Buy (150 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Updated national guidelines for spirometry. Part 3. Conducting and evaluating the results of bronchodilatation test. Features of spirometry in children
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-15-8-12
Abstract
In the third part of the article, the bronchodilation tests methodology was considered: indications, contraindications, test procedure, interpretation. The methods of the bronchodilatory response assessing were considered, the differences between modern Russian recommendations and ERS/ATS interpretive strategies the bronchodilatory response assessing were shown. The specifics of the test procedure and evaluation of bronchodilation tests in children were described separately
About the Authors
M. Yu. Kameneva
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kameneva Marina Yu. - MD, Leading Researcher at the Research Institute of Rheumatology and Allergology of the Scientific and Clinical Research Center; doctor of functional Diagnostics of the functional diagnostics office of the polyclinic with the CDC Clinic of the Scientific and Clinical Research Center
L. D. Kiryukhina
Pulmonology Scientific Research Institute; Saint-Petersburg State Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kiryukhina Larisa D. - Ph.D., Head of the Department of Functional and Ultrasound Diagnostics; Leading researcher, Head of the Research Laboratory of Functional research
P. V. Struchkov
Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies; Clinical Hospital No.85
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Struchkov Pyotr V. - MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Physiology and Functional Diagnostics of the Academy of Postgraduate Education; Deputy Head of Diagnostic Service
Moscow
References
1. Kameneva M.Yu., CherniakA. V., Aisanov Z.R., et al. Spirometry: national guidelines for the testing and interpretation of results. Pulmonology. 2023; 33 (3): 307–340. DOI: 10.18093/0869–0189–2023–33–3–307–340
2. Enright P.L, Lebowitz M.D, CockroftD.W.Physiologic measures: pulmonary function tests: asthma outcome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 1994; 149 (2, Pt 2): S9–18. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/149.2_Pt_2.S9
3. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global Strategy for Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of COPD. 2023 Report. Available at: https://goldcopd.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/GOLD-2023-ver-1.3–17Feb2023_WMV.pdf
4. Kameneva M. Yu., Kirуukhina L. D., Struchkov P. V. Updated national guidelines for spirometry. Part 1. Test rules and quality criterias. Medical alphabet. 2023;(22):7–18. https://doi.org/10.33667/2078–5631–2023–22–7–18
5. Graham B. L., Steenbruggen I., Miller M. R. et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019. Update an official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019; 200 (8): e70–88. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201908–1590ST.
6. Perelman Yu.M., Prikhodko A. G. Spirographic diagnosis of lung ventilation disorders: A manual for doctors: 2nd edition, supplement. Blagoveshchensk, 2013. 44 p.
7. Pellegrino R., Viegi G., Brusasco V. et al. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur. Respir. J. 2005; 26 (5): 948–968. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205.
8. Federal clinical guidelines. Bronchial asthma. 2021. Available: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/359_2
9. Federal clinical guidelines. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2021. Available: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/603_2
10. Tan W. C., Vollmer W. M., Lamprecht B. et al. Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Thorax. 2012; 67 (8): 718–726. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011–201445
11. Quanjer P. H., Ruppel G. L., Langhammer A. et al. Bronchodilator response in FVC is larger and more relevant than in FEV1 in severe airflow obstruction. Chest. 2017; 151 (5): 1088–1098. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.12.017
12. Cerveri I., Pellegrino R., Dore R. et al. Mechanisms for isolated volume response to a bronchodilator in patients with COPD. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985). 2000; 88 (6): 1989–1995. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.2000.88.6.1989
13. Stanojevic S., KaminskyD.A., MillerM.R. et al. ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur. Respir. J. 2022; 60 (1): 2101499. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01499–2021.
14. Crenesse D., Berlioz M., Bourrier T., Albertini M. Spirometry in children aged 3 to 5 years: reliability of forced expiratory maneuvers. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2001; 32 (1): 56–61. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1089
15. Piccioni P., Borraccino A., Forneris M. P. et al. Reference values of forced expiratory volumes and pulmonary flows in 3–6 year children: a crosssectional study. Respir. Res. 2007; 8 (1): 14. DOI: 10.1186/1465–9921–8–14
16. Bronchial asthma. Clinical recommendations (draft). 2024. https://spulmo.ru/upload/kr/BA_2024_draft.pdf
17. Levy M. L., Quanjer P.H., Booker R. et al. Diagnostic spirometry in primary care: Proposed standards for general practice compliant with American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society recommendations. Prim. Care Resp. J. 2009; 18 (3): 130–147. DOI: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00054
18. Borrego L. M., Stocks J., Almeida I. et al. Bronchodilator responsiveness using spirometry in healthy and asthmatic preschool children. Arch. Dis. Child. 2013; 98 (2): 112–117. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2012–301819
19. Burity E. F., Pereira C. A., JonesM.H. et al. Bronchodilator response cut-off points and FEV 0.75 reference values for spirometry in preschoolers. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2016; 42 (5): 326–332. DOI: 10.1590/S1806–37562015000000216
Review
For citations:
Kameneva M.Yu., Kiryukhina L.D., Struchkov P.V. Updated national guidelines for spirometry. Part 3. Conducting and evaluating the results of bronchodilatation test. Features of spirometry in children. Medical alphabet. 2024;(15):8-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-15-8-12
Views:
617
Email this article 