Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search

Comparison of ESR measurement results obtained using the modified Westergren method and an alternative method integrated into a hematology analyzer

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-22-27-31

Abstract

Objectives. The introduction of an alternative method for measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and its combined implementation with a complete blood count (CBC) analysis into automated hematology analyzer offers a number of significant advantages for large and medium-sized laboratories: increased efficiency, standardization of the analytical process, cost reduction, and faster turnaround time. In this study, we assess the consistency of clinical results obtained using the modified Westergren method and the alternative ESR measurement method in the context of a technology transition in a high-volume laboratory practice.

Materials and methods. 414 clinical samples were studied, selected during routine testing in such a way that their ESR values were evenly distributed across the entire analytical range of this parameter. Routine testing was performed on a Ves-Matic Cube 200 analyzer (manufactured by Diesse (Italy)); samples were also tested using the alternative method implemented on a BC-6800 Plus hematology analyzer (manufactured by Mindray (PRC)). Data comparison was carried out using linear regression analysis algorithms and Bland-Altman plots.*

Results. The ESR results measured by the two methods correlated well with each other (r=0.93, y= 3.387 + 0.695x). The methods demonstrated a high degree of result agreement (P>0.05).

Conclusion. The consistency of the ESR measurement results during the transition from the modernized Westergren method to an alternative research method was ensured by a high correlation of the results obtained on both devices over the entire analytical range. The functional ESR measurement unit of the Mindray BC-6800 Plus analyzer demonstrated high accuracy and good reproducibility, which provided a faster, safer and more reliable ESR measurement method.

About the Authors

A. G. Komarov
Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Laboratory Research of the Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

Komarov Andrey G., chief specialist in Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics at Dept of Health of the Ministry of Health; director

Moscow



V. A. Malkov
Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Laboratory Research of the Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

Malkov Vladimir A., deputy director for Clinical Expertise Work

Moscow



A. M. Ulybina
Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Laboratory Research of the Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

Ulybina Anna M., head of Laboratory Center No. 21

Moscow



S. Y. Lomovtseva
Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Laboratory Research of the Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

Lomovtseva Svetlana. Yu., head of Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory No. 1 of Laboratory Center No. 21

Moscow



Y. F. Shubina
Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Laboratory Research of the Moscow City Health Department; N. I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation

Shubina Yulia F., PhD Med, head of Clinical Expertise Office; associate professor

Moscow



V. E. Kolupaev
Moscow Scientific and Practical Center for Laboratory Research of the Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

Kolupaev Vsevolod E., PhD Med, member of Committee for Standardization and
Quality Assurance of Clinical Laboratory Research of the Federation of Laboratory Medicine of the Russian Federation; head of the PBRTQC Working Group; manager of Clinical Expertise

Moscow



References

1. Amelyushkina V. A. ESR – methods of determination and clinical significance. // In the book. Laboratory diagnostics / ed. V. V. Dolgov, O. P. Shevchenko. – M .: Publ. «Reapharm». – 2005. – P. 107–109. (In Russ.).

2. Plebani M. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate: innovative techniques for an obsolete test? Clin Chem Lab Med 2003 (41): 115–6. https://doi.org/6.10.1515/CCLM.2003.019.

3. Reinhart WH. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate – more than an old fashion? Ther Umsch. 2006; (63): 108–12. https://doi.org/10.1024/0040-5930.63.1.108.

4. Reference method for the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) test on human blood. Br J Haematol. 1973; (24): 671–3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365–2141.1973.tb01693.x.

5. Kratz A, Plebani M, Peng M, et al.; International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH). ICSH recommendations for modified and alternate methods measuring the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Int J Lab Hematol. 2017; (39): 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.12693

6. Ramsay E.S, Lerman M. A. How to use the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in paediatrics. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015; (100): 30–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdis-child-2013-305349.

7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Procedures for the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate Test; Approved Standard – Fifth Edition. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2011: H02-A5.

8. Mahlangu JN, Davids M. Three-way comparison of methods for the measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. J Clin Lab Anal. 2008; (22): 346–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.20267.

9. Guofang Shu, Rui Ding, Rong Ding et al. Performance evaluation of the BC-720 auto hematology analyzer and establishment of the reference intervals of erythrocyte sedimentation rate in healthy adults. Ann Transl Med. 2022; (10): 922. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-3486

10. Yimin Shen, Dongmei Liu, Yong Wang et al. Clinical application of a new method for determination of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate using the BC-720 automated hematology analyzer. Int J Lab Hematol. 2023; (45): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14044

11. Prompetchara E., Parnsamut C., Wangviwat N. Performance evaluation of alternate ESR measurement method using BC-780 automated hematology analyzer: a comparison study with the Westergren reference method. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023; (62): 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0499.


Review

For citations:


Komarov A.G., Malkov V.A., Ulybina A.M., Lomovtseva S.Y., Shubina Y.F., Kolupaev V.E. Comparison of ESR measurement results obtained using the modified Westergren method and an alternative method integrated into a hematology analyzer. Medical alphabet. 2025;(22):27-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-22-27-31

Views: 63


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)