Use of mobile applications assessing motor activity of patients after myocardial infarction for improving indicators of physical rehabilitation
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-2-21(396)-28-33
Abstract
Considering the widespread use of mobile phones, cellular communication systems wide coverage of the territory of the Russian Federation, the free or low cost of mobile applications for assessing motor activity, convenient interface and high accuracy of measurements of the apps; the usage of the modern technologies while involving underwent myocardial infarction patients into rehabilitation programs could increase the percentage of these programs participants and improve the results obtained during the implementation of the programs.
Research goal. assessment of the impact of the usage of mobile applications, that could monitor the level of motor activity, on the results of a six-minute walk test (6 MWT) among the patients with myocardial infarction who were on the second stage of cardiac rehabilitation.
Materials and methods. Materials and methods: 224 patients were examined: 99 (44.2 %) men and 125 (55.8 %) women aged 60.6 ± 11.5 years, who had had myocardial infarction from 6 days to 6 months ago (median 16 [10; 139] days), which passed the second stage of rehabilitation for 11.6 ± 1.4 days in the conditions of the specialized cardiology department of the Resort-hotel ‘Sosnovka’ (Berdsk, Russia). At the time of admission, in the middle of the rehabilitation course (on the 6th day) and before discharge (on the 12th day), a six-minute walk (6 MWT) test was performed (6 MWT1, 6 MWT2 and 6 MWT3, respectively). Changes in these parameters over time were estimated as the difference between the second and first 6 MWT, the third and first 6 MWT test results, and compared in two groups.
Results obtained. The results of 6 MWT1 performed on admission of patients to the department did not differ between the two groups (F = 3.068; p = 0.81). 6 MWT2, conducted on average one week after the start of the second stage of the cardio-rehabilitation program revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (F = 21.758; p < 0.001), which became more visible when 6 MWT3 was conducted at the end of the second week in the department (F = 66.615; p < 0.001), indicating the advantages of the group using the mobile application.
Conclusion. The active introduction of mobile applications into real clinical practice effectively, non-invasively, does not require additional financial investments from the health care system and personal time of the doctor, being a positive determinant of the preventive behavior of patients.
About the Authors
S. L. PonkinRussian Federation
O. V. Tsygankova
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
E. L. Fyodorova
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
Z. G. Bondareva
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk
References
1. Pedersen F., Butrymovich V., Kelbaek H., Wachtell K., Helqvist S., Kastrup J. et al. Shortand long-term cause of death in patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014, vol. 64, no. 20, pp. 2101–2108.
2. Fokkema M. L., James S. K., Albertsson P., Akerblom A., Calais F., Eriksson P., Jensen J., Nilsson T., de Smet B. J., Sjogren I., Thorvinger B., Lagerqvist B. Population trends in percutaneous coronary intervention: 20-year results from the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry). J Am CollCardiol 2013; 61 (12): 1222–1230.
3. Бондарева З. Г., Федорова Е. А., Кунгурцева О. А., Цыганкова О. В., Руяткин Д. С. Основные факторы риска и особенности клинического течения ишемической болезни сердца у женщин. Сердце: журнал для практикующих врачей. 2017; 16 (2): 110–115.
4. Heran B., Chen J., Ebrahim S., Moxham T., et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014, vol. 7, pp. 1–73.
5. Grifo R., Ambrosetti M., Tramarin R., Fattirolli F., Temporelli P. L., Vestri A. R., De Feo S., Tavazzi L. Effective secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation after coronary revascularization and predictors of poor adherence to lifestyle modification and medication. Results of the ICAROS Survey. Int J Cardiol 2013 Aug 8; 167 (4): 1390–5. Epub 2012 May 8.
6. Kwan G., Balady G. J. Cardiac Rehabilitation 2012. Advancing the Field Through Emerging Science. Circulation 2012; 125: e369–e373.
7. Thomas R., King M., Lui K., Oldridge N., Pina I., Spertus J. AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 Performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services. Circulation 2007; 116: 1611–1642.
8. Montalescot G., Sechtem U., Achenbach S. ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2013, vol. 34, pp. 2949–3003, 2013.
9. Roffi M., Patrono C., Collet J. P., Mueller C., Valgimigli M., Andreotti F., et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016; 37 (3): 267–315.
10. Steg P. G., James S. K., Atar D., Badano L. P., Blomstrom-Lundqvist C., Borger M. A., et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012; 33 (20): 2569–619.
11. Бубнова М. Г., Аронов Д. М. Методические рекомендации. Обеспечение физической активности граждан, имеющих ограничения в состоянии здоровья. Под редакцией Бойцова С. А. КардиоСоматика. 2016; 7 (1): 5–50.
12. Аронов Д. М. Российские клинические рекомендации. Острый инфаркт миокарда с подъемом сегмента ST электрокардиограммы: реабилитация и вторичная профилактика. КардиоСоматика. 2014; 1: 5–42.
13. Бокерия Л. А., Аронов Д. М. Российские клинические рекомендации. Коронарное шунтирование больных ишемической болезнью сердца: реабилитация и вторичная профилактика. КардиоСоматика. 2016; 7 (3–4): 5–71.
14. Kotseva K., Wood D., De Bacquer D., et al. EUROASPIRE IV: A European Society of Cardiology survey on the lifestyle risk factor and therapeutic management of coronary patients from 24 European countries. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2015.
15. Платонов Д. Ю., Костюк Т. А., Брандт А. И., Цыганкова О. В. Детерминанты профилактического поведения в отношении сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний и факторов риска их развития у пациентов с гипертонической болезнью и хронической ишемической болезнью сердца. Рациональная фармакотерапия в кардиологии. 2011; 7 (6): 718–724.
16. Truk-Adawi K.I., Oldridge N. B., Tarima S. S., Stason W. B., Shepard D. S., “Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: what keeps patients in programs?”, J Am Heart Assoc 2013, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. e000418.
17. Mampuya W. M. Cardiac rehabilitation past, present and future: an overview. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012; 2 (1): 38–49.
18. Schopfer D. W., Forman D. E. Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults. Can J Cardiol. 2016 Sep; 32 (9): 1088–96.
19. Haskell W. L., Alderman E. L., Fair J. M., et al. Effects of intensive multiple risk factor reduction on coronary atherosclerosis and clinical cardiac events in men and women with coronary artery disease: the Stanford Coronary Risk Intervention Project (SCRIP). Circulation 1994; 89: 975–90.
20. Kotseva K., Wood D., De B. G., De B. D., Pyorala K., Keil U. EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009; 16 (2): 121–37.
21. Janssen V., De Gucht V., van Exel H., Maes S. Beyond resolutions? A randomized controlled trial of a self-regulation lifestyle programme for post-cardiac rehabilitation patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013; 20 (3): 431–41.
22. ter Hoeve N., Huisstede B. M., Stam H. J., van Domburg R. T., Sunamura M., van den BergEmons R. J. Does cardiac rehabilitation after an acute cardiac syndrome lead to changes in physical activity habits? Systematic review. Phys Ther. 2015; 95 (2): 167–79.
23. Enright P. L., Sherill D. L. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998; 158: 1384–7.
24. Gibbons W. J., Fruchter N., Sloan S., Levy R. D. Reference values for a multiple repetition 6-minute walk test in healthy adults older than 20 years. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001; 21: 87–93.
25. ATS Statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. July 1 2002; 166 (1): 111–7.
26. Inker L. A., et al. KDOQI US commentary on 2012 clinical practice guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014; In press.
27. Levey A., de Jong P.., Coresh J., et al. The definition, classification and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO Controversies Conference Report. Kidney Int. 2011; 80: 17–28.
28. Бурыкин И. М., Алеева Г. Н., Хафизьянова Р. Х. Соответствие фармакотерапии пациентов после инфаркта миокарда принципам доказательной медицины на этапе реабилитации в современных условиях. Вопросы курортологии, физиотерапии и лечебной физической культуры. 2016; 93 (4): 10–19.
29. Taylor R. S., Dalal H., Jolly K., Zawada A., Dean S. G., Cowie A., et al. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 8, CD 007130.
30. Chung H., Ko H., Thap T., Jeong C., Noh S.-E., Yoon K.-H., et al. Smartphone-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program: Feasibility Study. PLoS ONE 2016, 11 (8): e0161268.
31. Skobel E., Knackstedt C., Martinez-Romero A., Salvi D., Vera-Munoz C., Napp A., Luprano J., Bover R., Glöggler S., Bjarnason-Wehrens B., Marx N., Rigby A., Cleland J. Internet-based training of coronary artery patients: the Heart Cycle Trial. Heart Vessels. 2017 Apr; 32 (4): 408–418.
32. Varnfield M., Karunanithi M., Lee C. K., Honeyman E., Arnold D., Ding H., Smith C., Walters D. L. Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2014 Nov; 100 (22): 1770–9.
33. Worringham C., Rojek A., Stewart I. Development and feasibility of a smartphone, ECG and GPS based system for remotely monitoring exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2011 Feb 9; 6 (2): e14669.
34. Fiorina C., Vizzardi E., Lorusso R., Maggio M., De Cicco G., et al. The 6-min walking test early after cardiac surgery. Reference values and the effects of rehabilitation programme. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007 32: 724–729.
35. Mungovan S. F., Singh P., Gass G. C., Smart N. A., Hirschhorn A. D. Effect of physical activity in the first five days after cardiac surgery. J Rehabil Med. 2017 Jan 19; 49 (1): 71–77.
36. Pfaeffli Dale L., Whittaker R., Dixon R., Stewart R., Jiang Y., Carter K., Maddison R. Acceptability of a mobile health exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation intervention: a randomized trial. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2015 Sep-Oct; 35 (5): 12–9.
37. Forman D. E., LaFond K., Panch T., Allsup K., Manning K., Sattelmair J. Utility and efficacy of a smartphone application to enhance the learning and behavior goals of traditional cardiac rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2014 Sep-Oct; 34 (5): 327–34.
38. Neubeck L., Lowres N., Benjamin E. J., Freedman S. B., Coorey G., Redfern J. The mobile revolution — using smartphone apps to prevent cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015 Jun; 12 (6): 350–360.
39. Thorup C., Hansen J., Grønkjær M., Andreasen J. J., Nielsen G., Sørensen E. E., Dinesen B. I. Cardiac Patients’ Walking Activity Determined by a Step Counter in Cardiac Telerehabilitation: Data From the Intervention Arm of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 4; 18 (4): e69.
Review
For citations:
Ponkin S.L., Tsygankova O.V., Fyodorova E.L., Bondareva Z.G. Use of mobile applications assessing motor activity of patients after myocardial infarction for improving indicators of physical rehabilitation. Medical alphabet. 2019;2(21):28-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-2-21(396)-28-33