Анализ физико-химической эффективности применения биокерамических силеров в эндодонтической практике
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-12-55-58
Аннотация
Целью данного систематического обзора литературы является детализация основных физико-химических, биологических, эксплуатационных и других знаковых свойств биокерамических материалов, применяемых в эндодонтической практике. По данным изученной литературы можно сказать о том, что биокерамические эндодонтические материалы обладают удовлетворительными эксплуатационными свойствами, характеризуются антимикробным действием и щелочным рН, имеют оптимальную биосовместимость и биоактивность, что говорит о целесообразности их использования в клинической практике врача стоматолога-эндодонтиста.
Об авторах
З. С. Хабадзе
Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов» (РУДН)
Россия
Россия
Доцент, заместитель директора медицинского института
Москва
Ю. А. Генералова
Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов» (РУДН)
Россия
Россия
Студентка стоматологического факультета
Москва
Я. А. Негорелова
Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов» (РУДН)
Россия
Россия
Студентка стоматологического факультета
Москва
Ф. Р. Исмаилов
Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов» (РУДН)
Россия
Россия
Аспирант кафедры терапевтической стоматологии
Москва
Е. С. Шиляева
Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Российский университет дружбы народов» (РУДН)
Россия
Россия
Студентка стоматологического факультета
Москва
Список литературы
1. Afaf AL-Haddad, Zeti A. Che Ab Aziz. Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers: A Review. International Journal of Biomaterials, vol. 2016.
2. Singh G., Gupta I., Elshamy FMM, Boreak N., Homeida H.E. In vitro comparison of antibacterial properties of bioceramic-based sealer, resin-based sealer and zinc oxide eugenol based sealer and two mineral trioxide aggregates. Eur J Dent. 2016;10(3):366–369. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.184145
3. M. Pourhajibagher, A. Bahador. Is antimicrobial agents can considered as effective weapons against endodontic infections by Enterococcus faecalis? Der Pharma Chemica, 7 (2015), pp. 196–200.
4. M.E. Łysakowska, A. Ciebiada-Adamiec, M. Sienkiewicz, J. Sokołowski, K. Banaszek. The cultivable microbiota of primary and secondary infected root canals, their susceptibility to antibiotics and association with the signs and symptoms of infection. Int. Endod. J., 49 (2016), pp. 422–430.
5. Jhajharia K, Parolia A, Shetty KV, Mehta LK. Biofilm in endodontics: A review. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(1):1–12.
6. Vasileios Kapralos, Andreas Koutroulis, Dag Ørstavik, Pia Titterud Sunde, Håkon Valen Rukke. Antibacterial Activity of Endodontic Sealers against Planktonic Bacteria and Bacteria in Biofilms. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 44, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 149–154.
7. Sarah Bukhari, Bekir Karabucak. The Antimicrobial Effect of Bioceramic Sealer on an 8-week Matured Enterococcus faecalis Biofilm Attached to Root Canal Dentinal Surface. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 45, Issue 8, 2019, Pages 1047–1052.
8. Mallya L., Shenoy R., Mala K., Shenoy S. Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of 20% Punica granatum, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite used alone or in combinations against Enterococcus faecalis: An in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(4):367–370.
9. Joo-Hee Shin, Dong-Yul Lee, Sung-Hoon Lee. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of traditional and new developed root sealers against pathogens related root canal, Journal of Dental Sciences, Volume 13, Issue 1, 2018, p. 54–59.
10. Candeiro, GTM, Moura-Netto, C, D’Almeida-Couto, RS, Azambuja-Júnior, N, Marques, MM, Cai, S, Gavini, G. Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and antibacterial effectiveness of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. International Endodontic Journal, 49, 858– 864, 2016.
11. Zhejun Wang, Ya Shen, Markus Haapasalo. Dentin Extends the Antibacterial Effect of Endodontic Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms, Journal of Endodontics, Volume 40, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 505–508.
12. Alsubait, S., Albader, S., Alajlan, N. et al. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a confocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis. Odontology 107, 513–520 (2019).
13. Vibha H. et al. Assessment of antimicrobial efficacy of bioceramic sealer, epiphany self-etch sealer, and AH-Plus sealer against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study. Endodontology. – 2017. – Т. 29. – №. 2. – Р. 151.
14. Karen F. Lovato, Christine M. Sedgley. Antibacterial Activity of EndoSequence Root Repair Material and ProRoot MTA against Clinical Isolates of Enterococcus faecalis. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 37, Issue 11, 2011, p. 1542–1546.
15. Jafari F., Jafari S., Etesamnia P. Genotoxicity, Bioactivity and Clinical Properties of Calcium Silicate Based Sealers: A Literature Review. Iran Endod J. 2017;12(4):407– 413.
16. Sasha Dimitrova-Nakov, Emel Uzunoglu, Hector Ardila-Osorio, Anne Baudry, Gilles Richard, Odile Kellermann, Michel Goldberg. In vitro bioactivity of Bioroot™ RCS, via A4 mouse pulpal stem cells. Dental Materials, Volume 31, Issue 11, 2015, p. 1290–1297.
17. Dalia Mukhtar-Fayyad. Cytocompatibility of new bioceramic-based materials on human fibroblast cells (MRC-5). Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Volume 112, Issue 6, 2011, Pages e137-e142.
18. Jean Camps, Charlotte Jeanneau, Ikbale El Ayachi, Patrick Laurent, Imad About. Bioactivity of a Calcium Silicate–based Endodontic Cement (BioRoot RCS): Interactions with Human Periodontal Ligament Cells In Vitro. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 41, Issue 9, 2015. Pages 1469–1473.
19. Zordan-Bronzel, CL, Tanomaru-Filho, M, Rodrigues, EM, Chávez-Andrade, GM, Faria, G, Guerreiro-Tanomaru, JM. Cytocompatibility, bioactive potential and antimicrobial activity of an experimental calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer. International Endodontic Journal, 52, 979– 986, 2019.
20. Shen, Y., Peng, B., Yang, Y., Ma, J. and Haapasalo, M. (2015), What do different tests tell about the mechanical and biological properties of bioceramic materials?. Endod Topics, 32: 47–85.
21. Christin Michelle Giacomino, James A. Wealleans, Natalia Kuhn, Anibal Diogenes. Comparative Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Two Bioceramic Sealers. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 45, Issue 1, 2019. Pages 51–56.
22. Basavanna R.S. et al. Nonsurgical healing of periapical lesion using single cone with bioceramic sealer. International Journal of Oral Health Sciences. – 2019. – Т. 9. – №. 1. – P. 49.
23. Colombo M., Poggio C., Dagna A. et al. Biological and physico-chemical properties of new root canal sealers. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018;10(2):e120-e126. Published 2018 Feb 1. doi:10.4317/jced.54548
24. Seok-Woo Chang, So-Youn Lee, Soo-Kyung Kang, Kee-Yeon Kum, Eun-Cheol Kim. In Vitro Biocompatibility, Inflammatory Response, and Osteogenic Potential of 4 Root Canal Sealers: Sealapex, Sankin Apatite Root Sealer, MTA Fillapex, and iRoot SP Root Canal Sealer. Journal of Endodontics, Volume 40, Issue 10, 2014. Pages 1642–1648.
25. López-García S., Pecci-Lloret M.R., Guerrero-Gironés J., Pecci-Lloret M.P., Lozano A., Llena C., Rodríguez-Lozano F.J., Forner L. Comparative Cytocompatibility and Mineralization Potential of Bio-C Sealer and TotalFill BC Sealer. Materials 2019, 12, 3087.
26. Seo, D.-G.; Lee, D.; Kim, Y.-M.; Song, D.; Kim, S.-Y. Biocompatibility and Mineralization Activity of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells. Materials 2019, 12, 2482.
27. Kim, Y.; Kim, B.-S.; Kim, Y.-M.; Lee, D.; Kim, S.-Y. The Penetration Ability of Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealers into Dentinal Tubules Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study. Materials 2019, 12, 531.
28. Aktemur Türker S., Uzunoğlu E., Purali N. Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018;12(4):294–298.
29. Arikatla S.K., Chalasani U., Mandava J., Yelisela R.K. Interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of bioceramic endodontic sealers. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(4):373–377.
30. Akcay M., Arslan H., Durmus N., Mese M. and Capar I.D. (2016) Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: A confocal microscopic study. Lasers Surg. Med., 48: 70–76.
31. Ulusoy Ö.İ., Paltun Y.N., Güven N., Çelik B. Dislodgement resistance of calcium silicate-based materials from root canals with varying thickness of dentine. International Endodontic Journal, 49, 1188–1193, 2016.
32. Candeiro, George Táccio de Miranda, Lavor, Amanda Bezerra, Lima, Ilana Thaís de Freitas, Vasconcelos, Bruno Carvalho de, Gomes, Nilton Vivacqua, Iglecias, Elaine Faga, & Gavini, Giulio. (2019). Penetration of bioceramic and epoxy-resin endodontic cements into lateral canals. Brazilian Oral Research, 33, e049. Epub May 27, 2019.
33. Alfawaz, H., Alqedairi, A., Alebdi, A., Allahem, Z., Alsubait, S., & Alharbi, H. (2019). Bond strength of bioroot rcs relative to different endodontic bioceramic sealers: in vitro push-out test. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 38(4), 528–531.
34. Amanda, Bina, Endang Suprastiwi, and Munyati Usman. Comparison of apical leakage in root canal obturation using bioceramic and Polydimethylsiloxane sealer (In vitro). Open journal of stomatology 8.01 (2018): 24.
35. Ballullaya, Srinidhi V., et al. Stereomicroscopic dye leakage measurement of six different root canal sealers. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 11.6 (2017): ZC65.
36. Baghdadi, Inaam, et al. Physiochemical properties of a bioceramic-based root canal sealer reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes, titanium carbide and boron nitride biomaterials. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials (2020): 103892.
37. Lee, Ju Kyung et al. Physicochemical properties of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers. Bioinorganic chemistry and applications 2017 (2017).
38. Grech, L., B. Mallia, and J. Camilleri. Investigation of the physical properties of tricalcium silicate cement-based root-end filling materials. Dental Materials 29.2 (2013): e20–e28.
39. Poggio, Claudio, et al. Solubility and pH of bioceramic root canal sealers: a comparative study. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry9.10 (2017): e1189.
40. Al-Haddad, Afaf, and Zeti A. Che Ab Aziz. «Bioceramic-based root canal sealers: a review.» International journal of biomaterials 2016 (2016)
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Хабадзе З.С., Генералова Ю.А., Негорелова Я.А., Исмаилов Ф.Р., Шиляева Е.С. Анализ физико-химической эффективности применения биокерамических силеров в эндодонтической практике. Медицинский алфавит. 2021;1(12):55-58. https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-12-55-58
For citation:
Khabadze Z.S., Generalova Yu.A., Negorelova Y.A., Ismailov F.R., Shilyaeva E.S. Analysis of the physico-chemical efficiency of the bioceramic silers application in endodontic practice. Medical alphabet. 2021;1(12):55-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-12-55-58
Просмотров: 284
Послать статью по эл. почте 