First experience with MRI-guided vacuum aspirated breast biopsy
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-29-25-31
Abstract
The rate of detection of breast cancer by MRI, while other methods of radiological diagnosis are not sufficiently informative, ranges from 5.2 to 26.3 per cent. Suspicious breast tumors of category BI-RADS 4, 5 show morphological image-guided biopsy verification, in particular MRI with contrast. Purpose. To show the possibilities and features of carrying out MRI-guided vacuum breast biopsy, including after aesthetic breast augmentation. Material and methods. A comprehensive X-ray, ultrasound and MRI examination of 54 women aged between 28 and 70 years with different breast tumors was conducted. Of these, five were detected only by breast MRI with contrast, and were morphologically verified by MRI-guided vacuum aspiration biopsy. Results. 14 of the 54 patients with breast mass were diagnosed with breast cancer and 26 were diagnosed with benign diseases. The effectiveness of comprehensive examination and low-invasive high-tech MRI-guided procedures in early refined screening for breast cancer, including after aesthetic breast augmentation, has been demonstrated. MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy is a fast, safe and accurate diagnostic method of morphological verification of suspicious breast tumors that do not have X-ray and ultrasound.
About the Authors
M. L. Mazo
Moscow Research Institute n.a. P.A. Herzen - a Branch of the National Medical Radiological Research Centre
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
O. E. Jacobs
Ilyinskaya Hospital
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
O. S. Puchkova
Ilyinskaya Hospital; Medical Scientific and Educational Centre at Moscow State University n.a. M.V. Lomonosov
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
M. V. Feldsherov
Guta-Clinic Co.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
E. V. Kondratyev
National Medical Research Centre for Surgery n.a. A.V. Vishnevsky
Russian Federation
Moscow.
Russian Federation
Moscow.
References
1. N. Peters, R. Borel, N. Zuithoff, W. Mali, K. Moons, P. Peeters. Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of breast lesions. Radiology, 246 (2008), pp. 116-124.
2. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46: 1296-1316. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015.
3. Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26: 3248-3258. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108.
4. Warner E, Messersmith H, Causer P, et al. Systematic review: using magnetic resonance imaging to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008; 148: 671-679. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-9-200805060-00007.
5. Spick C, Baltzer PAT. Diagnostic utility of second-look US for breast lesions identified at MR imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2014; 273: 401-409. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140474.
6. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: guidelines from the European society of breast imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18: 1307-1318. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-0863-7.
7. Rauch GM, Dogan BE, Smith TB, et al. Outcome analysis of 9-gauge MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle breast biopsies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198: 292-299. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.7594.
8. Imschweiler T, Haueisen H, Kampmann G, et al. MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24: 128-135. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2989-5.
9. Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, et al. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006; 106: 982-990. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21720.
10. Heywang-KobrunnerSH, Heinig A, Schaumloffel U, et al. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9: 1656-1665. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050905.
11. Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X, et al. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2002; 12: 1463-1470. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1376-4.
12. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Fast MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181: 1283-1293. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.5.1811283.
13. Lehman CD, Deperi ER, Peacock S, et al. Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 1782-1787. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.6.01841782.
14. Для цитирования: Мазо М. Л., Якобс О. Э., Пучкова О. С., Фельдшеров М. В., Кондратьев Е. В. Первый опыт применения вакуумной аспирационной биопсии молочной железы под МТР-наведением. Медицинский алфавит. 2020; (29): 25-31. https://doi.org/l0.33667/2078-563l-2020-29-25-3l
15. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E, et al. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 183-193. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.185.1.01850183.
16. Orel SG, Rosen M, Mies C, Schnall MD. MR imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology. 2006; 238: 54-61. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2381050050.
17. Lee J-M, Kaplan JB, Murray MP, et. Imaging histologic discordance at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast al biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189: 852-859. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2531.
18. Schrading S, Simon B, Braun M, et al. MRI-guided breast biopsy: influence of choice of vacuum biopsy system on the mode of biopsy of MRI-only suspicious breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 1650-1657. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2550.
19. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D, et al. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 684-690. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.06.0809.
20. Malhaire C, El Khoury C, Thibault F, et al. Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 1554-1562. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1707-9.
21. Han B-K, Schnall MD, Orel SG, Rosen M. Outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191: 1798-1804. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2827.
22. Crystal P, Sadaf A, Bukhanov K, et al. High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: can underestimation be predicted? Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 582-589. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1949-6.
23. Lee CH, Smith RC, Levine JA, Troiano RN, Tocino I. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173: 1323-1329. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.5.10541112.
24. ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the breast. Available from: www.acr.org/~/me-dia/2a0eb28eb59041e2825179afb72ef624.pdf.
25. Mann RM, Kuhl CK, Kinkel K, Boetes C. Breast MRI: Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008; 18: 1307-1318. DOI: 10.1007/ s00330-008-0863-7.
26. Lee CH. Problem solving MR imaging of the breast. Radiol Clin N Am. 2004; 42: 919-934. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2004.05.001.
27. Sardanelli F, Mealni E, Ottonello C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in characterizing positive or uncertain mammographic findings. Cancer Detect Prev. 1998; 22: 39-42. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1500.1998.00005.x.
28. Olsen ML, Morton MJ, Stan DL, Pruthi S. Is there a role for magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing palpable breast masses when mammogram and ultrasound are negative? J Women's Health. 2012; 21: 1149-1154. DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3735.
Review
For citations:
Mazo M.L., Jacobs O.E., Puchkova O.S., Feldsherov M.V., Kondratyev E.V. First experience with MRI-guided vacuum aspirated breast biopsy. Medical alphabet. 2020;(29):25-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-29-25-31
Views:
922
Email this article 