

Identification of the activation of the epidemic process of nosocomial purulentseptic infections based on the results of comparing the current incidence rate with the ordinary
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-16-60-63
Abstract
Purpose of the study. Using the example of a cardiac surgical hospital, to study the possibility of detecting the activation of the epidemic process of purulent septic infections (GSI) based on the results of comparing the current incidence rate with the ordinary.
Materials and methods. Cases of GSI in operated adult patients of a cardiac surgery hospital were actively identified based on examination of medical histories using standard case definitions. The control (ordinary) level was considered to be the incidence rate not exceeding the upper limit of the median monthly indicators for 2018–2022. The current monthly incidence in 2023 was compared with the resident.
Results. The average monthly median incidence of GSI in adult patients of a cardiac surgical hospital for 2018–2022 was 16,1, the upper confidence limit of the median was 23,2 per 1000 operated patients. In the analyzed 2023, the excess of the actual incidence of GSI over the ordinary was detected in July. The increase in morbidity occurred due to an increase in the number of cases of infection of the surgical intervention area due to a violation of the standard procedure for dressing the surgical wound of operated patients.
Conclusion. The identification of the activation of the epidemic process of nosocomial GSI during operational monitoring is possible based on the results of comparing the current incidence rate with the ordinary, calculated on the basis of the median monthly indicators of the previous multi-year period.
About the Authors
L. G. KudryavtsevaRussian Federation
Kudryavtseva Larisa G., PhD Med, epidemiologist, head of Epidemiological Dept
Perm
M. Yu. Devyatkov
Russian Federation
Devyatkov Mikhail Yu., PhD Med, associate professor at Dept of Epidemiology
Perm
V. I. Sergevnin
Russian Federation
Sergevnin Viktor I., DM Sci (habil.), professor at Dept of Epidemiology
Perm
References
1. Cherkassky B.L. Epidemiological diagnosis. L., Medicine. 1990. 208 p. (In Russ.).
2. Cherkassky B.L. Handbook of general epidemiology. M., Medicine. 2001. 560 p. (In Russ.).
3. Sergevnin V.I., Klyuchareva N.M. Preepidemic diagnosis of incidence of nosocomial purulent-septic infections. Public health and habitat. 2018; 1 (298): 27–29. (In Russ.).
4. Simonova E.G., Sergevnin V.I. Pre-epidemic diagnostics in the system of risk-oriented epidemiological surveillance of infectious diseases. Epidemiology and Vaccine Prevention. 2018; 17 (5): 31–37. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31631/2073–3046–2018–17–5–31–37
5. Rechkin V.I. Methodology for analyzing long-term dynamics of viral hepatitis morbidity / V.I. Rechkin, A.I. Lebedev // Viral hepatitis A and B: collection of scientific papers. L., 1988. P. 45–50. (In Russ.).
6. GOST R8.736–2011. National standard of the Russian Federation. State system for ensuring the uniformity of measurements. Direct multiple measurements. Methods of processing measurement results. (In Russ.).
7. Botvinkin A.D., Kravchenko N.A., Bayanova T.A. et al, Calculation of epidemic thresholds for incidence of community-acquired pneumonia. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine.2022;7(2): 45–55. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23946/2500-0764-2022-7-2-45-55
8. Karpova L.S., Sominina A.A, Danilenko D.M. et al. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Baselines and Thresholds Intensity Epidemics, According to the Results of Traditional Surveillance for Influenza. Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention. 2019; 18 (3): 4–13. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31631/2073-3046-2019-18-4-4-13
9. Vega T., Lozano J.E. Meerhoff T. et al. Influenza surveillance in Europe: comparing intensity levels calculated using the moving epidemic method. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses. 2015; 9 (5): 234–246. DOI: 10.1111/irv.12330
10. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated April 18, 2023 N172n «On approval of the list of risk indicators of violation of mandatory requirements in the implementation of federal state sanitary and epidemiological control (supervision)». (In Russ.).
11. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Point prevalence survey of healthcareassociated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals – protocol version 4.3. Stockholm: ECDC; 2012.
12. Sadovnikov E. E., Potseluev N. Yu., Barbarash O. L., Brusina E.B. Epidemiological features of infections associated with medical care in cardiac surgery. Fundamental and Clinical Medicine. 2023; 8 (4): 73–84. (In Russ.).
13. Badamshina G. G., Ziatdinov V. B. Analysis of long-term dynamics of morbidity of women in labor with infections associated with the provision of medical care. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2017. 12 (1): 5–8. (In Russ.).
14. Narkecvich A.N., Narkecvich A.A., Vinogradov K.A. Interval estimation of the median and its automation. 2013; 4: 40–49. (In Russ.).
15. Altman D.G., Machin D., Bryant T.N., Gardner M.J. Statistics with confidence. Bristol: J.W. Arrowsmith Ltd, 2005. 240 p.
16. Paltyshev I.P., Gerasimov A.N. Methodology for determining the timing of the beginning and end of seasonal increases. Theoretical problems of epidemiology and immunology. Abstracts of conference reports. Nalchik. 1986: 52–55. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kudryavtseva L.G., Devyatkov M.Yu., Sergevnin V.I. Identification of the activation of the epidemic process of nosocomial purulentseptic infections based on the results of comparing the current incidence rate with the ordinary. Medical alphabet. 2025;(16):60-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-16-60-63