Objective assessment of measurement error in significant cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice
A. A. Dolgalev,
A. B. Danaev,
R. D. Yusupov,
Shazmim Jahan Hossain,
R. G. Gabrielyan,
K. E. Zolotaev https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2022-7-65-68
Abstract
X-ray method in modern realities is the main method for assessing the state of bone tissue. Cone beam computed tomography has proven itself in dental practice as a reliable method for assessing the bone tissue of the dentoalveolar system. In implant dentistry, an important factor in obtaining a good result is a qualitative assessment of the structure and morphology of the bone tissue of the upper and lower jaws. Unfortunately, when measuring the optical density of the areas of interest, it is not always possible to obtain correct data on the state of the bone tissue, moreover, implant dentists often have to visually assess the quality of bone density for treatment in their practice, but we understand that this is subjective. This work is aimed at determining the error in calculating the optical density of bone tissue using Dicom viewer programs.
About the Authors
A. A. Dolgalev
Stavropol State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dolgalev A.A., PhD, MD, Head of the Center for Innovation and Technology Transfer, Professor of the Department of General Practice Dentistry and Pediatric Dentistry
Stavropol
A. B. Danaev
Stavropol State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Danaev A.B., assistant of the Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy with a course of additional professional education
Stavropol
R. D. Yusupov
Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute-branch of the Volgograd State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yusupov Ruslan Dokkaevich, PhD, MD, Head of the Department of Clinical Dentistry with a course of OS and MFS
Pyatigorsk
Shazmim Jahan Hossain
The Peoples Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Hossain Shazmim Jahan, DDS, assistant lecturer, the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery
Moscow
R. G. Gabrielyan
Stavropol State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Gabrielyan R.G., assistant of the Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy with a course of additional professional education
Stavropol
K. E. Zolotaev
Stavropol State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zolotaev Kirill Evgenievich, Postgraduate of the Department of general and pediatric dentistry
Stavropol
References
1. Naumovich S. S., Naumovich S. A. Cone-beam computed tomography: modern possibilities and prospects of application in dentistry //Modern dentistry. – 2012.– № 2 (55).
2. L. Feldkamp, L. Davis, and J. Kress. Practical cone-beam al-gorithm. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1984; 1(6):612–619. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287772957_Practical_Cone-Beam_Algorithm.
3. Scarfe, William C., and Allan G. Farman. «What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?» Dental Clinics of North America. 2008; 52(4): 707-730. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18805225.
4. Marusina M.Ya., Kaznacheeva A.O. Modern types of tomography / Textbook. – St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University ITMO, 2006. – 132 p.
5. Sidky EY, Pan X. Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography byconstrained, total-variation minimization. Phys. Med. Biol 2008; vol. 53:4777–4807. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18701771.
6. Patsrisawat T, Gacic A, Franchetti F, Puschel M & Moura JMF in Proceedings. (ICASSP ‘05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005 v/153–v/156 (Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005).
7. Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJWL, Biology C, et al. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(8):500–10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29777175.
8. Freitas DQ, Fontenele RC, Nascimento EHL, Vasconcelos TV, Noujeim M. Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Dec;47(8):20180151. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29916722.
9. Bezerra ISQ, Neves FS, Vasconcelos TV, Ambrosano GMB, Freitas DQ. Influence of the artefact reduction algorithm of Picasso Trio КЛКТ system on the diagnosis of vertical root fractures in teeth with metal posts. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015; 44:1-8.
10. Leite, A. F., Vasconcelos, K. D. F., Willems, H., & Jacobs, R. Radiomics and Machine Learning in Oral Healthcare. PROTEOMICS–Clinical Applications, 2020, p. 1900040.
11. Zhang Y, Yue N, Su MY, Liu B, Ding Y, Zhou Y, Wang H, Kuang Y, Nie K. Improving CBCT quality to CT level using deep learning with generative adversarial network. Med Phys. 2021 Jun;48(6):2816-2826. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33259647
12. Chen W, Li Y, Yuan N, Qi J, Dyer BA, Sensoy L, Benedict SH, Shang L, Rao S, Rong Y. Clinical Enhancement in AI-Based Post-processed Fast-Scan Low-Dose CBCT for Head and Neck Adaptive Radiotherapy. Front Artif Intell. 2021 Feb 11;3:614384. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33733226.
Review
For citations:
Dolgalev A.A., Danaev A.B., Yusupov R.D., Hossain Sh.J., Gabrielyan R.G., Zolotaev K.E. Objective assessment of measurement error in significant cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. Medical alphabet. 2022;(7):65-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2022-7-65-68
Views:
353
Email this article 