Different methods of professional oral hygiene. Literature review

Relevance. The problem of the effectiveness of oral hygiene is currently relevant due to the introduction of new tools and methods of Prophylaxis hygiene.

Objective. The aim of this study is to Conduct a literature review from different database on modern methods of professional oral hygiene using the keywords: air polishing; glycine; sodium bicarbonate; dental caries; alternative methods, air abrasive. To study different literature sources on the effectiveness of using modern air-abrasive procedures for professional hygiene.

Methods. Electronic databases PubMed, eLibrary were screened. Selected studies that investigate the efficacy of various professional hygiene practices and their effects on the state of the oral cavity.

Results. By keywords, 1345 abstracts were found that cover the results of scaling – 544, polishing – 704, remineralization – 97. 24 were included in the analysis on various methods of oral hygiene, taking into account the state of hard and soft tissues when using air-abrasive polishing.

Conclusion. Data confirms the variety of professional oral hygiene methods used and the efficacy of their results. Studies on the impact of various procedures of curette, scaling, and polishing on tooth tissues have shown conflicting findings. More research into the efficacy of professional oral hygiene practices is required.

1. Modern methods of prevention of dental diseases / S.N. Razumova, A.S. Brago, L.M. Khasanova [et al.] // Medical Alphabet. – 2018. – Vol. 3. – № 24(361). – Pp. 69–70.

2. Problematic issues of assessing the hygienic state of the oral cavity and their clinical solution / M.T. Alexandrov, V.N. Olesova, E.F. Dmitrieva [et al.] // Dentistry. – 2020. – Vol. 99. – No. 4. – pp. 21–26. – DOI 10.17116/stomat20209904121.

3. The study of the effect of using a rigid brush with a paste of a high degree of abrasiveness according to profilometry data / S.N. Razumova, Yu.S. Kozlova, A.S. Brago [et al.] // Medical Alphabet. – 2021. – No. 38. – pp. 41–44. – DOI 10.33667/2078-5631-2021-38-41-44.

4. Studying the effect of dental plaque removal using low–frequency ultrasound and ozonated contact medium on the clinical course of chronic generalized catarrhal gingivitis in young people / G. R. Mkhoyan, S. N. Razumova, A. G. Volkov [et al.] // Medical Alphabet. – 2021. – No. 12. – pp. 16–20. – DOI 10.33667/2078-5631-2021-12-16-20.

5. Yarunova V. A. Modern studies of prevention of dental caries //Academy. – 2017. – №. 7 (22).

6. Demyanenko S.A., Marchenko N.V., Fedorova A.A. Effectiveness of application of occupational hygiene methods in clinical practice //Tavrichesky medico-biological Bulletin. – 2018. – Vol. 21. – No. 4. – pp. 19–22.

7. Cobb C. M., Sottosanti J. S. A re-evaluation of scaling and root planing //Journal of Periodontology. – 2021.

8. Lamont T. et al. Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults // Cochrane database of systematic reviews. – 2018. – №. 12.

9. Bühler J. et al. A systematic review on the effects of air polishing devices on oral tissues //International journal of dental hygiene. – 2016. – Т. 14. – №. 1. – С. 15–28.

10. Huerzeler M. B. et al. The effectiveness of different root debridement modalities in open flap surgery //Journal of clinical periodontology. – 1998. – Т. 25. – №. 3. – С. 202–208.

11. Zhang W. et al. Clinical, inflammatory and microbiological outcomes of full-mouth scaling with adjunctive glycine powder air-polishing: A randomized trial // Journal of Clinical Periodontology. – 2021. – Т. 48. – №. 3. – С. 389–399.

12. Manak T.N. et al. Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of air polishing technology of teeth //Modern dentistry. – 2018. – №. 4 (73).

13. Reizvih O.E., Denga O.V., Anisimova L.V. The use of air-abrasive systems during professional oral hygiene in children //Innovations in dentistry. – 2017. – № 1 (15).

14. Cunha-Cruz J. et al. “Everybody Brush!”: Protocol for a Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial of a Family-Focused Primary Prevention Program With Distribution of Oral Hygiene Products and Education to Increase Frequency of Toothbrushing //JMIR research protocols. – 2015. – Т. 4. – №. 2. – С. e58.

15. Sokolovskaya O.I., Manak T.N., Polyanskaya L.N. Studying the clinical effectiveness of Airflow technology. – 2020. Sokolovskaya O.I., Manak T.N., Polyanskaya L.N. Studying the clinical effectiveness of Airflow technology. – 2020.

16. Zemskova T.S., Tikhonova T.A., Tsyplukhina N.A. Comparison of clinical efficacy of abrasive preparations of the Air-Flow system //Bulletin of medical Internet conferences. – Limited Liability Company «Science and Innovation», 2015. – Vol. 5. – No. 11. – pp. 1282–1283.

17. Alyoshina Ya.Yu., Volozhanin S.D. Professional oral hygiene. Comparison of the airflow system with polishing brushes and pastes //Topical issues of modern medicine. – 2018. – pp. 242–244.

18. Janicki T. et al. Surface of root cementum following air-polishing with bioactive hydroxyapatite (Ca and P mapping). A pilot study //Acta Bioeng Biomech. – 2012. – Т. 14. – №. 1. – С. 31–8.

19. Polyanskaya L.N. Technology of air polishing of teeth //Modern dentistry. – 2017. – №. 4 (69).

20. Pelka M. et al. Influence of air-polishing devices and abrasives on root dentin-an in vitro confocal laser scanning microscope study //Quintessence Int. – 2010. – Т. 41. – №. 7. – С. 141–148.

21. Tada K. et al. Effect of particle diameter on air polishing of dentin surfaces // Odontology. – 2010. – Т. 98. – №. 1. – С. 31–36.

22. Agger M.S., Hörsted-Bindslev P., Hovgaard O. Abrasiveness of an air-powder polishing system on root surfaces in vitro //Quintessence international. – 2001. – Т. 32. – №. 5.

23. Horning G.M., Cobb C.M., Killoy W.J. Effect of an air-powder abrasive system on root surfaces in periodontal surgery //Journal of clinical periodontology. – 1987. – Т. 14. – №. 4. – С. 213–220.

24. Lavigne CK, Nauman RK, Munley MM, Suzuki JB. In vitro evaluation of air-powder polishing as an adjunct to ultrasonic scaling on periodontally involved root surfaces. J Dent Hyg 1988; 62: 504–509.

25.