Comparative biomechanical analysis and prospects for additive manufacturing of dental implants from zirconium oxide and titanium

This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of zirconium oxide dental implants, including biomechanical modeling and an assessment
of the potential for additive manufacturing. The aim of the study was to validate the effectiveness of stereolithography for creating zirconium
implants with complex geometries and compare their biomechanical behavior with their titanium counterparts. In the first stage, a finite
element analysis (FEA) was performed in Ansys Mechanical. A 3D model of the crown-abutment-implant system integrated into cortical and
cancellous bone (considered an orthotropic material) was used for the simulation. A static load of 250 N was applied to the titanium and
zirconium models in five vector configurations. The results of the von Mises equivalent stress calculations showed that zirconium implants are
characterized by a higher stress concentration within the body of the implant, but provide lower load transfer to the surrounding bone tissue
compared to titanium implants, especially under oblique impact, which is beneficial for bone preservation. In the second stage, a prototype
implant (Straumann BLT NC 8 mm) was manufactured using layer-by-layer stereolithography (SLA) from zirconia partially stabilized with yttria.
This technology allowed for the production of highly precise, thin-walled components with complex profiles, free of internal defects (cracks
and pores), and with minimal waste. After sintering at 1400–1550°C, the resulting samples demonstrated flexural strengths of approximately
1000 MPa and compressive strengths of 2070 MPa. The study results confirm that the combination of high strength properties of additively
bonded zirconia and favorable load distribution on bone tissue opens up broad possibilities for the personalized use of ceramic implants in
clinical dentistry.

1. Mohseni P, Soufi A, Chrcanovic BR. Clinical outcomes of zirconia implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;28(1):15. Published 2023 Dec 23. doi:10.1007/s00784-023-05401-8.

2. Sotova, C.; Yanushevich, O.; Kriheli, N.; Grigoriev, S.; Evdokimov, V.; Kramar, O.; Nozdrina, M.; Peretyagin, N.; Undritsova, N.; Popelyshkin, E.; et al. Dental Implants: Modern Materials and Methods of Their Surface Modification. Materials 2023, 16, 7383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16237383.

3. Grigoriev, S.; Peretyagin, N.; Apelfeld, A.; Smirnov, A.; Yanushevich, O.; Krikheli, N.; Kramar, O.; Kramar, S.; Peretyagin, P. Investigation of MAO Coatings Characteristics on Titanium Products Obtained by EBM Method Using Additive Manufacturing. Materials 2022, 15, 4535. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15134535.

4. Grigoriev S.; Smirnov A.; Pinargote N.W.S.; Yanushevic, O.; Kriheli N.; Kramar O.; Pristinskiy Y.; Peretyagin P. Evaluation of Mechanical and Electrical Performance of Aging Resistance ZTA Composites Reinforced with Graphene Oxide Consolidated by SPS. Materials 2022, 15, 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072419.

5. Branco AC, Colaço R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Recent Advances on 3D-Printed Zirconia-Based Dental Materials: A Review. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(5):1860. Published 2023 Feb 24. doi:10.3390/ma16051860.

6. Wiedemann TG, et al. Clinical Guideline for Zirconia Dental Implants: A Comprehensive and Critical Review and Update. Jour Clin Med Res. 2024;5(3):1.

7. Chongwen Zh., Xiao Wang Advancements and challenges in the application of zirconia ceramics for dental restorations. Ceramics – Silikáty 68 (4) 610-623 (2024).

8. Chiou LL, Panariello BHD, Hamada Y, Gregory RL, Blanchard S, Duarte S. Comparison of In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implants. Biomed Res Int. 2023;2023:8728499. Published 2023 Apr 15. doi:10.1155/2023/8728499.

9. Abu Al-Faraj TM, Alsubhi BM, Almarhoon AN, et al. Comparison of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Around Zirconia and Titanium Abutments in the Aesthetic Zone: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e65782. Published 2024 Jul 30. doi:10.7759/cureus.65782.

10. Chiou LL, Panariello BHD, Hamada Y, Gregory RL, Blanchard S, Duarte S. Comparison of In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implants. Biomed Res Int. 2023 Apr 15;2023:8728499. doi: 10.1155/2023/8728499. PMID: 37096222; PMCID: PMC10122594.

11. Aldhuwayhi S. Zirconia in Dental Implantology: A Review of the Literature with Recent Updates. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025;12(5):543. Published 2025 May 19. doi:10.3390/bioengineering12050543.

12. Steinherr T. Implant Materials in Focus: A Comprehensive Review of Zirconia vs. Titanium and Their Impact on Peri-Implant Health. J Oral Med and Dent Res. 5(4):1–7.

13. Abu Al-Faraj TM, Alsubhi BM, Almarhoon AN, et al. Comparison of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Around Zirconia and Titanium Abutments in the Aesthetic Zone: A Narrative Review. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e65782. Published 2024 Jul 30. doi:10.7759/cureus.65782.

14. Aldhuwayhi S. Zirconia in Dental Implantology: A Review of the Literature with Recent Updates. Bioengineering (Basel). 2025;12(5):543. Published 2025 May 19. doi:10.3390/bioengineering12050543.

15. Solís Pinargote N.W.; Yanushevich O.; Krikheli N.; Smirnov A.; Savilkin S.; Grigoriev S.N.; Peretyagin P. Materials and Methods for All-Ceramic Dental Restorations Using Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) Technologies – A Brief Review. Dent. J. 2024, 12, 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12030047.

16. Yiqiao Wang, Le Fan, Zhichao Hao, Yaxiong Liu, Yuanyuan Ma, Weichang Li, Tao Yang, Wei Teng, 3D-printing bionic-patterned zirconia via stereolithography promotes soft tissue integration for ceramic implants, Ceramics International, Volume 49, Issue 13, 2023, Pages 21602-21612, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.296.

17. Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Mohammed Ahmed Alghauli, Marwan Hamed Awad Aljohani, Muhammad Sohail Zafar, Advanced additive manufacturing in implant dentistry: 3D printing technologies, printable materials, current applications and future requirements, Bioprinting, Volume 42, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00356.

18. Yiqiao Wang, Le Fan, Zhichao Hao, Yaxiong Liu, Yuanyuan Ma, Weichang Li, Tao Yang, Wei Teng, 3D-printing bionic-patterned zirconia via stereolithography promotes soft tissue integration for ceramic implants, Ceramics International, Volume 49, Issue 13, 2023, Pages 21602-21612, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.296.

19. Branco AC, Colaço R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Recent Advances on 3D-Printed Zirconia-Based Dental Materials: A Review. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(5):1860. Published 2023 Feb 24. doi:10.3390/ma16051860.

20. Mohammed Alghauli, Ahmed Yaseen Alqutaibi, Sebastian Wille, Matthias Kern, 3D-printed versus conventionally milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: Trueness, precision, accuracy, biological and esthetic aspects, Journal of Dentistry, Volume 144, 2024, 104925, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104925.

21. Branco AC, Colaço R, Figueiredo-Pina CG, Serro AP. Recent Advances on 3D-Printed Zirconia-Based Dental Materials: A Review. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(5):1860. Published 2023 Feb 24. doi:10.3390/ma16051860.

22. Solís Pinargote N.W.; Smirnov A.; Peretyagin N.; Seleznev A.; Peretyagin P. Direct Ink Writing Technology (3D Printing) of Graphene-Based Ceramic Nanocomposites: A Review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1300. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10071300.

23. Smirnov A., Volosova M., Peretyagin P., Bartolomé J.F. Tribological behaviour of a 3Y-TZP/Ta ceramic-metal biocomposite against ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), Ceramics International, V. 44, Issue 2, 2018, P. 1404–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.186.

24. Sergeev Yuriy Andreevich, Dolgalev Alexander Alexandrovich, Choniashvili David Zurabovich, Avanisyan Vazgen Mikhailovich. The usage of the finite element analysis in the design of new dental implant systems // IJIM. 2023. № 1.

25. Reddy MS, Sundram R, Eid Abdemagyd HA. Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019;11(Suppl 2): S85–S91. doi:10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_296_18.

26. Liao SH, Tong RF, Dong JX. Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2008 Jan;32(1):53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 24. PMID: 17951028.

27. Cristina Falcinelli, Francesco Valente, Marcello Vasta, Tonino Traini, Finite element analysis in implant dentistry: State of the art and future directions,Dental Materials, V. 39, Issue 6, 2023, P. 539–556, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.04.002.

28. Proc IMechE Part H: J Engineering in Medicine 1–12 IMechE 2023 Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions.