Biofeedback method influence on motor function restoration in early rehabilitation period of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke patients
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2022-32-31-35
Abstract
Study of motor function restoration in patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke during early rehabilitation period is presented. The first group (n = 92) consisted of patients who received standard rehabilitation treatment with biofeedback trainings of electromyographic modality. The second group (n = 100) of patients received standard rehabilitation treatment. There were no significant differences between the compared groups by gender, age, stroke risk factors and severity of the condition at the rehabilitation treatment start. Biofeedback trainings significantly improved kynesiophobia and increased the proportion of patients with a mild degree of addiction in daily living.
About the Authors
N. M. Tertyshnaya
North-Western State Medical University n. a. I. I. Mechnikov; Medical rehabilitation centre ‘Health – XXI century’
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tertyshnaya Natalia M., postgraduate student of Dept of Neurology n. a. acad. S. N. Davidenkov; neurologist
Saint Petersburg
Taganrog
V. V. Goldobin
North-Western State Medical University n. a. I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Goldobin Vitaliy V., DM Sci (habil.), head of Dept of Neurology n. a. acad. S. N. Davidenkov
Saint Petersburg
E. G. Klocheva
North-Western State Medical University n. a. I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Klocheva Elena G., DM Sci (habil.), professor at Dept of Neurology n. a. acad. S. N. Davidenkov
Saint Petersburg
A. A. Zuyev
North-Western State Medical University n. a. I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zuev Andrey A., PhD Med, associate professor at Dept of Neurology n. a. acad. S. N. Davidenkov
Saint Petersburg
I. V. Chistova
North-Western State Medical University n. a. I. I. Mechnikov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Chistova Inga V., assistant at Dept of Neurology n. a. acad. S. N. Davidenkov
Saint Petersburg
References
1. Gusev E.I., Martynov M. Yu., Kamchatnov P.R., Yasamanova A.N., Shchukin I.A., Kolesnikova T.I. Cerebral stroke. Reference book of the polyclinic doctor. 2015; No. 1, 44–45.
2. Piradov M.A., Aleksandrovich M.Y., Tanashyan M.M. Stroke a step-by-step Gidlines for doctors. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. Ser. Library of a specialist doctor: Neurology, resuscitation, neurosurgery. 2020. 288. https://doi.org/10.33029/9704–5782–5-STR2–2020–1–288.
3. Klochikhina OA, Stakhovskaya LV, Polunina EA, Strakhov OA, Klochihina MM. Epidemiology and prognosis of the level of morbidity and mortality from stroke in different age groups according to the territorial-population register. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry n.a. S.S. Korsakov. 2019; 119 (8–2): 5–12. https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20191190825
4. Levin O.S., Bogolepova A.N. Poststroke motor and cognitive impairments: clinical features and current approaches to rehabilitation. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry n.a. S.S. Korsakov. 2020; 120 (11): 99–107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202012011199
5. Levin O.S. Poststroke motor impairments. Present therapy in psychiatry and neurology. 2016. No. 3. P. 25–32.
6. Stinear C.M., Lang C.E., Zeiler S., Byblow W.D. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Apr; 19 (4): 348–360. DOI: 10.1016/S1474–4422(19)30415–6. Epub 2020 Jan 28. PMID: 32004440.
7. Fluet GG, Patel J, Qiu Q, Yarossi M, Massood S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E, Merians AS. Motor skill changes and neurophysiologic adaptation to recovery-oriented virtual rehabilitation of hand function in a person with subacute stroke: A case study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jul; 39 (15): 1524–1531. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1226421. Epub 2016 Sep 27. PMID: 27669997; PMCID: PMC5368038.
8. Barantsevich ER, Kovalchuk VV, Ovchinnikov DA, Sturova Yu V. Modern aspects of organization of rehabilitation in stroke patients. Arterial Hypertension. 2015; 21 (2): 206–217.
9. V.V. Kovalchuk. Patients after stroke: Peculiarities of care and rehabilitation. Siberian Medical Review, 201; (1): 99–106. DOI: 10.20333/2500136–2017–1–99–106.
10. Ekusheva E.V. Modern technologies and prospects of rehabilitation of patients after ischemic stroke. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry n.a. S.S. Korsakov. 2017. (117). No. 12. P. 147–155.
11. Shklovsky V. M.., Lukashevich I.P, Gerasimova S. M., Selishchev G. S., Remennik A. Yu, Prognostic criteria of rehabilitation of patients with ischemic stroke. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2015, No. 5.
12. Kovalchuk V.V., Barantsevich E.R., Galkin A.S., Guryanova E.A., Nesterin K.V. Multidisciplinary principle of management in stroke patients. Criterions of efficiency and factors of successful rehabilitation. Medical Alphabet. 2020; (22): 15–21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078–5631–2020–22–15–21
13. A.I. Fedin, I.A. Solopova, D. Yu. Tikhonova, A.A. Grishin Medical technology in neurorehabilitation of patients with movement disorders in acute stroke. Bulletin of RSMU. 2012, No. 1, 47–52.
14. Kotov S. V., Egorova Yu.V., Isakova E. V. Efficiency of a comprehensive program with biological feedback on support reaction in the restoring period of stroke. Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry n.a. S.S. Korsakov. 2021; 121 (12–2): 20–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro202112112220
15. E.N. Zharova, E.A. Vershinina, A.B. Bondarenko et al. Rehabilitation of patients after stroke using biofeedback and a multidisciplinary approach. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University. Medicine. 2022. Vol. 17. No. 2. P. 70–87. https://DOI 10.21638/spbu11.2022.201
16. Shapovalenko T. V., Sidyakina I. V., Lyadov K. V., Ivanov V. V. Prospects for the use of innovative BFB (biofeedback) technologies in the rehabilitation of patients after a stroke. Bulletin of Restorative Medicine. 2011. No. 3 (43). Pp. 2–5.
17. Parfenov V. A. Management of patients after ischemic stroke. Russian Neurological Journal. 2020; 25 (5): 51–57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30629/2658–7947–2020–25–5–51–57
18. Suponeva N.A., Yusupova D.G., Zhirova E.S., Melchenko D.A., Taratukhina A.S., Butkovskaya А.A., Ilyina K.A., Zaitsev A.B., Zimin A.A., Klochkov A.S., Lyukmanov R.K., Kalinkina M.E., Piradov M.А., Kotov-Smolensky A.M., Khizhnikova A.E. Validation of the modified Rankin Scale in Russia. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2018; 10 (4): 36–39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14412/2074–2711–2018–4–36–39
19. Fazekas F., Chawluk J.B., Alavi A et al. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzeimer’s dementia and normal aging. American Journal of Roentgenology. 1987. No. 149 (2). P. 351–356.
Review
For citations:
Tertyshnaya N.M., Goldobin V.V., Klocheva E.G., Zuyev A.A., Chistova I.V. Biofeedback method influence on motor function restoration in early rehabilitation period of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke patients. Medical alphabet. 2022;1(32):31-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2022-32-31-35
Views:
397
Email this article 