The use of CBCT to asses buccal bone thickness overlying mandibular anterior teeth
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-35-32-35
Abstract
Objectives: the aim of this study was to determine the relationship between gingival width with respect to the underlying bone thickness in mandibular anterior sextant.
Material and metods: 40 CBCT were included. Buccal bone thickness was measured at 3, 4.5, 6, 8 mm apical to the cement–enamel junction (CEJ). In addition, the apicoincisal gingival width was measured.
Results: at 3 mm from the cement-enamel junction, the buccal bone plate was in 69.4% of cases, the average thickness of buccal bone plate for all teeth was less than 1.0 mm, at the level of 4.5 and 6 mm in 30,6% of cases “Absence” of the external cortical plate, the thickness of which gradually increased in the apical direction (8 mm). When the efficiency is less than 2 mm, the effect of the absence of the external cortical plate according to CBCT data was more often observed.
Conclusion: in this study revealed the relationship between the gingival width and the anatomical features of the buccal bone plate.
About the Author
N. V. BovanovaRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Макеева И.М., Бякова С.Ф., Аджиева Э.К., Голубева Г.И., Грачев В.И., Касаткина И.В. Диагностика вертикальных трещин корней зубов с помощью конусно-лучевой компьютерной томографии. Стоматология. 2016;95(6):9-11. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20169569-11
2. Наумович C.C., Наумович С.А. Конусно-лучевая компьютерная томография: современные возможности и перспективы применения в стоматологии. Современная стоматология. 2012; 2:31-36.
3. Cook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, et al. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: An in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011;31:345–354.
4. Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, et al. The thickness of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol. 2012;83:187–197.
5. Khoury, Joe DDS, MScD; Ghosn, Nabil DDS, MScD; Mokbel, Nadim DDS, MSc, PhD; Naaman, Nada DDS, DUSC, PhD Buccal Bone Thickness Overlying Maxillary Anterior Teeth, Implant Dentistry: August 2016 - Volume 25 - Issue 4 - p 525-531 doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000427
6. Han JY, Jung GU. Labial and lingual/palatal bone thickness of maxillary and mandibular anteriors in human cadavers in Koreans. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2011;41:60–66.
7. La Rocca AP, Alemany AS, Levi P Jr, et al. Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: Relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness. Implant Dent. 2012;21:507–515.
8. Lee SL, Kim HJ, Son MK, et al. Anthropometric analysis of maxillary anterior buccal bone of Korean adults using cone-beam CT. J Adv Prosthodont. 2010;2:92–96.
9. Nimigean VR, Nimigean V, Bencze MA, et al. Alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations: An anatomical study and review. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2009;50:391–397.
10. Peterson AG, Wang M, Gonzalez S, Covell DA, Jr, Katancik J, Sehgal HS. An in vivo and cone beam computed tomography investigation of the accuracy in measuring alveolar bone height and detecting dehiscence and fenestration defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33: 1296–1304.
11. Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Variation in voxel value distribution and effect of time between exposures in six CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2014; 43: 20130376. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130376
12. Swasty D, Lee JS, Huang JC, et al. Anthropometric analysis of the human mandibular cortical bone as assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:491–500.
13. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 40: 265–73. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039
14. Zekry A, Wang R, Chau AC, et al. Facial alveolar bone wall width: A cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:194–206.
Review
For citations:
Bovanova N.V. The use of CBCT to asses buccal bone thickness overlying mandibular anterior teeth. Medical alphabet. 2020;(35):32-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-35-32-35