Biological notes of bone grafting in oral surgery

Introduction: the article presents the results of the outcomes analysis of bone grafting for dental implants, review some technical and biological factors that caused the success in this oral surgery. Also describes the different types of the maxillary sinus floor, «micro-window» technique for sinus-lifting and local bone modifying. This current aims to evaluate clinical outcomes after various bone grafting techniques for dental implan-tation, as well as to analyze the biological success factors of these surgery.

Materials and methods: 134 bone grafting surgeries were performed - 23 men and 73 women. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to the methods: Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR); Bone Block (BB) transplantation; micro-window Sinus-lifting (mwSL); Local Bone Modifying (LBM).Results: The operations of the GBR and BB together showed an unsuccessful result in 72.36% of cases, while the bad outcomes of the mwSL and LBM operations were 7.7%. The better results were in groups with mwSL (success in 97.5%) and LBM surgery (87.1%).

Conclusion: This demonstrates the clinical importance and effectiveness of various bone grafting methods. GBR and BB are less predictable in success, in contrast to mwSL and LBM, which we recommend. However, the factors affect the success of this surgery require further study.

1. Sadykov M.I. Optimizaciya ortopedicheskogo lecheniya bolnyh s polnym otsut-stviem zubov. // Institut stomatologii. 2006. T. 31. No 2. S.44.

2. Losev V.F. Kostnaya plastika alveolyarnogo otrostka verhnej chelyusti s ispolzo-vaniem napravlennoj tkanevoj regeneracii i operacii podnyatiya dna gajmorovoj pazuxi. // Stomatologiya. 2009. No 1. S. 54–59.

3. Zhelezny S.P. Ortopedicheskaya reabilitaciya bolnyh posle osteoplasticheskih operacij na chelyustyah: avtoref. diss. ... d.m.n. – M., 2011. 38 s.

4. Petrovskaya V.V. Luchevaya diagnostika vrozhdennyh rasschelin guby, neba i alveolyarnogo otrostka do i posle kostnoj autoplastiki: dis. ... d.m.n.: 14.01.13 / Petrovskaya Viktoriya Vasilevna. M.: MGMSU, 2017. – 298 s.

5. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. Journal of Pros-thetic Dentistry, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 427–435, 2003.

6. Schropp L., Wenzel A., Kostopoulos L., Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 313–323, 2003.

7. Clementini M., Morlupi A., Canullo L., Agrestini C., Barlattani A. Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxiliofac Surg, 2012; 41 (7): 847–852.

8. Korsch M., Walther W., Robra BP., Sahin A., Hannig M., Bartols A. Pre-implanto-logical treatment routines for alveolar ridge atrophy - an investigation among maxillofacial and oral surgeons in southern Germany. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jul 8;20(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01179-3.

9. Amhadova M.A. Hirurgicheskaya taktika pri ispolzovanii metoda dentalnoj im-plantacii u pacientov s defektami zubnyh ryadov i znachitelnoj atrofiej chelyustej: avtoref. diss. ... doktora med. nauk. – M., 2005. – 48 s.

10. Smbatyan B.S. Vosstanovlenie kostnoj tkani pri lechenii pacientov s ispolzovaniem dentalnyh implantatov v razlichnyh klinicheskih situaciyah: diss. ... d.m.n. – M., 2012. 174 s.

11. Bedretdinov R.M. Kliniko-morfologicheskaya ocenka razlichnyh kostnoplas-ticheskih operacij pered dentalnoj implantaciej (experimentalno-klinicheskoe issledovanie): avtoref. dis. ... k.m.n. – M., 2016. 26 s.

12. Ejzenbraun O.V. Primenenie tunnelnoj texniki kostnoj plastiki u pacientov s atrofiej kostnoj tkani chelyustej: dis. ... k.m.n. – M., 2018. – 257 s.

13. Branemark PI., Adell R., Breine U., Hansson BO., Lindstrom J., Ohlsson A. Intra-os-seous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. // Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 1969; 3 (2): 81–100.

14. Tarnow DP., Eskow RN., Zamzok J. Aesthtics and implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000 1996;11:85–94.

15. Alfaro FH. Bone grafting in Oral Implantology. Techniques and Clinical Applica-tions / F. H. Alfaro. – Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd. 2006. 235 p.

16. Khoury F., Antoun H., Missika P. Bone augmentation in oral implantology. // Grafton Road, New Maldon, UK: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd, 2007. P. 436.

17. Urban IA., Jovanovic S., Lozada JL. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 month after loading. // Int. J.Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2009; 24: 502–510.

18. López-Cedrun JL. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous posterior mandible: the sandwich osteotomy revisited. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 201126(1): 195–202.

19. Urban IA, Montero E, Monje A, Sanz-Sánchez I. Effectiveness of vertical ridge augmentation interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2019;46(21):319–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13061

20. Masahiro Y, Hiroshi E. Current bone substitutes for implant dentistry. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2018;62(2):152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.010

21. Belchenko V.A. Cherepno-licevaya hirurgiya: rukovodstvo dlya vrachej // M.: Medicinskoe informacionnoe agentstvo, 2006. 340 s.

22. Nerobeev A.I., Verbo E.V. Rekonstrukciya litza revaskulyarizovannymi autotrans-plantatami // Medicina. – 2008. – 208 s.

23. Lomakin M.V., Filatova A.S., Soloshhanskij I.I. Napravlennaya kostnaya regen-eraciya pri rekonstrukcii alveolyarnogo kostnogo obema v oblasti dentalnoj implantacii // Rossijskaya stomatologiya. 2011. 4 (5). S. 15–18.

24. Chenosova A.D. Primenenie nestabilizirovannoj gialuronovoj kisloty u pacientov s atrofiej alveolyarnogo otrostka verhnej chelyusti, alveolyarnoj chasti nizhnej chelyusti: avtoref. diss. ... k.m.n. // M., 2020. 21 s.

25. Blomqvist JE., Alberius P., Isaksson S., Linde A., Hansson BG. Factors in implant integration failure after bone grafting: an osteometric and endocrinologic matched analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Feb;25(1):63–8. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(96)80015-4.

26. Tinti C., Parma-Benfenati S. Clinical classification of bone defects concerning the placement of dental implants. Int J Periodont Rest 2003;23:147–155.

27. Schwartz-Arad D., Levin L., Sigal L. Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation. Implant Dent. 2005 Jun; 14(2):131–8. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000165031.33190.0d.

28. Li J., Wang HL. Common implant-related advanced bone grafting complications: classification, etiology, and management. Implant Dent. 2008 Dec; 17(4):389–401.

29. Herford AS., Dean JS. Complications in bone grafting. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Aug; 23(3):433–42.

30. Badalyan V.A., Shor E.I., Elfimova N.V., Apoyan A.A., Bagirov T.M. Opyt primeneni-ya nemedlennoj dentoalveolyarnoj rekonstrukcii v esteticheski znachimoj zone dlya sohraneniya obema kostnoj i myagkoj tkani. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2018;(4):26–29.

31. Jensen OT., Mogyoros R., Owen Z., Cottam JR., Alterman M., Casap N. Island osteoperiosteal flap for alveolar bone reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Mar; 68(3):539–46.

32. Felice P., Marchetti C., Piattelli A., Pellegrino G., Checchi V., Worthington H., Esposito M. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008 Autumn; 1(3):183–98.

33. Felice P., Pistilli R., Zucchelli G., Simion M., Karaban M., Bonifazi L., Barausse C. Decision Criteria Proposed for the Treatment of Vertical Bone Atrophies in the Posterior Mandible. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb; 41(1):71–77.

34. Roccuzzo A., Marchese S., Worsaae N., Jensen SS. The sandwich osteotomy technique to treat vertical alveolar bone defects prior to implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar; 24(3):1073–1089.

35. Matsushima S., Isogai N., Jacquet R. et al. The nature and role of periosteum in bone and cartilage regeneration. Cells, Tissues, Organs, 2011;194(2–4):320–325.

36. Tudor C., Bumiller L., Birkholz T., Stockmann P., Wiltfang J., Kessler P. Static and dynamic periosteal elevation: a pilot study in a pig model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Sep; 39(9):897–903.

37. Dziewiecki D., van de Loo S., Gremse F., Kloss-Brandstätter A., Kloss F., Offer-manns V., Yamauchi K., Kessler P., Lethaus B. Osteoneogenesis due to periosteal elevation with degradable and nondegradable devices in GöttingenMinipigs. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar; 44(3):318–324.

38. Zhang X., Xie C., Lin AS., Ito H., Awad H., Lieberman JR., Rubery PT., Schwarz EM., O’Keefe RJ., Guldberg RE. Periosteal progenitor cell fate in segmental cortical bone graft transplantations: implications for functional tissue engineering. J Bone Miner Res. 2005 Dec; 20(12):2124–2137.

39. Nakahara K., Haga-Tsujimura M., Sawada K., Mottini M., Schaller B., Saulacic N. Periosteal distraction osteogenesis versus immediate periosteal elevation in a rat model: Histological and micro-CT analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 May; 45(5):620–627.

40. Ito R., Matsumiya T., Kon T., Narita N., Kubota K., Sakaki H., Ozaki T., Imaizumi T., Kobayashi W., Kimura H. Periosteum-derived cells respond to mechanical stretch and activate Wnt and BMP signaling pathways. Biomed Res, 2014;35(1):69–79.

41. Kostopoulos L., Karring T., Uraguchi R. Formation of jawbone tuberosities by guid-ed tissue regeneration. An experimental study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1994 Dec;5(4):245–253.

42. Schmidt BL., Kung L., Jones C., Casap N. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002 Oct;60(10):1170–1175.

43. Yamauchi K., Takahashi T., Tanaka K., Nogami S., Kaneuji T., Kanetaka H., Mi-yazaki T., Lethaus B., Kessler P. Self-activated mesh device using shape memory alloy for periosteal expansion osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013 Jul; 101(5):736–742.

44. Saulacic N., Hug C., Bosshardt DD., Schaller B., Buser D., Haeniwa H., Iizuka T. Relative contributions of osteogenic tissues to new bone formation in periosteal distraction osteogenesis: histological and histomorphometrical evaluation in a rat calvaria. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Oct; 15(5):692–706.

45. Saulacic N., Schaller B., Iizuka T., Buser D., Hug C., Bosshardt DD. Analysis of new bone formation induced by periosteal distraction in a rat calvarium model. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr; 15(2):283–291.

46. Saulacic N., Schaller B., Bosshardt DD., Buser D., Jaun P., Haeniwa H., Iizuka T. Periosteal distraction osteogenesis and barrier membrane application: an experimental study in the rat calvaria. J Periodontol. 2012 Jun; 83(6):757–765.