Bilateral total hip arthroplasty for secondary protrusive coxitis (clinical case)
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-15-29-32
Abstract
The presence of combined joint contractures, the development of secondary protrusive coxarthritis (PC), severe osteoporosis and bone destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis produce a number of technical difficulties during the implementation of total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this article we have presented a clinical case of bilateral cementless THA performed in a patient with RA and secondary PC. Before surgery the functional Harris score was 20 points, and the DA-S28 (disease activity score) was 3.1. The patient had PC of the third degree on the right and the second degree on the left side. During THA on the right side we applied the technique of impact bone autoplasty. Four years after surgery, the functional Harris score was 73; DAS‑28 was 2.7. Thus, the combination of conservative therapy and surgical treatment improves patient's clinical and functional state and also helps to maintain low activity of RA.
About the Authors
D. V. Volchenko
State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
I. F. Akhtyamov
Kazan State Medical University
Russian Federation
Kazan
Russian Federation
Kazan
A. Yu. Terskov
State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. A. Sozonov
State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. N. Velichko
State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
Yu. D. Udalov
State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
E. Ya. Schpiz
State Research Center − Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center of the FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Р. М. Тихилов, И. И. Шубняков, А. Н. Коваленко, А. Ж. Черный, Ю. В. Муравьева, М. Ю. Гончаров // Данные регистра эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава РНИИТО им. Р.Р. Вредена за 2007–2012 годы / Травматология и ортопедия России. 2013. Т. 69, № 3, С. 167–190. DOI: 10.21823/2311–2905–2013–3–167–190.
2. Овчинников Е.Н., Стогов М.В., Чегуров О.К. Медицинские регистры как инструмент менеджмента качества: аналитический обзор // Экономический анализ: теория и практика. 2016. Т. 455, № 3. С. 98–107.
3. Д. В. Волченко, Е.Ш. Ломтатидзе, В. Е. Ломтатидзе, Ю. В. Грошев, С. В. Поцелуйко, М.И. Круглов, Д.П. Попов // Реконструктивное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава / Травматология и ортопедия России. 2006. Т. 40, № 2. С. 66–67.
4. Otto A. W. Pfannenbeckenmissgestaltung Infolge deformierender Osteoarthritis in neue Seltene // Beobachtungen sur Anatomie, Physiologie und Pathologie gehorig. 1816. P. 19–20.
5. Overgaard K. Otto’s disease and other forms of protrusio acetabuli // Acta Radiologica. 1935. Vol. 16, P. 390–419.
6. Gilmour J. Adolescent deformities of the acetabulum: an investigation into the nature of protrusion acetabula // British Journal of Surgery. 1939. Vol. 26. P. 670–699.
7. M. T. Mcbride, M.P. Muldoon, F. Richard, R. T. Trousdale, D.R. Wenger // Protrusio Acetabuli: Diagnosis and Treatment / J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2001. Vol. 9, No. 2. P. 79–88. DOI: 10.5435/00124635–200103000–00002.
8. Sotelo-Garza A., Charnley J. The results of Charnley arthroplasty of the hip performed for protrusio acetabula // Clin. Orthop. 1978. Vol. 132, P. 12–18.
9. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty // J. Bone Jt. Surg. 1969. Vol. 51A, No. 4. P. 737–755.
10. M. Prevoo, M.A. Hof, H.H. Kuper, M.A. Leeuwen, L.B. Putte, P.L. Riel // Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis / Arthritis Rheum. 1995. Vol. 38, P. 44–48. DOI: 10.1002/art.1780380107.
11. W.W. Rosenberg, B.W. Schreurs, M.C. Waal Malefijt, R.P. Veth, T.J. Slooff // Impacted morsellized bone grafting and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular protrusion in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an 8- to 18-year follow-up study of 36 hips / Acta Orthop. Scand. 2000. Vol. 71, No. 2. P. 143–146. DOI: 10.1080/000164700317413102.
12. R. E. Zwartele, S. Witjes, H. C. Doets, T. Stijnen, R.G. Poll // Cementless total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature / Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2012. Vol. 132, No. 4. P. 535–546. DOI: 10.1007/s00402–011–1432–0.
13. Hastings D. E., Parker S.M. Protrusio acetabuli in rheumatoid arthritis // Clin. Orthop. 1975. Vol. 108, P. 76–89. DOI: 10.1097/00003086–197505000–00012.
14. J. Dutka, P. Sosin, P. Skowronek, M. Skowronek // Total hip arthroplasty with bone grafts for protrusio acetabuli / Ortop. Traumatol. Rehabil. 2011. Vol. 13, No. 5. P. 469–477. DOI: 10.5604/15093492.967224.
15. Y.Q. Mao, Y.H. Sun, Y. Wang, J. Tang, Z.A. Zhu // The total hip arthroplasty for protrusio acetabuli / Chinese Journal of Orthopedics. 2011. Vol. 31, P. 143–148.
16. Tang S. J., Liu W., Li X.H. Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of acetabular protrusion secondary to rheumatoid arthritis // Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research. 2013. Vol. 41, P. 44–51.
17. E. Garcia-Cimbrelo, A. Diaz-Martin, R. Madero, L. Munera // Loosening of the cup after low-friction arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion. The importance of the position of the cup / J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000. Vol. 82, No. 1. P. 108–115. DOI: 10.1302/0301–620x.82b1.9796.
18. S. J. Guo, Y. Huang, H. Tang, J.M. Gu, D. J. Yang, Y.X. Zhou // Early outcomes of reconstruction of Paprosky III acetabular bone defects using tantalum trabecular metal cup combined with tantalum augment / Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics. 2016. Vol. 36, P. 1479–1486.
19. Г.М. Кавалерский, В.Ю. Мурылев, Я.А. Рукин, А. В. Лычагин, П.М. Елизаров // Применение индивидуальных вертлужных компонентов при ревизионном эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава / Травматология и ортопедия России. 2016. T. 22, № 4. C. 114–121. DOI: 10.21823/2311–2905–2016–22–4–114–121.
20. И.И. Кузьмин, И.Ф. Ахтямов, О.И. Кузьмин, М.А. Кислицын // Эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава с применением укрепляющих колец Мюллера / Гений ортопедии. 2005. № 1. C. 9–12.
21. А.Н. Коваленко, И.И. Шубняков, С.С. Билык, Р.М. Тихилов // Современные технологии лечения тяжелых костных дефектов в области вертлужной впадины: какие проблемы решают индивидуальные имплантаты? / Политравма. 2017. № 1. C. 72-–81.
Review
For citations:
Volchenko D.V., Akhtyamov I.F., Terskov A.Yu., Sozonov O.A., Velichko M.N., Udalov Yu.D., Schpiz E.Ya. Bilateral total hip arthroplasty for secondary protrusive coxitis (clinical case). Medical alphabet. 2020;(15 (2020)):29-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-15-29-32
Views:
672
Email this article 