Modern methods of assessing function and strength ofpelvic muscles in women
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-1-1(376)-80-85
Abstract
Objective: to provide an overview of modern methods for assessing the function and strength of the pelvic floor muscles in women available for clinical practice. The main provisions. Foreign and domestic sources found in free access Internet databases were analyzed. Visual observation, palpation, perineometry, electromyography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging measure various aspects of the function and strength of the pelvic floor muscles. Perineometry allows you to accurately measure the force of contractions of the pelvic floor muscles and is an easy and affordable way. Oxford vaginal palpation technologies, biofeedback devices, and ultrasound can be important clinical tools in the practice of a physician to quantify dysfunction of the pelvic floor. Conclusion. The obtained data on methods for assessing the function and strength of the pelvic floor muscles indicate the need for perineometry in clinical practice for the timely diagnosis of pelvic floor insufficiency, which will allow choosing the right rehabilitation method for women of different age groups.
About the Authors
G. B. Dikke
Academy of Medical Education n.a. F. I. Inozemtsev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu. G. Kucheryavaya
Academy of Medical Education n.a. F. I. Inozemtsev
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Sukhanov
Tyumen State Medical University; Perinatal Centre, Tyumen; Perinatal Centre, Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
I. I. Kukarskaya
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. Yu. Scherbatykh
"Smart Medicine" Medical centre; Pentcroft Pharma
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Кочев Д. М., Дикке Г. Б. Дисфункция тазового дна до и после родов и превентивные стратегии в акушерской практике. Акушерство и гинекология. 2017; 5: 9-15. DOI: org/10.18565/aig.2017.5.9-15.
2. Нехирургический дизайн промежности / под ред. В. Е. Радзинского. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2017. 252 с.
3. Беженарь В. Ф., Богатырева Е. В., Павлова Н. Г. и др.; ред. Э. К. Айламазян. Пролапс тазовых органов у женщин: этиология, патогенез, принципы диагностики: пособие для врачей. СПб.: Изд-во Н-Л; 2010. 48 с.
4. B0 K., Sherburn M. Evaluation of female pelvic-floor muscle function and strength. Physical Therapy. 2005; 85 (3):269-82. DOI: 10.1093/ ptj/85.3.269.
5. Kegel A. H. Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1948; 56:238-249.
6. Макрушина Н. В., Фастыковская Е.Д. Ультразвуковая диагностика недостаточности мышц тазового дна у женщин. Сибирский медицинский журнал, 2012; 3 (27): 91-96.
7. Чечнева М. А., Буянова С. Н., Щукина Н. А., Лысенко С. Н., Барто Р. А. Ультразвуковая диагностика пролапса гениталий и его осложнений у женщин. SonoAce Ultrasound. Эхография в гинекологии. 2012; 23: 25-33.
8. Voll0yhaug.I, M0rkved S., Salvesen Ø., Salvesen K Å. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction with palpation, perineometry and transperineal ultrasound: a cross-sectional study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47 (6): 768-73. DOI: 10.1002/uog.15731.
9. Баринова М. Н., Солопова А. Е., Тупикина Н. В., Касян Г. Р., Пушкарь Д. Ю. Магнитно-резонансная томография (МРТ) при пролапсе тазовых органов. Акушерство, гинекология и репродукция. 2014; 1: 37-46.
10. Podnar S., Vodusek D. Protocol for clinical neurophysiologic examination of the pelvic floor. Neurourol Urodyn. 2001; 20: 669-682.
11. Глыбочко П. В., Аляев Ю. Г., Маркосян Т. Г., Никитин С. С., Григорян В. А. Диагностика и медикаментозная терапия нейрогенных расстройств мочеиспускания. Эффективная фармакотерапия. Урология и Нефрология. 2011; 1: 12-17.
12. Дикке Г. Б. Ранняя диагностика и консервативное лечение пролапса гениталий. Главный врач Юга России. 2017; 1 (53):21-25.
13. Angelo P., Varella L., de Oliveira M. C.E., Matias M. G.L., de Azevedo M.A.R., de Almeida L. M. et al. A manometry classification to assess pelvic floor muscle function in women. PLoS One. 2017; 12: (10). DOI: org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0187045.
14. Deegan E. G., Stothers.L, Kavanagh A., Macnab A.J. Quantification of pelvic floor muscle strength in female urinary incontinence: A systematic review and comparison of contemporary methodologies. Neurolodgy and Urodynamics. 2018; 37 (1): 33-45. DOI: org/10.1002/nau.23285.
15. Kegel A.H. The nonsurgical treatment of genital relaxation; use of the perineometer as an aid in restoring anatomic and functional structure. Ann West Med Surg. 1948; 2 (5): 213-6.
16. Пневматический (цифровой) перинеометр - тренажер мышц тазового дна. Инструкция по применению.
17. Дикке Г. Б. Алгоритм ранней диагностики и консервативного лечения дисфункции тазового дна: 5 STEPS. М., 2018. 24 с.
18. Петухов В. С. Вагинальные конусы и реабилитация тазового дна (обзор литературы). Репродуктивное здоровье. Восточная Европа. 2016; 2 (6): 12-29.
19. Mehta AV, Shah ZR, Rathod P, Vyas N. Correlation of digital examination vs perineometry in measuring the pelvic floor muscles strength of young continent females. IJHSR. 2014; 4 (5): 185-192.
20. Macêdo LC, Lemos AA, Vasconcelos D, Katz L, Amorim MMR. Correlation between electromyography and perineometry in evaluating pelvic floor muscle function in nulligravidas: A cross-sectional study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018; 37 (5): 1658-66. DOI: 10.1002/nau.23402.
21. Albrich S, Steetskamp J, Knoechel SL Porta S, Hoffmann G, Skala C. Assessment of pelvic floor muscle contractility: digital palpation versus 2D and 3D perineal ultrasound. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 293 (4): 839-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-015-3897-5.
22. Van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan AH. Pelvic floor muscle contractility: digital assessment vs transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45 (2): 217-22. DOI: 10.1002/ uog.13456.
23. Peschers UM, Gingelmaier A, Jundt K, Leib B, Dimpfl T. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength using four different techniques. Int Urogynecol J. 2001; 12: 27.
24. Frota IPR, Rocha ABO, Neto JAV, Vasconcelos CTM, De Magalhaes TF, Karbage SAL et al. Pelvic floor muscle function and quality of life in postmenopausal women with and without pelvic floor dysfunction. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2018; 97 (5): 552-559. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13305.
25. Sartori DV, Gameiro MO, Yamamoto HA, Kawano PR, Guerra R, Padovani CR, Amaro JL. Reliability of pelvic floor muscle strength assessment in healthy continent women. BMC Urol. 2015; 15: 29. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-015-0017-6.
26. Gameiro MO, Miraglia L, Gameiro LF, Padovani CR, Amaro JL. Pelvic floor muscle strength evaluation in different body positions in nulliparous healthy women and its correlation with sexual activity. Int Braz J Urol. 2013; 39(6): 847-52. DOI: 10.1590/S 1677-5538. IBJU.2013.06.11.
27. Chmielewska D, Stania M, Sobota G, Kwasna K, Btaszczak E, Taradaj J, Juras G. Impact of Different Body Positions on Bioelectrical Activity of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Nulliparous Continent Women. BioMed Research International. 2015; Article ID905897, 9p. DOI: 10.1155/2015/905897.
28. Hay-Smith E, B0 K, Berghmans L, Hendriks HJ, de Bie RA, van Waalwijk van Doorn ES. Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence in Women. Oxford, United Kingdom: The Cochrane Library, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2001: 3. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001407.
29. Дикке Г. Б. Патогенетические подходы к выбору метода лечения дисфункции тазового дна. Фарматека. 2017; 12: 30-36.
Review
For citations:
Dikke G.B., Kucheryavaya Yu.G., Sukhanov A.A., Kukarskaya I.I., Scherbatykh E.Yu. Modern methods of assessing function and strength ofpelvic muscles in women. Medical alphabet. 2019;1(1):80-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-1-1(376)-80-85
Views:
1357
Email this article 