

Effectiveness of prebiotic rinse in dentistry
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-10-25-28
Abstract
Background: until recently, much of the scientific literature has focused on the efficacy of mouthwashes in the context of their ability to kill oral disease-causing bacteria under laboratory conditions. The antibacterial effects of mouthwashes on the oral microbiome can be either beneficial or harmful, depending on whether there is a ‘positive’ shift towards oral ‘health’ with diversity maintained or a ‘negative’ shift towards ‘disease’ with a predominance of one species.
Aim: to study the efficacy of prebiotic mouthwash in patients with complaints of oral dryness.
Materials and methods: 12 patients with complaints of dry mouth were examined. Gingivitis index PMA, Mülleman bleeding index, PCP test for Candida albicans, qualitative PCR test for Streptococcus mutans were determined in all patients. All parameters were determined twice: before the study and after.
Results: three months after using the prebiotic mouthwash, 92% of the patients had no complaints of oral dryness. The Mühlemann bleeding index and PMA index also decreased significantly. The concentration of fungi of the genus Candida and conditionally pathogenic StreptoccocusMutans decreased to clinically insignificant levels 3 months after the start of use.
Conclusions: 1. The use of prebiotic rinse for three months 2 times a day reduces the concentrations of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans, which in turn reduces the risk of dental diseases. 2. The use of prebiotic rinse eliminates oral dryness, normalizingthe protective function of saliva, reduces bleeding and gingival hyperaemia.
About the Authors
E. A. SatygoRussian Federation
Satygo Elena – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Paediatric and Therapeutic Dentistry named after Y.A. Fedorov,
Moscow
A. P. Limina
Russian Federation
Limina Alisa – paediatric dentist, assistant of the Chair of Paediatric and Therapeutic
Dentistry named after Y.A. Fedorov,
Moscow
D. Amanova
Russian Federation
Amanova Jemal – 5th year student of the Institute of Stomatology,
Moscow
References
1. Relman D.A. Human microbiome: ecosystem stability and health. Nutr Rev. 2012;70:S2–S9. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00489.x.8.
2. Lasalle F., Spagnoletti M., Fumagalli M. et al. The oral microbiomes of hunter-gatherers and traditional farmers indicate shifts in the balance of commensals and the burden of nutritional pathogens. Mol Ecol. 2018;27(1):182–195. doi: 10.1111/mec.14435.9.
3. Kumar P.S. Microbial dysbiosis: the main cause of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol. 2021;92(8):1079–1087. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0245.10.
4. Sajedinejad N, Paknejad M, Houshmand B, et al. Lactobacillus salivarius NK02: a potent probiotic for clinical application in mouthwash. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2018;10(3):485–495. doi: 10.1007/s12602-017-9296-4.
5. Gedam KY, Katre AN. Efficacy of probiotic, chlorhexidine, and sodium fluoride mouthrinses on mutans streptococci in 8- to 12-year-old children: a crossover randomized trial. Lifestyle Genom. 2022;15(1):35–44. doi: 10.1159/000519916.
6. Bandara H, Panduwawala CP, Samaranayake LP. Biodiversity of the human oral mycobiome in health and disease. OralDis. 2019;25(2):363–371. doi: 10.1111/odi.12899.
7. Imabayashi Y, Moriyama M, Takeshita T, et al. Molecular analysis of fungal populations in patients with oral candidiasis using next-generation sequencing. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28110. doi: 10.1038/srep28110.
8. Nagappan N, Champakesan B, Tirupati N, D’Cruz TM, Ramasubramanian PP, Premnath P. Antimicrobial efficacy of two mouthrinses against Candida albicans: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 2):S293–S2S6. doi: 10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_16_19
9. Shrestha ARJ, Rao A, Sequeira PS, Doshi D, Bhat GK. In vitro antifungal effect of mouth rinses containing chlorhexidine and thymol. J Dent Sciences. 2011; 6(1):1–5.
10. Tamai R, Sugamata M, Kiyoura Y. Candida albicans enhances invasion of human gingival epithelial cells and gingival fibroblasts by Porphyromonasgingivalis. MicrobPathog. 2011;51(4):250–254. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2011.06.009.
11. Kudzoev B.A., Kalagova R.V. Saliva as a unique biochemical liquid (literature review) // Bulletin of Science No. 2 (35) volume 3. pp. 124–135. 2021. ISBN 2712- 8849 // Electronic resource: https://www.вестник-науки.RussianFederation/article/4222 (accessed: 02/28/2025).
12. Rahmani-Badi A, Sepehr S, Babaie-Naiej H. A combination of cis-2-decenoic acid and chlorhexidine removes dental plaque. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60(11):1655–1661. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.08.006.
13. Ardizzoni A, Pericolini E, Paulone S, et al. In vitro effects of commercial mouthwashes on several virulence traits of Candida albicans, viridans streptococci and Enterococcus faecalis colonizing the oral cavity. PLoS One. 2018;13(11) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207262.
14. Ribeiro Rocha GDS, Neves Duarte T, de Oliveira Corrêa G, Nampo FK, de Paula Ramos S. Chemical cleaning methods for prostheses colonized by Candida spp.: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124(6):653–658. doi: 10.1016/j. prosdent.2019.10.004.
15. Fernandez MDS, Guedes MIF, Langa GPJ, Rösing CK, Cavagni J, Muniz F. Virucidal efficacy of chlorhexidine: a systematic review. Odontology. 2022;110(2):376–392. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00660-x.
16. Brookes Z, Teoh L, Cieplik F, Kumar P. Mouthwash Effects on the Oral Microbiome: Are They Good, Bad, or Balanced? Int Dent J. 2023 Nov;73 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): S74–S81. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Oct 17. PMID: 37867065; PMCID: PMC10690560.
17. Chiam TL, Choo J, Ashar A, Hussaini HM, Rajandram RK, Nordin R. Efficacy of natural enzymes mouthwash: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 19;28(5):259. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05658-7. PMID: 38639763.
18. Russkikh I.S., Cheremnykh A.I. Clinical-laboratory evaluation of the effectiveness of roth flow depolaskivatels // International Student Scientific Bulletin. – 2019. – № 3.
Review
For citations:
Satygo E.A., Limina A.P., Amanova D. Effectiveness of prebiotic rinse in dentistry. Medical alphabet. 2025;(10):25-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-10-25-28