Changes in the electrocardiogram with focal myocardial damage
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-14-19-31
Abstract
The present report introduces the electrophysiological conception of charging current in myocardium, alteration of ECG in different intensity of necrosis of myocardium, introduces parameter of topical diagnostics of focal changing of myocardium. Numerous clinical-ECG examples show specific ECG patterns in diagnostics of different types of myocardial infarction.
About the Author
G. V. Ryabykina
NRC of Cadiology’ of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Четвертое универсальное определение инфаркта миокарда (2018)/ ESC, ACCF, AHA,WHF, 2018) — Российский кардиологический ж. — 2019; — 24(3).
2. Schafer H, Pena A, and Scholmerich P. Der monophasische actionsstrom von spitze und basis des warmbluterherzens und die theorie der T-welle des EKG. Pflugers Arch., — 1943 — 246 — 728–745.
3. Prinzmetal M.,Kennamer R., Shaw et all. Intramural depolarization potentials in myocardial infarction. The coronary QS wave.// Circulation, — 1953. — Vol. 7. — P 1.
4. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction/ European Heart Journal (2018) 00, 1–33.
5. Johnson W. J., Anchor R. W., Burchell H. B., Edwards J. E. Unrecognized myocardial infarction; a clinicopathologic study. AMA Arch. Intern. Med., — 1959, — 103 —253–261.
6. Дорофеева З. З. Регистрация и оценка электрических свойств сердца. В кн.: Руководство по кардиологии, под ред. Е. И. Чазова, т. 2. М.: Медицина, — 1982. — C.139-342.
7. Chou T. Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice. N.Y. Grune and Stratton, — 1979.
8. Task Force for the redefinition of myocardial infarction Eur.Heart J. — 2007. — Vol.28. — P. 2525–2538.
9. Macfarline P., Oosterom A., Janse M. Et all. Electrocardiology Comprehensive Clinical ECG . Springer/ London — 2012.
10. Рябыкина Г. В., Алесенко Д. В., Соболев А. В. Причины низкой чувствительности ЭКГ-диагностики нижне-заднего и задне-бокового инфаркта Вестник кардиологии. — 2019 — 4.
11. Wagner G. S., Freye C. J., Palmeri S. T., et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. I. Specificity and observer agreement. Circulation. — 1982 — 65 — P. 342–347.
12. Palmeri S. T., Harrison D. G., Cobb R., et al. A QRS scoring system for assessing left ventricular function after myocardial infarction. N. Engl. 1. Med. — 1982 — 306 — с. 4–9.
13. Roark S. F., Ideker R. E., Wagner G. S., et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size.III. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for inferior infarcts. Am. /. Cardiol., — 1953 — 51 — 382–389.
14. Ward R. M., White R. D. Jdeker R. E., et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. IV. Correlalion with quantitative anatomic findings for posterolateral infarcts. Am. J. Cardiol., — 1984 — 53 — 706–714.
15. Ideker R. E., Wagner G. S., Selvester R. H. Anatomic validation of computer model ECG criteria for infarct size and location, in Computeized Interpretation of ECG VII, Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Conference, M. M. Laks. Editor. New York: Engineering Foundation, — 1982, — pp. 147–152.
16. Де Луна А. Б. Руководство по клинической ЭКГ Москва, Медицина. — 1993. — 704 стр.
17. Ратиб К., Бхатиа Г., Юрен Д. под ред. С. Н. Терещенко. Неотложная кардиология. — 2015.
Review
For citations:
Ryabykina G.V. Changes in the electrocardiogram with focal myocardial damage. Medical alphabet. 2020;1(14):19-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-14-19-31
Views:
5245
Email this article 