Results of treatment of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation using early and delayed coronary interventions in different age groups
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-17-8-12
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess the treatment results in patients with anterior STEMI using primary PCI in different patient age groups, including those at late hospitalization, taking into account the initial mortality risk (MR). The study included 804 patients with anterior STEMI, aged 28 to 91 years, who were admitted to N. V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine in the period from 2008 to 2017: 583 of them had the primary PCI performed either within the first 12 hours from the disease onset (311 patients) or at late hospitalization: after 12–72 hours (272 patients); and 221 patients treated without PCI. The distribution of patients by age: under 65 years old, 65–75 years old, and over 75 years old was 340, 139, and 104 in the PCI group, and 126, 47, and 48 in the group without PCI, respectively. In 26 death cases after PCI and in 39 of died without interventions, the state of the coronary bed, the affected area, and the immediate cause of death were determined. We have found that in the absence of reperfusion therapy (RT) in STEMI, the initially high baseline MR assessed by TIMI Risk Score corresponds to high mortality. It affects people of predominantly elderly and, especially, senile age, who more often have a proximal lesion of the main coronary arteries, which causes an extensive area of infarction with the development of fatal complications. The use of primary PCIs, including those at late hospitalization, prevents the progression of acute heart failure, the formation of LV aneurysms, and reduces the deaths rate. In different periods of time, the mortality rate with the use of primary PCI, including the delayed ones, fluctuates; it can rise with a significantly increasing number of the hospitalized at senile age. An increase in mortality is associated with complications, including those arising during procedures in severe multivessel coronary artery disease, which is more common in this patient population. Achieving angiographic success even in the absence of ECG signs of reperfusion can significantly reduce mortality in all age groups. High MR is an optimal indication for using delayed procedures. An urgent use of primary PCIs, including those at late hospitalization, allows the optimization of the STEMI treatment, and the achievement of the maximum reduction in mortality.
About the Authors
G. A. GazaryanRussian Federation
Gazaryan George A., DM Sci, professor.
Moscow
G. A. Nefedova
Russian Federation
Nefedova Galina A., Phd Med.
Moscow
L. G. Tyurina
Russian Federation
Tyurina Lyalya G.
Moscow
I. V. Zakharov
Russian Federation
Zakharov Igor, V., Phd Med.
Moscow
A. S. Ermolov
Russian Federation
Ermolov Alexander S., DM Sci, professor, corr. member of RAS.
Moscow
References
1. Altarev S. S., Barabash O. L., Pomeshkina S. A., Kashtalap V. V., Zykov M. V., Tavlueva E. V., Barabash L. S. Reasons for refusing reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Cardiology 2012; 6. P. 4–9.
2. O’Gara P.T., Kushner F. G., Ascheim D. D., et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61. С. 485–510. doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182742c84
3. Ibanez B., James S., Agewall S. et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal. 2018. No. 2. P. 119–177. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
4. Saunderson C. E.D., Brogan R. A., Simms A. D. et al. Acute coronary syndrome management in older adults: guidelines, temporal changes and challenges. Age and Ageing. 2014; 43: P. 450–455. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afu034.
5. Khubutia M. Sh., Gazaryan G. A., Zakharov I. V. Reperfusion therapy in the acute period of myocardial infarction. 2010. P. 134–160.
6. Gazaryan G. A., Chestukhin V. V., Zakharov I. V., Ermolov A. S. Efficiency of percutaneous coronary interventions in the acute period of anterior myocardial infarction, taking into account the different organization of the X-ray endovascular service. Medical Alphabet No. 36/2020. Cardiology and emergency medicine (4). P. 5–10. DOI: 10.33667/2078–56312020–36–5–10.
7. Morrow D. A., Antman E. M., Charlesworth A. et al. TIMI risk score for ST elevation myocardial infarction: a convenient, beside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: an intravenous nPA for treatment of infracting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation. 2000. No. 102. P. 2031–2037. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.17.2031.
8. Amal Hafez Ahmed, Amr elHadidy, Mohamed Helmy, Ashraf Hussein, Abdalla Elagha. Myocardial perfusion grade by coronary angiography can predict final infarct size and left ventricular function in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with a pharmaco-invasive strategy. Open Access Maced J Med Sci & 2021 Mar 01; 9 (B): 184–190.
9. Jose P. S. Henriques, Felix Zijlstra, Arnoud W. J. van’t Hof, Menko-Jan de Boer, Jan-Henk E. Dambrink, Marsel Gosselink et al (2003). Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade. Circulation. 2203; 107 C & 2115–19. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000065221.06430.ED
10. Cyrus Vahdatpour, MD; David Collins, MD; Sheldon Goldberg, MD, FACC. Cardiogenic Shock. Journal of the American Heart Assosiation. 2019; 8e011991. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.119.011991
Review
For citations:
Gazaryan G.A., Nefedova G.A., Tyurina L.G., Zakharov I.V., Ermolov A.S. Results of treatment of myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation using early and delayed coronary interventions in different age groups. Medical alphabet. 2021;(17):8-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-17-8-12