Volumetric evaluation of bone-substituting material by means of cone-beam computed tomography in sinus-lifting planning
Abstract
Bone grafting volume assessment based on cone beam computed tomography represented in this research before and after operation is considered like one of the option for planning implants treatment. Due to low dose, high speed of getting image and reasonable price of CBCT software options could be highly recommended to use. According to results of this study the methodology of bone grafting volume measurement is proving to be corrected for planning sinus-lift surgery.
About the Authors
N. K. Nechaeva
Diana-Plus Clinic
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. A. Dolgalev
Stavropol State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Арбель Шаран, Давид Маджар. Пневматизация верхнечелюстной пазухи после удаления верхних зубов. Perio iQ 2008 (3); 15: 93-105.
2. Фабио Мазокко, Диего Лопс, Люка Гоббато, Алессандра Лолато, Юджинио Ромео, Массимо дель Фаббро. Проспективное когортное предварительное исследование трехмерных рентгенологических изменений объема трансплантатов в области верхнечелюстной пазухи. Perio iQ 2014 (25): 44-55.
3. Федерико Эрнандес-Альфаро, Мануэль Санчо-Пучадес, Ракель Гихарро-Мартинез. Полное восстановление атрофированного альвеолярного отростка верхней челюсти биоматериалами и костными трансплантатами, полученными из внутриротовых источников: проспективное клиническое исследование под контролем конусно-лучевой компьютерной томографии. Perio iQ 2013 (24): 38-55.
4. Chiapasco M., Zaniboni M., Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17 (suppl 2): 136-159.
5. Merli M., Bernardelli F., Esposito M. Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation. A novel approach using osteosynthesis microplates, bone grafts, and resorbable barriers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 581-587.
6. Misch C.M. Bonedensity, its effect on treatment planning, surgical appeoract healing and progressive toading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1999; 6:23-31.
7. Misch C.M. Maxillary autogenous bone grafting. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North AM 2011; 23: 229-238.
8. Rossi E., Andreassen J.O. Croissance de l’os maxillare et positionnement de l’implant chez un jeune patient: cas clinique. Parodont Dent Rest 2003; 23: 113-119.
9. Smiler D.G. The sinus lift graft: Basic technique and variations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997; 9:885-893.
10. Tatum H. Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30: 207-229.
11. Urban I.A., Jovanovic S.A., Lozada J.L. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: A retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24:502-510.
12. Wozney J.M., Wikesjo U.M.E. rhBMP-2: Biology and applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery and periodontics. In: Lynch SE, Marx RE, Nevins M., Wisner Lynch LA. Tissue Engineering, ed2. Chicago: Quintessence, 2008:159-177.
13. Widmark G., Andersson B., Andrup B., Carlsson G.E., Ivanoff C.J., Lindvall A.M. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts. A 1-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 474-482.
14. Zizelmann C., Schubman L.B., Block M.S., Iacono V.J. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13 (suppl): 11-45.
Review
For citations:
Nechaeva N.K., Dolgalev A.A. Volumetric evaluation of bone-substituting material by means of cone-beam computed tomography in sinus-lifting planning. Medical alphabet. 2018;3(24):12-14. (In Russ.)
Views:
216
Email this article 