One-stage dental implantation without orthopedic loads – histological and radiographic control of survival
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2022-22-12-17
Abstract
Purpose: histological and radiographic study and comparison of osseointegration and stability of implants without orthopedic load, installed in different ways (simultaneously in a fresh socket immediately after tooth extraction and in mature bone).
Materials and methods: the criterion for inclusion in the study was the possibility of placing a test (immediately after tooth extraction) and a control implant (in mature bone) on opposite sites without the use of osteoplastic materials or membranes. The procedures were followed by periapical radiography, which was repeated three months later. According to the comparative data of the images, the marginal loss of bone tissue was calculated. Both implants were removed to obtain histological specimens. Sections were prepared by standard staining with hematoxylin and eosin. Using an X-ray digitizer, the percentage of implant-to-bone connection was calculated.
Results: the data of histological and radiographic studies showed no significant difference in the osseointegration of the implant in the post-extraction lenok and in the mature bone. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of bone connection between test and control implants placed in different jaws. Connective tissue in implants is absent, as well as fibrous. Bone destruction was not observed in histological sections.
Conclusions: jsseointegration and survival of dental implants without orthopedic load, installed without the use of osteoplastic materials in a fresh post-extraction hole and in a mature bone is almost the same, regardless of the place of installation (upper or lower jaw).
About the Authors
R. V. Studenikin
Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Roman V. Studenikin - candidate of medical sciences, doctoral candidate.
Voronezh.
A. A. Filin
Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Filin - сandidate of medical sciences, Head of the Department of Pathological Anatomy.
Voronezh.
A. A. Mamedov
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (Sechenovskiy University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Adil A. Mamedov - doctor of medical sciences, Professor of the Department of Pediatric, Preventive Dentistry and Orthodontics.
Moscow.
K. S. Niftaliev
Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kenan S. Niftaliev - 4th year student.
Voronezh.
References
1. Schropp L., Wenzel A., Kostopoulos L., Karring, T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2003; 23(4): 313-323.
2. Ten Heggeler, J. M. A. G., Slot D.E., Van der Weijden G.A. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clinical oral implants research. 2011; 22(8): 779-788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02064.x
3. Strietzel F.P., Nowak M., Küchler I., Friedmann, A. Peri-implant alveolar bone loss with respect to bone quality after use of the osteotome technique: results of a retrospective study. Clinical oral implants research. 2002; 13(5); 508-513. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130510.x
4. McAllister B.S., Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. Journal of periodontology. 2007; 78(3): 377-396. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060048
5. Masaki C., Nakamoto T., Mukaibo T., Kondo Y., Hosokawa R. Strategies for alveolar ridge reconstruction and preservation for implant therapy. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2015; 59(4): 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.04.005
6. Schropp L., Isidor F. Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2008; 35: 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01827.x
7. Leblebicioglu B., Salas M., Ort Y., Johnson A., Yildiz V.O., Kim D.G., Tatakis D. N. Determinants of alveolar ridge preservation differ by anatomic location. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2013; 40(4): 387-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12065
8. Rosen P.S., Reynolds M.A. Guided bone regeneration for dehiscence and fenestration defects on implants using an absorbable polymer barrier. Journal of periodontology. 2001; 72(2): 250-256. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.2.250
9. Covani U., Bortolaia C., Barone A., Sbordone L. Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after immediate and delayed implant placement. Journal of Periodontology. 2004; 75(12): 1605-1612. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.12.1605
10. Becker W., Goldstein M. Immediate implant placement: treatment planning and surgical steps for successful outcome. Periodontology 2000. 2008; 47(1): 79-89.
11. Becker W., Dahlin C., Becker B.E. The use of ePTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: A prospective multicenter study. International Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1994; 9:31-40.
12. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefore of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: A literature review. Journal of Periodontology. 1997; 68:915-923. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.915
13. Chen S.T., Darby I.B., Adams G.G., Reynolds E.C. A prospective clinical study of bone augmentation techniques at immediate implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2005; 16(2): 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01093.x
14. Naji B.M., Abdelsameaa S.S., Alqutaibi A.Y., Ahmed W.S. Immediate dental implant placement with a horizontal gap more than two millimetres: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 50(5): 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2020.08.015
15. Kfir E., Kfir V., Kaluski E. Immediate bone augmentation after infected tooth extraction using titanium membranes. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2007; 33(3): 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2007)33[133:IBAAIT]2.0.CO;2
16. Salama H, Salama M. (1993). The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: A systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 1993; 13: 313-333.
17. Studenikin R., Niftaliev S. Artificial intelligence and digital technologies to determine the timing of orthopedic loading of implants. International Journal of Dentistry and Oral Science. 2021; 8(10): 4812-4820. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.19070/2377-8075-21000975
18. Ortega-Martínez J., Pérez-Pascual T., Mareque-Bueno S., Hernández-Alfaro F., Ferrés-Padró E. Immediate implants following tooth extraction. A systematic review. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia buccal. 2012; 17(2): e251-е261. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17469
19. Marconcini S., Barone A., Gelpi F., Briguglio F., Covani U. Immediate implant placement in infected sites: a case series. Journal of periodontology. 2013; 84(2): 196-202. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.110279
20. Siormpas K.D., Mitsias M.E., Kontsiotou-Siormpa E., Garber D., Kotsakis G.A. Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone Utilizing the “Root-Membrane” Technique: Clinical Results up to 5 Years Postloading. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014; 29(6): 1397-1405. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3707
21. Del Fabbro M., Testori T., Francetti L., Taschieri S., Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for immediately loaded dental implants. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2006; 26(3): 248-263.
22. Lang N.P., Bragger U., Hammerle C.H., Sutter E. Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration. I. Rationale, clinical procedure and 30-month results. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1994; 5(3): 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050306.x
23. Berglundh T., Gislason Ö., Lekholm U., Sennerby L., Lindhe J. Histopathological observations of human periimplantitis lesions. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2004; 31(5): 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00486.x
24. Arunjaroensuk S., Panmekiate S., Pimkhaokham A. The stability of augmented bone between two different membranes used for guided bone regeneration simultaneous with dental implant placement in the esthetic zone. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2018; 33(1): 206-216. DOI: 10.11607/jomi.5492
25. Buser D., Chappuis V., Belser U.C., Chen, S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000. 2017; 73(1), 84-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12170
Review
For citations:
Studenikin R.V., Filin A.A., Mamedov A.A., Niftaliev K.S. One-stage dental implantation without orthopedic loads – histological and radiographic control of survival. Medical alphabet. 2022;(22):12-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2022-22-12-17
Views:
209
Email this article 