

Reduction of the microbial background in the intensive care unit of a surgical hospital with the systematic introduction of the Alpha‑06A pulsed ultraviolet system into disinfection measures (experimental study)
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-35-90-94
Abstract
Relevance. Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a significant problem in intensive care units. They contribute to increased mortality, lengthen hospital stays and increase treatment-related costs.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of reducing the microbial background and cross-transmission of pathogenic microorganisms associated with the provision of medical care in the intensive care units of surgical hospital with the systemic use of the Alpha‑06A pulsed ultraviolet system with the “Areal” device (Scientific and Production Enterprise «Melitta», Russia).
Materials and methods. The Alfa‑06A air, surface and local areas disinfection system with the “Areal” device was used in the intensive care unit for 2 months – August and September 2024. The “Areal” device directs ultraviolet radiation, generated by the pulsed xenon lamp of the Alfa‑06 installation, into a limited sector. The rest of the room is structurally protected from direct UV radiation. It is allowed to use it in the presence of patients and staff. The use of the installation complemented the standard anti-epidemic measures. At the end of the study period, the results of microbiological studies were retrospectively evaluated and compared with the results of the control period.
Results. A statistically significant (Fisher’s criterion 0.00383, p<0.05) tenfold decrease in the number of positive samples from surfaces during the treatment period in the «Areal» mode was noted. A decrease in bacterial pollution of the environment led to a distinct tendency to reduce cases of contamination of patients with various bacterial flora, and the acquisition by the patients of multidrug-resistant organisms statistically significantly decreased by 100 % (p<0.5). As a result, the use of the Alpha system in the «Areal» mode reduced the cost of expensive antibacterial drugs by 18.9 % in absolute and 7.4 % in relative terms.
Conclusion. The systematic use of Alfa‑06A in conjunction with the “Areal” device in the daily work of the intensive care unit significantly reduces the contamination of surfaces with microorganisms. This is reflected in a decrease in the number of positive samples from various patient loci. The number of cases of persistence of polyresistant problematic bacteria of the ESKAPE group is also decreasing. The improvement of the microbiological background shows a clear economic effect in terms of the cost of expensive antibacterial drugs.
About the Authors
O. V. StruninRussian Federation
Strunin Oleg V., DM Sci (habil.), head of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Dept with Resuscitation and Intensive Care Units
Moscow
R. P. Terekhova
Russian Federation
Terekhova Raisa P., PhD Med, head of Laboratory for Prevention and Treatment of Bacterial Infections
Moscow
A. V. Kozlova
Russian Federation
Kozlova Alevtina V., DM Sci (habil.), deputy chief physician for Sanitary and Epidemiological Work
Moscow
V. S. Demidova
Russian Federation
Demidova Valentina S., Dr Bio Sci, head of Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory
Moscow
References
1. Sheng W., Wang J. T., Lu D. C., Chie W. C., Chen Y. C., Chang S. C. Comparative impact of hospital-acquired infections on medical costs, length of hospital stay and outcome between community hospitals and medical centres. Journal of Hospital Infection 2005; 59, 205–214. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.06.003
2. Wang J., Liu F., Tartari E., Huang J., Harbarth S., Pittet D., Zingg W. The prevalence of healthcare-associated infections in mainland China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2018;39, 701–709. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2018.60
3. David J. Weber 1, Anderson D., William A. Rutala The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infections. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 2013;26, 338–344. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283630f04
4. Harbarth S., Sax H., Gastmeier P. The preventable proportion of nosocomial infections: an overview of published reports. Journal of Hospital Infection 2003;54, 258–266. PMID: 12919755 DOI: 10.1016/s0195–6701 (03) 00150-6
5. Skopin A. Yu., Mukabenov F. A., Matveeva E. A. Improving the system of disinfectological prevention of infectious diseases using new equipment for aerosol disinfection. Disinfection business. 2020; 3:25–26. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35411/2076–457X-2020-3-22-28
6. Alexandre R. Marra, Marin L. Schweizer, Michael B. Edmond No-touch disinfection methods to decrease multidrug-resistant organism infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 2018;39, 20–31. PMID: 29144223 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2017.226
7. Shashkovsky S. G., Kalinchuk T. A., Polikarpov N. A., Goldstein Ya.A., Goncharenko I. V. Equipment for disinfection of premises in healthcare facilities based on pulsed ultraviolet technology, Journal «Polyclinic» No. 3, 2009 (In Russ.).
8. Ushakov I., Novikova N., Shashkovsky S. Sterilizing light. Science in Russia, 2011, No. 6 (186), pp. 11–16. (In Russ.).
9. Arkhipov V. P., Kamrukov A. S., Kozlov N. P., Shashkovsky S. G., Yalovik M. S. Plasma-optical technologies for disinfection and neutralization of environmental objects. Bulletin of Bauman Moscow State Technical University. Series «Mechanical Engineering». 2011. – P. 120–134. (In Russ.).
10. Goldstein Ya.A., Golubtsov A. A., Kireev S. G., Shashkovsky S. G. New generation of pulsed UV installations of the «Alpha» series for prompt disinfection of air and surfaces of premises, journal «Medical Almanac», No. 3 (60), September 2019 (In Russ.).
11. Shestopalov N. V., Akimkin V. G., Goldstein Ya.A., Golubtsov A. A., Kireev S. G., Polikarpov N. A., Shashkovsky S. G. OOO NPP Melita, Study of the bactericidal efficiency of air and open surface disinfection with continuous spectrum pulsed ultraviolet radiation, Scientific and practical peer-reviewed journal Epidemiology and Hygiene, Medical Alphabet series, No. 18 (315), 2017 (In Russ.).
12. Akimkin V. G. Pulse ultraviolet units for simultaneous disinfection of air and surfaces, Chief Nurse Magazine No. 5, May, 2016 (In Russ.).
13. Dong Z., Zhou N., Liu G., Zhao L. Role of pulsed-xenon ultraviolet light in reducing healthcareassociated infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology and Infection 2020;148; e165, 1–10. Doi.org/10.1017/S 095026882000148X
14. Kitagawa H., Mori M., Kawano R., Hara T., Kashiyama S., Hayashi Y., Sasabe Y., Ukon K., Shimokawa N., Nomura T., Omori K., Shigemoto N., Shime N., Ohge H. Combining pulsed xenon ultraviolet disinfection with terminal manual cleaning helps reduce the acquisition rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. American Journal of Infection Control; 2021; V.49, Issue 8, August, P. 1048–1051/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.01.019
15. Kitagawa H., Mori M., Hara T., Kashiyama S., Shigemoto N., Ohge H. Effectiveness of pulsed xenon ultraviolet disinfection for Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile surface contamination in a Japanese hospital. American Journal of Infection Control; 2021; Jan;49(1): 55–58. PMID: 32485271 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.032
Review
For citations:
Strunin O.V., Terekhova R.P., Kozlova A.V., Demidova V.S. Reduction of the microbial background in the intensive care unit of a surgical hospital with the systematic introduction of the Alpha‑06A pulsed ultraviolet system into disinfection measures (experimental study). Medical alphabet. 2024;(35):90-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-35-90-94