagogastromyotomy in Patients with Esophageal Achalasia. Doctor.Ru. 2018; 3(147): 37–41. (In Russ.).

12. Olson MT, Triantafyllou T, Singhal S. A Decade of Investigation: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Versus Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy for Achalasia. Journal of laparoendoscopic& advanced surgical techniques. Part A. 2019; 29 (9): 1093-1104. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2019.0242

13. Dirks RC, Kohn GP, Slater B, Whiteside J, Rodriguez NA, Docimo S, Pryor A, Stefanidis D; SAGES guidelines committee. Is peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) more effective than pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical endoscopy. 2021; 35 (5): 1949–1962. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08353-w

14. Huang Z, Cui Y, Li Y, Chen M, Xing X. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia patients with prior Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointestinalendoscopy. 2021; 93 (1): 47–56.e5. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.056

15. Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of surgery. 2018; 267: 451–460. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002311

16. Mandavdhare HS, M PK, Shukla J, Kumar A, Sharma V. Role of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Advanced Achalasia Cardia With Sigmoid and/or Megaesophagus: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis. Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility. 2022; 28 (1): 15–27. DOI: 10.5056/jnm21122

17. Ueda C, Abe H, Tanaka S, Kawara F, Toyonaga T, Ariyoshi R, Sako T, Sakaguchi H, Ikezawa N, Urakami S, Nakai T, Kodama Y. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia with megaesophagus. Esophagus. 2021; 18 (4): 922–931. DOI: 10.1007/s10388-021-00833-1

18. Jin H, Wang B, Zheng ZQ, Zhang LL, Chen QY, Zhao CS, Wang BM, Zhao W. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia after failed pneumatic dilation.Surgical endoscopy. 2021; 35 (12): 6960–6968. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08207-x

19. Mohan BP, Andrew Ofosu, Saurabh Chandan, Daryl Ramai, Shahab R Khan, Suresh Ponnada, Douglas G Adler. Anterior versus posterior approach in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2020; 52 (4): 251–258. DOI: 10.1055/a-1090–0788

20. Smirnov AA, Lubchenko ME, Kiriltseva MM, Dvoretskiy SYu, Vasilevskij DI, Semenikhin KD, Burakov AN, Kaibysheva VO, Bagnenko SF. Complications of peroral endoscopic myotomy. 3-year experience of one center. ExperimentalandClinicalGastroenterology. 2018; 158 (10): 57–61. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31146/1682–8658-ecg-158-10-57-61

21. Maruyama S, Taniyama Y, Sakurai T, Hikage M, Sato C, Takaya K, Konno T, Naitoh T, Unno M, Kamei T. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for a sigmoid type of achalasia: short-term outcomes and changes in the esophageal angle. Surg Endosc. 2020; 34 (9): 4124–4130. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07180-4

22. Mandavdhare HS, M PK, Shukla J, Kumar A, Sharma V. Role of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Advanced Achalasia Cardia With Sigmoid and/or Megaesophagus: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis. Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility. 2022; 28 (1): 15–27. DOI: 10.5056/jnm21122

23. Al Lehibi A, Elkholy S, Gouda M, Al Dabbagh A, Al Balkhi A, Almtawa A, Al Otaibi N, El-Sherbiny M, Essam K, Alzahrani MA, Al Ghamdi A, Al Ghamdi A, Al Eid A, Qutub A, Alamr A, Ahmad S, Al Sayari K, Al Ibrahim B, Al Khathlan A, Alkhiari RE. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for the treatment of achalasia: A multicenter Middle Eastern experience. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2022; 28 (1): 74–79. DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_49_21

24. Liu-Burdowski J, Duarte-Chavez R, Kahaleh M. Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy: State of the Art. J ClinGastroenterol. 2022; 56 (1): 16–22. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001620

25. Quénéhervé L, Vauquelin B, Berger A, Coron E, Olivier R. Risk factors for clinical failure of peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9: 1099533. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1099533. eCollection 2022


Review

For citations:


Drobyazgin E.A., Chikinev Yu.V., Mit’ko N.I., Osipenko M.F., Korobeinikov A.V., Poliakevich A.S., Peshkova I.V., Shtofin S.G. Peroral endoscopic myotomy in achalasia (one centre experience of 150 operations). Medical alphabet. 2025;(13):24-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-13-24-27

Views: 32


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)