Techniques and materials used to optimize attached gingiva size: literature review
Z. S. Khabadze,
A. B. Adzhieva,
A. A. Nedashkovsky,
Yu. A. Generalova,
M. G. Sherozia,
E. S. Shilyaeva https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-12-42-47
Abstract
The aim of this review was to examine the techniques for performing keratinized gingival augmentation and grafts, as well as the materials used, which are often required to ensure proper wound closure. Tissue engineering of the oral mucosa represents an interesting alternative to obtain sufficient autologous tissue to repair oral soft tissue defects using biodegradable scaffolds and can improve vascularization and epithelialization, which are critical for successful outcomes.
About the Authors
Z. S. Khabadze
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Associate Professor, Deputy Director of the Medical Institute
Moscow
A. B. Adzhieva
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student of the Department of Surgical Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
Moscow
A. A. Nedashkovsky
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Student of the Faculty of Dentistry
Moscow
Yu. A. Generalova
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Student of the Faculty of Dentistry
Moscow
M. G. Sherozia
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Student of the Faculty of Dentistry
Moscow
E. S. Shilyaeva
RUDN University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Student of the Faculty of Dentistry
Moscow
References
1. Rourke K., McKinny S., St Martin B. Effect of wound closure on buccal mucosal graft harvest site morbidity: Results of a randomized prospective trial. Urology. 2012;79:443–447.
2. Blok C.S., Vink L., de Boer E.M. et al. Autologous skin substitute for hard-to-heal ulcers: Retrospective analysis on safety, applicability, and efficacy in an outpatient and hospitalized setting. Wound Repair Regen. 2013;21:667–676.
3. Faleris J.A., Hernandez R.M., Wetzel D. et al. In-vivo and in-vitro histological evaluation of two commercially available acellular dermal matrices. Hernia. 2011; 15:147–156.
4. Adamakis I., Tyritzis S.I., Stravodimos K.G. et al. A novel approach for the surgical management of Peyronie’s disease using an acellular, human dermis tissue graft: Preliminary results. World J Urol. 2011; 29:399–403.
5. Rössner E., Smith M.D., Petschke B. et al. Epiflex() a new decellularized human skin tissue transplant: Manufacture and properties. Cell Tissue Bank. 2011;12: 209–217.
6. Roessner E.D., Vitacolonna M., Hohenberger P. Confocal laser scanning microscopy evaluation of an acellular dermis tissue transplant (Epiflex). PLoS One. 2012;7:e45991.
7. Nevins M., Nevins M.L., Kim S.W. et al. The use of mucograft collagen matrix to augment the amount of keratinized tissue around teeth: A pilot study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31: 367–373.
8. Vignoletti F., Nunez J., Discepoli N. et al. Clinical and histological healing of a new collagen matrix in combination with the coronally advanced flap for the treatment of Miller class-i recession defects: An experimental study in the minipig. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:847–855.
9. Sonntag R., Reinders J., Kretzer J.P. What’s next? alternative materials for articulation in total joint replacement. Acta Biomater. 2012;8:2434–2441.
10. Friberg B., Jemt T. Soft tissue augmentation in connection to dental implant treatment using a synthetic, porous materialdA case series with a 6-month followup. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14: 872–881.
11. Kaner D., Friedmann A. Soft tissue expansion with self-filling osmotic tissue expanders before vertical ridge augmentation: A proof of principle study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:95–101.
12. Dhadse P.V., Yeltiwar R.K., Bhongade M.L. et al. Soft tissue expansion before vertical ridge augmentation: Inflatable silicone balloons or self-filling osmotic tissue expanders? J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014;18:433–440.
13. Mertens C., Thiele O., Engel M. et al. The use of self-inflating soft tissue expanders prior to bone augmentation of atrophied alveolar ridges. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:44–51.
14. Park S.H., Choi S.K., Jang J.H. et al. Self-inflating oral tissue expander for ridge augmentation in the severely atrophic mandible. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;39:31–34.
15. Abrahamsson P., Isaksson S., Andersson G. Guided bone generation in a rabbit mandible model after periosteal expansion with an osmotic tissue expander. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:1282–1288.
16. Jenq T.F., Hilliard S.M., Kuang A.A. Novel use of osmotic tissue expanders to treat difficult anterior palatal fistulas. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48:217–221.
17. Wysocki M., Kobus K., Szotek S. et al. Biomechanical effect of rapid mucoperiosteal palatal tissue expansion with the use of osmotic expanders. J Biomech. 2011;44:1313–1320.
18. Gronovich Y., Tuchman I., Binenboym R. et al. Reconstruction with an osmotic tissue expander in pediatric patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129: 863e–865e.
19. Levine R.A., Huynh-Ba G., Cochran D.L. Soft tissue augmentation procedures for mucogingival defects in esthetic sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29 (suppl):155–185.
20. Gupta V., Bains V.K., Mohan R. et al. Bridge flap technique as a single-step solution to mucogingival problems: A case series. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2: 110–114.
21. Uijlenbroek H.J., Liu Y., He J.F. et al. Expanding soft tissue with Osmed tissue expanders in the goat maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:121–128.
22. Abad-Gallegos M., Figueiredo R., Rodríguez-Baeza A. et al. Use of Bichat’s buccal fat pad for the sealing of orosinusal communications. A presentation of 8 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e215–219.
23. Meyer E., Liebenberg S.J., Fagan J.J. Buccal fat paddA simple, underutilized flap. S Afr J Surg. 2012;50:47–49.
24. Agarwal C., Gayathri G.V., Metha D.S. An innovative technique for root coverage using pedicled buccal fat pad. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014;5:386–388.
25. Fu J.H., Su C.Y., Wang H.L. Esthetic soft tissue management for teeth and implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12: 129–142.
26. Craft R.O., Rebecca A.M., Flahive C. et al. Does size matter? Technical considerations of a regenerative tissue matrix for use in reconstructive surgery. Can J Plast Surg. 2011;19:51–52.
27. Baxter R.A. Long-term follow-up with AlloDerm in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Globe Open. 2013; 1:1–2.
28. Butterfield J.L. 440 Consecutive immediate, implant-based, single-surgeon breast reconstructions in 281 patients: A comparison of early outcomes and costs between SurgiMend fetal bovine and AlloDerm human cadaveric acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131: 940–951.
29. Shi L.J., Wang Y., Yang C. et al. Application of acellular dermal matrix in reconstruction of oral mucosal defects in 36 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70: e586–591.
30. Almazrooa S.A., Noonan V., Woo S.B. Resorbable collagen membranes: Histopathologic features. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014;118:236–240.
31. Nocini P.F., Castellani R., Zanotti G. et al. Extensive keratinized tissue augmentation during implant rehabilitation after Le Fort I osteotomy: Using a new porcine collagen membrane (Mucoderm). J Craniofac Surg. 2013;2:799–803.
32. Jenabian N., Haghanifar S., Maboudi A. et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Bio-Gen with biocollagen compared with Bio-Gen with connective tissue in the treatment of class II furcation defects: A randomized clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21:422–429.
33. Schlee M., Ghanaati S., Willershausen I. et al. Bovine pericardium based noncross linked collagen matrix for successful root coverage, a clinical study in human. Head Face Med. 2012;8:6.
34. Guo J., Chen H., Wang Y. et al. A novel porcine acellular dermal matrix scaffold used in periodontal regeneration. Int J Oral Sci. 2013;5:37–43.
35. Ge S., Zhao N., Wang L. et al. Effects of hydroxyapatite nanostructure on channel surface of porcine acellular dermal matrix scaffold on cell viability and osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2013;8:1887–1895.
36. Ko Y., Kim N., Park S. et al. Use of Artelon() Cosmetic in soft tissue augmentation in dentistry. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2011;3:33–37.
37. Mohammadi M., Mofid R., Shokrgozar M.A. Peri-implant soft tissue management through use of cultured gingival graft: A case report. Acta Med Iran. 2011;49:319–324.
38. Marston W.A., Hanft J., Norwood P. et al. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: Results of a prospective randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2013;26:1701–1705.
39. Tetteh G., Khan A.S., Delaine-Smith R.M. et al. Electrospun polyurethane/hydroxyapatite bioactive scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: The role of solvent and hydroxyapatite particles. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;39:95–110.
40. Iafiscol M., Quirici N., Foltran I. et al. Electrospun collagen mimicking the reconstituted extracellular matrix improves osteoblastic differentiation onto titanium surfaces. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013; 13:4720–4726.
41. Jin G., Prabhakaran M.P., Ramakrishna S. Stem cell differentiation to epidermal lineages on electrospun nanofibrous substrates for skin tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011;7: 3113–3122.
42. Felder J.M., Goyal S.S., Attinger C.E. A systematic review of skin substitutes for foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130:145–164.
43. Zeng Q., Macri L.K., Prasad A. et al.Skin tissue engineering.Comprehen Biomat.2011;5:467–499.
44. Moharamzadeh K., Colley H., Murdoch C. et al. Tissue-engineered oral mucosa. J Dent Res. 2012;91:642–650.
45. Izumi K., Neiva R.F., Feinberg S.E. Intraoral grafting of tissue-engineered human oral mucosa. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28:e295–303.
46. Kim R.Y., Fasi A.C., Feinberg S.E. Soft tissue engineering in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2014;4:4–8.
47. Kuo S., Zhou Y., Kim H.M. et al. Biochemical Indicators of Implantation Success of tissue-engineered oral mucosa. J Dent Res. 2015;94:78–84.
48. Venediktov A.A., Dolgalev A.A., Kruchinina A.D., Brusnitsyn D.A., Yudicheva Yu.A. / Analysis of physical and mechanical parameters of membranes based on extracellular collagen matrix for targeted tissue regeneration // Medical alphabet, No. 2 (339), 2018. Volume No. 1, Dentistry, pp. 48–52.
49. Dolgalev A.A. The study of biointegration and biodegradation of collagen matrix on an in vivo model under conditions of orthotopic implantation / A. A. Dolgalev, A. A. Ayrapetyan, E. M. Boyko // Medical alphabet. 2018. – Volume 4. № 34. – S. 8–15.
50. Dolgalev A.A. Investigation of the biocompatibility of a material based on the submucosa of the small intestine in in vitro and in vivo tests / A.A. Dolgalev, A.A. Venediktov, D.V. Bobryshev, A.D. Kruchinina, A.A. Chagarov, Ya. V. Evstratova, A.I. Zvyagina, K.S. Krasnov, I.S. Fadeeva, G.A. Airapetov // Genes and cells. – T. XIV. – 2019. – № 2. – P. 47–51. DOI: 10.23868/201906018 Scopus.
51. Adzhieva A.B., Khabadze Z.S., Yollybayev Y.A., Hossain S.J. Use of a volumetric-stable collagen matrix to correct soft tissue volume. Endodontics Today. 2020;18(4):65–68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2020-18-4-65-68.
Review
For citations:
Khabadze Z.S., Adzhieva A.B., Nedashkovsky A.A., Generalova Yu.A., Sherozia M.G., Shilyaeva E.S. Techniques and materials used to optimize attached gingiva size: literature review. Medical alphabet. 2021;1(12):42-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-12-42-47
Views:
305
Email this article 