

Three-dimensional vector ECG analysis in the diagnosis of the left bundle branch block
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-32-27-34
Abstract
The complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) leads to the development of severe heart failure and requires resynchronization therapy(CRT). It is known that one third of patients do not respond to CRT. In this regard, it is necessary to search new diagnostic criteria for patient selection for CRT.
Aim. Determination of the criteria for CLBBB using three-dimensional vectorcardiography data with analysis of the rate of vector loop formation.
Material and research methods. The study included 137 patients. The main group consisted of 57 patients with CLBBB, which was based on D. G. Strauss et al. (2011) criteria. Causes of CLBBB and comorbidities were not considered. The control group included 80 healthy individuals. All patients underwent synchronous registration of 12 standard ECG leads and reconstruction of a three-dimensional vectorcardiogram (VCG) using the McFee-Parungao system.
Research results. The following signs are characteristic for CLBBB according to three-dimensional VCG data: • fracture of the spatial vector loop due to a change in the direction of the excitation front in its middle part; • reduction in planarity index (PI) less than 80%; • a sharp, by a factor of 2 or more, decrease in the speed of tracing a spatial vector loop in its middle part with the formation of a “claw-shaped” curve with two peaks R and L.
Conclusion. Three-dimensional VCG allows you to reliably determine the «true» CLBBB, based on the “fracture” of the spatial vector loop with a reduction in PI less than 80% and a significant decrease in the speed of tracing the vector loop in its middle part with the formation of a “clawshaped” curve and carry out a differential diagnosis with “false” СLBBB, in which changes on the ECG are associated with a combination of left ventricular hypertrophy and left anterior fascicular block, when there is no “fracture” of the loop, a reduction in PI, and the routing speed decreases at the end of the loop without forming a “claw-shaped” curve.
About the Authors
Yu. E. TeregulovRussian Federation
Teregulov Yu. E., Head of the Department of Functional Diagnostics, Assistant Professor of the Department of hospital therapy, MD
Kazan.
M. S. Maksimova
Russian Federation
Maksimova M. S., Assistant Professor of the Department of Functional Diagnostics, PhD
Kazan.
E. T. Teregulov
Russian Federation
Teregulova E. T., Assistant Professor of the Department of Functional Diagnostics, PhD
Kazan.
F. R. Chuvashayeva
Russian Federation
Chuvashayeva F. R., Assistant Lecturer of the Department of Functional Diagnostics
Kazan.
A. Yu. Teregulov
Russian Federation
Teregulov A. Yu., Assistant Professor, Department of Surgical Diseases of Postgraduate Education
Kazan.
O. I. Milyutina
Russian Federation
Milyutina О. I., radiologist
Moscow.
I. I. Milyutina
Russian Federation
Milyutina I. I., laboratory assistant Department of Functional Diagnostics
Kazan.
References
1. Кузнецов В.А. Сердечная ресинхронизирующая терапия: избранные вопросы. Москва 2007; 128 С.
2. Vardas P., Auricchio A., Blanc J., Daubert J. et al. Guidelines for cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Task Force for Cardiac Pacing and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in Collaboration with the EuropeanHeart Rhythm Association// Eur Heart J. 2007.Sep;28(18):2256–95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm305.
3. Francia P., Balla C., Paneni F., Volpe M. LeftBundle-Branch Block — Pathophysiology,Prognosis, and Clinical. Clin. Cardiol. 2007 Mar;30(3):110–5. doi: 10.1002/clc.20034.
4. Zannad F., Huvelle E., Dickstein K., van Veldhuisen D.J., Stellbrink C., Køber L.,Cazeau S., Ritter P., Maggioni A.P., Ferrari R., Lechat P. Left bundle branchblock as a risk factor for progression to heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007 Jan;9(1):7–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2006.04.011.
5. Imanishi R., Seto S., Ichimaru S., Nakashima E., Yano K., Akahoshi M. Prognostic significance of incident complete left bundle branch block observed over a 40-year period. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 1;98(5):644-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.044.
6. Schneider J., Thomas J., Kreger B. et al. Newly acquired left bundle branch block: the Framingham study. Ann Intern Med 1979; 90:303–10.
7. Khan K., Good K., Cleland J. et al. Prevalence of ECG abnormalities in an international survey of patients with suspected or confirmed heart failure at death or discharge // Eur J Heart Failure 2007; Vol. 9:491–501.
8. Strauss D.G., Selvester R.H., Wagner G.S. Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:927–934
9. Breithardt G., Breithardt O.A. Left bundle branch block, an old-new entity. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012; 5(2):107–116.
10. Strauss D. G. Differentiation between left bundle branch block and left ventricular hypertrophy: Implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2012 Nov-Dec;45(6):635–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.09.001.
11. Strauss D.G., Selvester R.H. The QRS complex-a biomarker that “images” the heart: QRS scores to quantify myocardial scar in the presence of normal and abnormal ventricular conduction. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2008.07.011.
12. Jastrzębski M., Kukla P., Kisiel R., Fijorek K., Moskal P. and Czarnecka D. Comparison of four LBBB definitions for predicting mortality in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 Sep;23(5):e12563. doi: 10.1111/anec.12563.
13. Galeotti L., van Dam P. M., Loring Z., Chan D., & Strauss D. G. (2013). Evaluating strict and conventional left bundle branch block criteria using electrocardiographic simulations. Europace, 2013 Dec;15(12):1816–21. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut132.
14. Pérez-Riera A.R., Barbosa-Barros R., de Rezende Barbosa M.P.C., DaminelloRaimundo R., de Abreu L.C., Nikus K. Left bundle branch block: Epidemiology, etiology, anatomic features, electrovectorcardiography, and classification proposal Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2019 Mar;24(2):e12572. doi: 10.1111/anec.12572.
15. Pastore C.A., Samesima N., Pereira FilhoH.G., Tobias N.M.M.O., MadalosoB.A., Facin M. E. Applicability of the Electro-Vectorcardiogram in Current Clinical Practice. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2019 Jun 27;113(1):87–99. doi: 10.5935/abc.20190095.
16. Титомир Л.И., Руткай-Недецкий И. Анализ ортогональной электрокардиограммы. М.: Наука, 1990. 198 с.
17. Sedaghat G., Ghafoori E., Waks J.W., Kabir M.M., Shvilkin A., Josephson M.E., Tereshchenko L.G. Quantitative Assessment of Vectorcardiographic Loop Morphology. J Electrocardiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;49(2):154–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.12.014.
18. Терегулов Ю.Э., Ацель Е.А., Ганиева С. Ф., Терегулова Е. Т., Максимова М.С., Терегулов А.Ю., Камалетдинова З.А. Трехмерный векторный анализ ЭКГ в диагностике блокады передневерхней ветви левой ножки пучка Гиса. Медицинский алфавит. Современная функциональная диагностика. 2023; (15): 28–34. https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-15-28-34
Review
For citations:
Teregulov Yu.E., Maksimova M.S., Teregulov E.T., Chuvashayeva F.R., Teregulov A.Yu., Milyutina O.I., Milyutina I.I. Three-dimensional vector ECG analysis in the diagnosis of the left bundle branch block. Medical alphabet. 2023;(32):27-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-32-27-34