Comparison of modern quantitative methods for determining level of D-dimer based on immunoturbidimetry
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-3-22(397)-56-57
Abstract
The object of this paper is the comparative analysis of the results of determination of the D-dimer level with the new home-produced reagent on the basis of original monoclonal antibodies with the results of the widespread diagnostic analogues. The research study included blood samples of 80 patients. 22 of these patients (27.5 %) were diagnosed venous thrombosises of the lower limbs, 28 patients (35.0 %) did not have any thrombotic complications (control group). Besides, the research included 30 pregnant women (37.5 %) with different duration of gestation. Despite some distinctions when determining the D-dimer level, contemporary quantitative methods of the D-dimer level study demonstrate comparability of the research results which is documented by the high rates of correlation. The new diagnostic kit Tech-D-dimer-auto, based on the use of original monoclonal antibodies, demonstrates good comparability with analogues and is suitable for detection of thrombosis.
About the Authors
A. N. MamaevRussian Federation
M. V. Pykhteeva
Russian Federation
S. S. Terekhov
Russian Federation
A. V. Kudinov
Russian Federation
D. A. Trukhina
Russian Federation
E. V. Grigoryeva
Russian Federation
N. N. Yasafova
Russian Federation
References
1. Thomas R. H. Hypercoagulability syndromes // Arch. Intern. Med. — 2001. — 12. — P. 2433–2439.
2. Бокарев И. Н. Попова Л. В. Современные проблемы тромбозов артерий и вен // Практическая медицина. — 2014. — Т. 82, № : 6. — С.13–17.
3. Мамаев А. Н. Практическая гемостазиология: (руководство для врачей) // М.: Практическая медицина, 2014. — С. 240.
4. Момот А. П. Патология гемостаза. Принципы и алгоритмы клинико-лабораторной диагностики. — СПб.: ФормаТ, 2006. — С. 208.
5. Causes of elevated D-dimer in patients admitted to a large urban emergency department. Lippi G., Bonfanti L., Saccenti C., Cervellin G..// Eur. J. Intern. Med. — 2014. — 25. — Р. 45–48.
6. Magnitude of D-dimer matters for diagnosing pulmonary embolus. Shah K., Quaas J., Rolston D. et al. // Am J. Emerg. Med. — 2013. — 31. — Р. 942–945.
7. Levi M. Diagnosis and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation// Int. J. Lab. Hematol. — 2014. — 36. — Р. 228–236.
8. Преаналитический этап исследования системы гемостаза. Мамаев А. Н., Гильманов А. Ж., Вавилова Т. В., Момот А. П. // Клиническая лабораторная диагностика. — 2011. — N 4. — С. 35–38.
Review
For citations:
Mamaev A.N., Pykhteeva M.V., Terekhov S.S., Kudinov A.V., Trukhina D.A., Grigoryeva E.V., Yasafova N.N. Comparison of modern quantitative methods for determining level of D-dimer based on immunoturbidimetry. Medical alphabet. 2019;3(22):56-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-3-22(397)-56-57