Cytological analysis of the effectiveness of surgical correction in patients with low crowns of supporting teeth, depending on the level of dental gingival attachment
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-30-76-81
Abstract
Today, the problem of prosthetics for patients with low clinical crowns of supporting teeth is urgent. Even observing all the requirements of dental preparation, the small area of the prepared supporting tooth is not able to fully ensure reliable fixation of the artificial crown and fixed bridge prosthesis. The dentist has to artificially increase the area of contact to ensure better retention using various mechanical and surgical methods. Surgical correction methods are quite traumatic. One of the methods of choice is gum retraction. To assess the intensity of restoration of the dental gingival complex after surgical correction, it is advisable to monitor the stages of healing using additional research methods.
The aim of the work was to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical correction in patients with low crowns of supporting teeth, depending on the level of dental gingival attachment according to cytological research.
Materials and methods. The study involved 110 patients with low crowns of supporting teeth, randomized into 2 groups depending on the level of dental gingival attachment. According to the cytological study, cytograms were analyzed, characterizing a particular type of inflammation/regeneration.
The results were calculated before the start of treatment, on days 3, 7 and 14. The volume fraction of lymphocytes, macrophages, monocytes, and epitheliocytes was studied, and the cell differentiation index was calculated. Positive dynamics was achieved in all comparison groups on the 14th day of follow-up. However, the intensity of the process was different depending on the level of attachment of the dental gingival complex. So, on days 3 and 7, the activity of the inflammatory process prevailed in patients of group I, in the second group there was a statistically significant improvement in all parameters, including the cell differentiation index.
Conclusions. The level of dental gingival attachment should be taken into account when planning orthopedic treatment. When forming a subgingival ledge in compliance with a gentle preparation regimen, it is advisable to carry out the stages of orthopedic treatment after 2 weeks, since there is a risk of infection of periodontal tissues and the addition of a secondary infection.
About the Authors
S. A. VeremeenkoRussian Federation
Sergey Alexandrovich Veremeenko – Assistant Professor of the Department of Propaedeutics of Dental Diseases
Volgograd
Yu. A. Makedonova
Russian Federation
Yulia Alekseevna Makedonova – MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Dentistry, Institute of Continuing Medical and Pharmaceutical Education
Volgograd
V. V. Shkarin
Russian Federation
Vladimir Vyacheslavovich Shkarin – MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Public Health and Public Health at the Institute of Continuing Medical and Pharmaceutical Education
Volgograd
E. N. Yarygina
Russian Federation
Yarygina Elena Nikolaevna – MD, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Surgical Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volgograd
V. S. Gavronskaya
Russian Federation
Veronika Sergeevna Gavronskaya – a student at the Faculty of Dentistry
Simferopol
O. Yu. Afanasyeva
Russian Federation
Afanasyeva Olga Yuryevna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Dentistry, Institute of Continuing Medical and Pharmaceutical Education
Volgograd
A. G. Pavlova-Adamovich
Russian Federation
Anastasia Gennadievna Pavlova-Adamovich – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry, Institute of Continuing Medical and Pharmaceutical Education
Volgograd
References
1. Sadykov M.I. New in orthopedic treatment of patients with the absence of a clinical crown of premolars and anterior teeth / M.I. Sadykov, A.M. Nesterov, V.V. Matrosov // Medical and pharmaceutical journal «Pulse». 2020;22(4):67–73. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/novoe-v-ortopedicheskom-lechenii-patsientov-pri-otsutstvii-klinicheskoy-koronki-premo-lyarov-i-perednih-zubov?ysclid=mctc98dgep128478960.
2. Veremeenko S.A., Makedonova Yu.A., Verstakov D.V., Bolovina Ya.P., Glukhova E.S. Comparative analysis of clinical and functional indices of the gingival margin of patients with low crown height using various methods of preparation for prosthetics / Bulletin of VolGMU. 2023;20(1):50–57. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=53865543&ysclid=mctc9nq672141015898.
3. Yarygina E.N., Poroisky S.V., Makedonova Yu.A., Vorobyov A.A., Dyachenko D.Yu., Gavrikova L.M. Digital methods for diagnosing occlusal disorders. Periodontology. 2024;29(3):259–269. https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2024-974.
4. Nesterov A.M. Modern methods and approaches to the treatment of patients with destroyed clinical crowns of teeth (literature review) / A.M. Nesterov, M.I. Sadykov, V.V. Matrosov // Avicenna. 2020;64:9–16. https://elibrary.ru/item. asp?id=43086205&ysclid=mctca6yt4c583208826.
5. Makedonova Yu.A., Kriventsev A.E., Veremeenko S.A., Dyachenko D.Yu. Justification of a differentiated approach to orthopedic treatment of teeth in systemic pathology. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Medical University. 2020; 3 (75): 79–82. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obosnovanie-differentsirovannogo-podhoda-k-ortopedicheskomu-lecheniyu-zubov-pri-sistemnoy-patologii?ysclid=mctcak2fl6133838393.
6. Khudaleeva K.A., Abolmasov N.N., Serdyukov M.S., Massarsky I.G., Abolmasov I.N., Kovaleva I.A. Microcirculation of the marginal periodontium during the manufacture of artificial crowns with different levels of preparation borders. Periodontology. 2020;25(1):54–58. https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2020-25-1-54-58.
7. Keitsler MI, Slazhneva ES, Ostrovskaya IG, Atrushkevich VG. The role of interactions between microbiota and the epithelial barrier in the pathogenesis of infl ry periodontal diseases: a systematic review. Periodontology. 2024;29(4):366–377. https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2024-1013.
8. Ippolitov YuA, Seredin PV, Goloshchapov DL, Ippolitov IY, Berkovich MV, Folomeeva DM. On the origin of gingival fluid. Periodontology. 2025;30(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3759-2025-1019.
9. Yanushevich O.O., Evarnitskaya N.R., Ermoliev S.N., Aivazova R.A. Study of saliva markers in inflammatory periodontal diseases // Russian Dentistry. 2023. Vol. 16. No. 2. P. 46–50. https://www.mediasphera.ru/issues/rossijskaya-stomatologiya/2023/2/1207264062023021046?ysclid=mctcb25h87401356116.
10. López-Cárdenas MT, Jiménez A, Espinosa-Montesinos A, Maldonado-Alvarado E, Osorio-Peralta MO, Martinez-Escobar A, Moreno-Vázquez A, Aguilera-Arreola MG, Ramón-Gallegos E. Elimination of Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Pathological Microbiota with Photodynamic Therapy in Women from Mexico City with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia I. Photochem Photobiol. 2023 NovDec;99(6):1468–1475. doi: 10.1111/php.13791. Epub 2023 Mar 1. PMID: 36773299.
11. Banchenko G.V., Akopyan O.G., Agadzhanyan A.A., Bykova I.A. Evaluation of the level of differentiation of epithelial cells in impressions from different areas of the oral mucosa of healthy people // Dentistry; 1997;76(1):12–14 http://elib.fesmu.ru/Article.aspx?id=7416.
12. Tokmakova SI, Bondarenko OV, Lunitsyna YuV, Zhukova ES, Mokrenko EV, Gaidarova TA, Yarovaya AO. Study of the effect of dental rinses on the oral microbiota. Pediatric Dentistry and Prevention. 2023;23(1):4–14. DOI: 10.33925/1683-3031-2023-561.
Review
For citations:
Veremeenko S.A., Makedonova Yu.A., Shkarin V.V., Yarygina E.N., Gavronskaya V.S., Afanasyeva O.Yu., Pavlova-Adamovich A.G. Cytological analysis of the effectiveness of surgical correction in patients with low crowns of supporting teeth, depending on the level of dental gingival attachment. Dentistry. 2025;(30):76-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-30-76-81
JATS XML
























