Buy (150 RUB)
|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription or Fee Access
Features of the jaw structure in patients with gnathic distal occlusion
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-1-39-45
Abstract
According to the various studies, the prevalence of malocclusions accompanied by functional and morphological disorders of the dental system ranges from 24.5% to 37.3%. In addition to the functional issues, changes in facial aesthetics negatively affect the psychological state of patients and their social adaptation. Thorough diagnosis is necessary for effective treatment planning of patients with gnathic forms of malocclusion. One of the key diagnostic methods is cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), which allows a detailed assessment of the structure of the facial skull. Without an adequate assessment of the anatomical features of the facial skeleton, including the position and size of the jaws, it is impossible to plan the treatment for such patients. CBCT provides an accurate three-dimensional image, which is especially important for choosing optimal treatment tactics and achieving both functional and aesthetic results.
Materials and Methods. A total of 120 patients with dental occlusion disorders were examined by using cone-beam computed tomography.
Results and Discussion. Cone-beam computed tomography is the most effective technology for performing cephalometric analysis of the skull in patients with various dental anomalies.
About the Authors
P. Sh. Dibirova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Russian University of Medicine» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P.Sh. Dibirova, postgraduate at the Orthodontics Department
Moscow
N. S. Drobysheva
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Russian University of Medicine» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
N.S. Drobysheva, PhD in Medical Sciences, associate professor of the Orthodontics Department
AuthorID: 803799
Moscow
L. A. Klinkova
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Russian University of Medicine» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
L.A. Klinkova, postgraduate at the Department of Radiology
Moscow
References
1. Arípova G., Rasulova, Sh., Nasimov, É., & Dzhumaeva, N. (2022). Prevalence of various forms of distal occlusion in orthodontic patients depending on jaw growth type. Meditsina i Innovatsii [Medicine and Innovations], 1(4), 421–425. (In Russ.)
2. De Ridder L, Aleksieva A, Willems G, Declerck D, Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M. Prevalence of Orthodontic Malocclusions in Healthy Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 17;19(12):7446. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127446. PMID: 35742703; PMCID: PMC9223594. (De Ridder L, Aleksieva A 2022).
3. Jordan AR, Kuhr K, Frenzel Baudisch N, Kirschneck C. Prevalence of malocclusions in 8- and 9-year-old children in Germany-Results of the Sixth
4. German Oral Health Study (DMS 6). J Orofac Orthop. 2023 Jan;84(Suppl 1):19. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00437-z. Epub 2023 Feb 1. PMID: 36723620; PMCID: PMC9892134.
5. Sundareswaran S, Kizhakool P. Prevalence and gender distribution of malocclusion among 13-15-year-old adolescents of Kerala, South India. Indian J Dent Res. 2019;30(3):455-461. doi:10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_801_16
6. Galazov A.T., Red’ko N.A., Drobysheva N.S. & Drobyshev A.Yu. (2023). Correlation between quality of life and severity of skeletal jaw anomalies. Orthodontiya [Orthodontics], 3(103), 61. EDN: TVFVJL. (In Russ.)
7. Galazov A.T., Red’ko N.A., Drobysheva N.S. & Drobyshev A.Yu. (2023). Correlation between quality of life and severity of skeletal jaw anomalies. Orthodontiya [Orthodontics], 3(103), 61. EDN: TVFVJL. (In Russ.)
8. Dibirov T.M., Drobysheva N.S., Sviridov E.G., et al. (2012). Proceedings of the First All-Russian Scientific Conference of Young Medical Scientists of the All-Russian Dental Forum «Innovative Technologies in 21st Century Medicine» (pp. 69–70). (In Russ.)
9. Dibirova P.Sh., Drobysheva N.S. & Mallaeva A.B. (2021). Rationale for the use of computed tomography in diagnosing dentoalveolar anomalies. Orthodontiya [Orthodontics], 3(95), 49–50. EDN: BXIMSH. (In Russ.)
10. Imshenetskaya N.I., Lezhnev D.A., Topol’nitskiy O.Z. & Petrovskaya V.V. (2023). Aspects of choosing computed tomography methods for diagnosing craniofacial dysostoses. Radiologiya – Praktika [Radiology – Practice], 4(100), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2023-4-26-39. (In Russ.)
11. Lezhnev D.A. & Petrovskaya V V. (2019). Modern trends in radiological diagnostics in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery (lecture). Radiologiya – Praktika [Radiology – Practice], 5(77), 57–73. (In Russ.)
12. Hwang S, Jeong S, Choi YJ, Chung CJ, Lee HS, Kim KH. Three-dimensional evaluation of dentofacial transverse widths of adults with various vertical facial patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(5):692–700. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.026.
13. Ma J, Huang J, Jiang JH. Morphological analysis of the alveolar bone of the anterior teeth in severe high-angle skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0210461. Published 2019 Mar 25. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210461
14. Dibirova P.Sh., Vardanyan M.A., Zeinalova-Kutsuri E.M., et al. (2023). Assessment of craniofacial structure features in patients with sagittal occlusal anomalies. Orthodontiya [Orthodontics], 3(103), 64. EDN: OPZDOW. (In Russ.)
15. Drobysheva N.S., Kaminskiy-Dvorzhetskiy N.A., Drobyshev A.Yu., Mallaeva A.B., & Mirzoev M.L. (2019). Patient head positioning for temporomandibular joint evaluation using cone-beam computed tomography. Orthodontiya [Orthodontics], 2(86), 40–41. (In Russ.)
16. Drobysheva N.S., Lezhnev D.A., Petrovskaya V.V., Batova M.A., Perova N.G., Mallaeva A.B., Kaminskiy-Dvorzhetskiy N.A. & Mirzoev M.L. (2019). Application of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Orthodontiya [Orthodontics], 1(85), 32–42. (In Russ.)
17. Zhmyrko I.N., Drobysheva N.S., Slabkovskaya A.B., Klipa I.A. & Drobyshev A.Yu. (2020). Development of an index for assessing the severity of dentoalveolar anomalies. Orthodontiya [Orthodontics], 89(1), 12–20. (In Russ.)
18. Ding W.H., Li W., Chen F., Zhang J.F., Lv Y., Chen X.Y. Comparison of molar intrusion efficiency and bone density by CT in patients with different vertical facial morphology. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:355–362.
19. Wilson B, Konstantoni N, Kim KB, Foley P, Ueno H. Three-dimensional conebeam computed tomography comparison of shorty and standard Class II Carriere Motion appliance. Angle Orthod. 2021 Jul 1;91(4):423-432. doi: 10.2319/041320-295.1. PMID: 33560300; PMCID: PMC8259752.
20. Mallaeva A.B. & Drobysheva N. S. (2020). Alveolar bone structure features in patients with gnathic mesial occlusion. Endodontiya Today, 18(3), 15–25. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Dibirova P.Sh., Drobysheva N.S., Klinkova L.A. Features of the jaw structure in patients with gnathic distal occlusion. Medical alphabet. 2025;(1):39-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-1-39-45
Views:
152
Email this article 