Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

ECMO against the background of endovascular intervention in a patient with acute coronary syndrome in conditions of resuscitation measures

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-35-43-49

Abstract

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may be a critically important method for supporting patients with acute STsegment elevation coronary syndrome (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high-risk settings.
Objective: to demonstrate the effectiveness of ECMO in a patient with severe cardiovascular insufficiency against the background of myocardial
ischemia in conditions of ongoing intensive care
Clinical observations: a case of the use of VA-ECMO before PCI in a 63-year-old patient with multiple occlusive stenotic lesions of the coronary bed is described. Due to the high risk of complications during planned PCI and ongoing CPR, it was decided to start VA-ECMO to provide mechanical circulatory support. Balloon angioplasty was performed with stenting of the LCA trunk and permanent residence with 2 stents in conditions of extracorporeal life support. After stenting, an effective sinus rhythm was independently restored. On the 4th day, decannulation and excommunication from ECMO were performed. On the 7th day, the patient was transferred from the ICU to the cardiology department. The patient was discharged on the 18th day.
Conclusion: the use of ECMO contributed to the stabilization of the patient’s vital signs in conditions of acute myocardial ischemia and made it possible to perform effective recanalization against the background of resuscitation measures.

About the Authors

D. A. Saenko
Moscow city clinical hospital named after V. M. Buyanov, Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Saenko Denis A., anesthesiologist-resuscitator of the highest category at Dept of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation

Moscow



A. V. Salikov
Moscow city clinical hospital named after V. M. Buyanov, Moscow Department of Health; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov Medical University)
Russian Federation

Salikov Aleksandr V., PhD Med, associate professor at Dept of General Surgery;

chief physician

Moscow



V. S. Suryakhin
Moscow city clinical hospital named after V. M. Buyanov, Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Suryakhin Viktor S., PhD Med, head of Resuscitation and Intensive Care Service

Moscow



D. D. Ustinov
Moscow city clinical hospital named after V. M. Buyanov, Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Ustinov Djulustaan D., anesthesiologist-resuscitator at Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Dept

Moscow



R. A. Cherpakov
Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology; N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine
Russian Federation

Cherpakov Rostislav A., PhD Med, senior researcher at Organ Protection Laboratory in Critical Conditions;

junior researcher at General Resuscitation Dept Federa

Moscow



I. Yu. Sholin
Moscow city clinical hospital named after V. M. Buyanov, Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Sholin Ivan Yu., PhD Med, head of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation Dept

Moscow



Yu. V. Gavrilov
Moscow city clinical hospital named after V. M. Buyanov, Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Gavrilov Yuri V., PhD Med, head of Resuscitation and Iintensive Care Dept No. 1

Moscow



A. V. Orlov
Moscow city clinical hospital named after V. M. Buyanov, Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Orlov Andrey V., physician anesthesiologist-resuscitator of the highest category at Depat of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation

Moscow



References

1. Открытые данные Росстата; URL https://rosstat.gov.ru/ Open data of Rosstat; URL https://rosstat.gov.ru/

2. Erlich A. D., Matskeplishvili S. T., Graziansky N. A., Buziashvili Yu.I. and others. The First Moscow Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome: characteristics of patients, treatment and outcomes during hospital stay. Cardiology. 2013; 12: 4–14

3. Open data of the Russian Society of ECMO Specialists; URL https://экмо.рф

4. Takayama H, Truby L, Koekort M, et al. Clinical outcome of mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock in the current era. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013; 32: 106–111.

5. Loskutov A. et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with coronary heart disease. The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology. 2020; 52 (3): 196–202.

6. Averkov O. V. et al. Acute myocardial infarction with elevation of the ST segment of the electrocardiogram. Clinical guidelines 2020. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020; 11: 251–310

7. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation; URL http://www.euroscore.org/calc.html

8. Tang E. W., Wong C. K., Herbison P. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post acute coronary syndrome. American heart journal. 2007; 153(1): 29–35.

9. Rihal C. S. et al. 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS clinical expert consensus statement on the use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in cardiovascular care: endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d’intervention. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2015; 65 (19): e7-e26.

10. Ryabov V. V. et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the treatment of cardiogenic shock in case of lightning myocarditis. Cardiology. 2019; 59 (6): 81–85

11. Brscic E. et al. In-Hospital and Mid-Term Outcomes of ECMO Support During Coronary, Structural, or Combined Percutaneous Cardiac Intervention in High-Risk Patients–A Single-Center Experience. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine. 2021; 32: 63–67.

12. Radsel P. et al. Emergency veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO)-supported percutaneous interventions in refractory cardiac arrest and profound cardiogenic shock. Resuscitation. 2021; 160: 150–157.


Review

For citations:


Saenko D.A., Salikov A.V., Suryakhin V.S., Ustinov D.D., Cherpakov R.A., Sholin I.Yu., Gavrilov Yu.V., Orlov A.V. ECMO against the background of endovascular intervention in a patient with acute coronary syndrome in conditions of resuscitation measures. Medical alphabet. 2024;(35):43-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-35-43-49

Views: 167


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)