Rationale for the use of a design of Emax CAD on an endodontically treated tooth. Clinical case
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-35-13-15
Abstract
Elimination of aesthetic and functional tooth disorders is one of the most popular areas in the daily practice of a dentist. The desire to achieve an ideal aesthetic result plays an important role in the choice of material for restoration. Replacing lost tooth tissues in aesthetically demanding patients is a very difficult task, for the dentist and for the restoration material.
About the Authors
E. V. Urusov
The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University under Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The State Education Institution of Higher Professional Training
Moscow
A. L. Makarov
The State Education Institution of Higher Professional Training The First Sechenov Moscow State Medical University under Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry
Moscow
Y. S. Kozlova
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN Univesity)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Department of Propaedeutics of Dental Diseases
Moscow
References
1. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel- restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 321-9.
2. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post- andcore systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 8: 262-9.
3. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 10–15.
4. Sorensen JA, Engleman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 419–424.
5. Testori T, Bandino M, Castagnola M. Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth : a clinical survey of 36 cases. J Endod 1993; 19: 87–91.
6. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Hetmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strenght of newer types of endodontic post. J Dent 1999; 27: 275–278.
7. Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistence to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431– 437.
8. Vulievi Z, Todorovi A, Anelkovi S, Mandi N. Mogunost nadogradnje devitalizovanih zuba kompozitima ojaanim staklenim vlaknima – prikaz sluaja. VII Simpozijum protetiara Srbije, Zlatibor 2000.
9. Bindl A, Mörmann WH. Clinical evaluation of adhesively placed Cerec endo-crowns after 2 years – preliminary results. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1(3):255-65.
10. Biacchi GR, Basting RT. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retajned conventinal crowns. Oper Dent. 2012;37(2):130-6.
11. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14(4):355-63.
12. Zogheib LV, Saavedra Gde S, Cardoso PE, Valera MC, Araújo MA. Resistance to compression of weakened roots subjected to different root reconstruction protocols. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(6):648- 54.
13. Fernandes AS, Dessai GS. Factors affecting the fracture resistance of post-core reconstructed teeth: a review. Int J Prosthodont. 2001;14(4):355-63.
Review
For citations:
Urusov E.V., Makarov A.L., Kozlova Y.S. Rationale for the use of a design of Emax CAD on an endodontically treated tooth. Clinical case. Medical alphabet. 2020;(35):13-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-35-13-15
Views:
272
Email this article 