

Clinical significance of procollagen type III N-terminal peptide in patients with alcoholic liver disease
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-5-32-35
Abstract
Background. Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) – is a disease that leads to the development of liver cirrhosis (LC) with a high mortality rate. N-terminal type lll procollagen peptide (PIIINP) is one of the optimal biomarkers for assessing fibrogenesis.
Objective: to determine the clinical significance of PIIINP blood level in patients with ALD.
Materials and methods. 97 patients with ALD were examined. The age of the patients was 48,5±9,9 years, there were 30 women, 67 men. Steatosis was diagnosed in 12 patients, 11 – alcoholic hepatitis (AH), 74 – LC. In group with LC, 16 patients was diagnosed AH against confirmed cirrhosis. PIIINP blood level determined by ELISA. Control group consisted of 22 healthy volunteers who have not consumed alcohol in hepatotoxic doses.
Results. In all patients, PIIINP blood level was increased. In steatosis PIIINP slightly increased the norm, indicating the beginning of fibrogenesis. In LC, PIIINP blood level was higher than in patients with steatosis, which reflected increasing of fibrosis and progression of the disease. The highest levels of PIIINP were observed in cases with AH. Levels PIIINP in patients with AH but without LC and in patients with AH against the background of the formed LC did not differ. In Maddray index of more than 32 (9 patients), the PIIINP level was higher than in 18 patients with index values <32, which confirmed the role of AH in development of fibrosis and decompensation of liver function.
Conclusion. Determination of PIIINP blood level in patients with ALD will allow predict the activity of fibrogenesis and the severity of subsequent changes in liver tissue. In cases of severe AH, PIIINP may be an additional criterion determining the severity and prognosis of hepatitis outcomes.
About the Authors
N. I. GeyvandovaRussian Federation
Geyvandova Natalya I. - DM Sci (habil.), professor of Dept of Hospital Therapy.
Stavropol
G. K. Bolbat
Russian Federation
Bolbat Geogiy K. - applicant of Dept of Hospital Therapy Stavropol SMU, head of Organizational and Methodological Dept City polyclinic No. 3.
Stavropol
A. V. Yagoda
Russian Federation
Yagoda Alexander V. - DM Sci (habil.), professor, head of Dept of Hospital Therapy.
Stavropol
References
1. Hirode G., Saab S., Wong R. J. Trends in the burden of chronic liver disease among hospitalized US adults. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(4): e201997. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1997
2. Julien J., Ayer T., Tapper EB, et al. Effect of increased alcohol consumption during COVID-19 pandemic on alcohol-associated liver disease: A modeling study. Hepatology 2022; 75(6): 1480–90. DOI: 10.1002/hep.32272
3. Pollard MS, Tucker JS, Green HD Jr. Changes in adult alcohol use and consequences during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3(9): e2022942. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22942
4. Jophlin L. L., Singal A.K, Bataller R., et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;1;119(1):30–54. DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002572
5. Lackner C., Spindelboeck W., Haybaeck J., et al. Histological parameters and alcohol abstinence determine long-term prognosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease. J Hepatol. 2017; 66: 610–618. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.11.011
6. Angulo P., Kleiner D.E, Dam-Larsen S., et al. Liver fibrosis, but no other histologic features, is associated with long-term outcomes of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149: 389–397.e10. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.043
7. Ekstedt M., Hagström H., Nasr P., et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology 2015;61(5):1547–54. DOI: 10.1002/hep.27368
8. Lombardi R., Buzzetti E., Roccarina D., Tsochatzis E. A. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease // World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21; 21(39): 11044–11052. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i39.11044
9. Chrostek L, Panasiuk A. Liver fibrosis markers in alcoholic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:8018–8023. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8018
10. Karsdal M. A., Daniels S. J., Nielsen S. H., et al. Collagen biology and non-invasive biomarkers of liver fi brosis. Liver International. 2020;40:736–750. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14390
11. Tsuchida T., Friedman S. L. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(7):397. 411. DOI:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.38
12. Hikichi T., Obara K., Nakamura S., et al. Potential application of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography for the treatment of esophageal and gastric varices. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(Suppl 1):17–22. DOI: 10.1111/den.12436
13. Carrion J. A., Fernandez-Varo G., Bruguera.M, et al. Serum fibrosis markers identify patients with mild and progressive hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(1):147–158 e141. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.047
14. Martínez S. M., Crespo G., Navasa M., Forns X. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2011;53:325–335. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.042
15. Thiele M., Madsen B. S., Hansen J. F., et al. Accuracy of the enhanced liver fibrosis test vs fibrotest, elastography, and indirect markers in detection of advanced fibrosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:1369–1379. DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.005
16. Majumdar A., Campos S., Gurusamy K., et al. Defining the minimum acceptable diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive fibrosis testing in cirrhosis: a decision analytic modeling study. Hepatology. 2019. https://DOI.org/10.1002/hep.30846
17. Nielsen M. J., Veidal S. S., Karsdal MA, et al. Plasma Pro-C 3 (N-terminal type III collagen propeptide) predicts fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Liver Int. 2015; 35(2): 429–437. DOI:10.1111/liv.12700
18. Daniels S.J, Leeming D. J., Eslam M., et al. ADAPT: an algorithm incorporating PRO-C 3 accurately identifies patients with NAFLD and advanced fibrosis. Hepatology. 2019; 69: 1075–1086. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30163
19. Badid C., Vincent M., Mcgregor B., et al. Mycophenolate mofetil reduces myofibroblast infiltration and collagen III deposition in rat remnant kidney. Kidney Int. 2000; 58: 51–61. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523–1755.2000.00140.x
20. Leeming D. J., Dolman G., Nielsen M. J., et al. True collagen type III formation (Pro-C 3) is predictive of outcome in HCV patients with advanced liver fibrosis with in the trent study. J Hepatol. 2016; 64: S 719-S 720. DOI:10.1016/S0168–8278(16)01390–8
21. Leeming D.J, Veidal S. S., Karsdal M. A., et al. Pro-C 5, a marker of true type V collagen formation and fibrillation, correlates with portal hypertension in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015; 50: 584–592. DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2014.996590
22. Exposito J. Y., Valcourt U., Cluzel C., Lethias C. The fibrillar collagen family. Int J Mol Sci. 2010; 11: 407–426. DOI: 10.3390/ijms11020407
23. Gomes R. N., Manuel F., Nascimento D. S. The bright side of fibroblasts: Molecular signature and regenerative cues in major organs. NPJ Regen. Med. 2021;6(1): 43. DOI: 10.1038/s41536–021–00153-z
24. Rockey, D.C.; Friedman, S. L. Fibrosis Regression After Eradication of Hepatitis C Virus: From Bench to Bedside. Gastroenterology. 2021;160: 1502–1520. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.09.065
25. Tsochatzis E., Bruno S., Isgro G., et al. Collagen proportionate area is superior to other histological methods for sub-classifying cirrhosis and determining prognosis. J Hepatol. 2014; 60: 948–954. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.12.023
26. Thiele M., Johansen S., Gudmann N. S., et al. Progressive alcoholrelated liver fibrosis is characterised by imbalanced collagen formation and degradation. Alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics. 2021; 54 (8):1070–1080. DOI:10.1111/apt.16567
27. Ivanov A.S ., Tarasenko E. V., Garmasch I. V., et al. Markers of endothelial dysfunction, cytokine status, collagen COL1A1_1 gene on the development of liver fibrosis in in alcohol abusers. Patologicheskaya Fiziologiya i Eksperimental`naya terapiya. (Pathological Physiology and Experimental Therapy, Russian Journal). 2019; 63(3): 55–63. (in Russian). DOI: 10.25557/0031–2991.2019.03.55–63
28. Ivashkin V. T., Mayevskaya M. V., Pavlov Ch.S., et al. Management of adult patients with alcoholic liver disease: clinical guidelines of the Russian Scientific Liver Society. Ross z gastroenterol gepatol koloproktol 2017;27(6): 20–40. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382–4376–2017–27–6–20–40
29. Crabb D. W., Im G. Y., Szabo G. et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcohol-Associated Liver Diseases: 2019 Practice Guidance From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases Hepatology 71(1): p 306–333, January 2020. DOI: 10.1002/hep.30866
30. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of alcohol-related liver disease J. of Hepatol. 2018 vol. 69 j 154–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.018
31. Dudanova O. P., Rodina A. S., Shubina M. E., et al. Collagens of the third and fourth types in various forms of alcoholic liver disease. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2022;(11):128–134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682–8658-ecg-207–11–128–134
Review
For citations:
Geyvandova N.I., Bolbat G.K., Yagoda A.V. Clinical significance of procollagen type III N-terminal peptide in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Medical alphabet. 2024;(5):32-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-5-32-35