Results determination of need patients to implantology dentistry help in depending of extent’s occlusion defects in different territorial-administrative zone of Tajikistan

Aim. To define the needs of patient in implantology dentistry help in depending of extent defect teeth rows beside populations living in different region of the Republic of Tajikistan.

Material and methods. In the article are presents the results determination of needs patients to implantology dentistry help in depending of extent defect teeth rows beside populations living in different region of the Republic of Tajikistan. In examined group entered dentistry patients both sexual difference with defect of the teeth rows which were divided into 3 groups: 1st group formed the 372 patients with small defect of the teeth rows (absence 1–3 teeth); in 2nd group entered 783 examined patients with average extent (absence 4–6 teeth) of the defect of teeth row; 3rd group formed 109 patients with greater defect of the teeth rows (absence more than 6 teeth). For the reason studies of extent defect teeth rows organized clinical and epidemiological examination of the orthopedic status in different territorial-administrative zone.

Results. Amongst examined persons in respect of defect of the teeth rows by small extent exists reliable reduction their prevalence on measure of the increase the age, then comparatively occlusion defects with average and big extent noted reliable increase of the factor of prevalence.

Conclusions. Got material allow to improve rendering of implant’s prosthesis in depending of extent occlusion defects and hereinafter completely shorten the risk of invalidation chewing device.

1. Fedi P.E., Gray J.L. Пародонтологическая азбука. Четвертое издание. М., 2013: 58–61. Fedi P.E., Gray J.L..Parodontological abc. The fourth publishing. М., 2013: 58–61.

2. Kovalenko A.Yu., Iroshnikova E.S. Warning the complications and conflict situation under orthopedic treatment patients with anomaly occlusion in combination with vertical deforming of teeth rows. Dental Forum. 2012; 5: 68–9.

3. Тrezubov V.N., Sapronova O.N., Kusevitskii L.Ya. The phenomena of the formation of prosthetic parodontitis beside person (clinical form parodontitis). Institute of Dentistry. 2018; 4: 48–9.

4. Sailer I., Pjetursson B.E., Hammerle C.H. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at 3 years. Part II: fixed partial prostheses. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2015; 18 (supple): 86–96.

5. Behend D.A. Ceramometal restorations with supragingival margins. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 47: 625–32.

6. Smith D.E., Zarb G.A. Criteria for success for ossiointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosth Dent. 2012; 62: 567–72.

7. Spiekermann H. Color atlas of dental medicine. Implantology. Thieme, Stuttgart. New York. 2015: 323–8.