

Comparative analysis of treatment options for stage T1–2N 0M0 non-small cell lung cancer
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-14-43-47
Abstract
Background. The standard treatment for localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is surgery. However, for inoperable patients or patients who refuse surgical treatment, radiation therapy in different fractionation regimens remains an alternative to surgery. Traditional radiation therapy does not provide treatment results similar to those after surgical treatment, but the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) changes this paradigm, allowing results comparable to surgical treatment.
Purpose. To compare the results of treatment of patients with T1–2N 0M0 stages of NSCLC depending on the treatment performed – surgery, radiation therapy in the traditional fractionation mode, stereotactic radiation therapy, combined treatment.
Materials and methods. From 2015 to 2021 on the basis of the Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, 195 patients with non-small cell lung cancer stages T1–2N 0M0 were treated. 79 patients underwent surgical treatment, 81 patients underwent radiation therapy, and the combined treatment group included 35 patients. The operation was more often performed as a lobectomy (62 people), atypical resection was performed in 17 cases. Traditional radiation therapy was performed in 66 patients, stereotactic radiation therapy in 15 patients. In the combination treatment group, radiotherapy was given after atypical resection.
Results. Overall survival (OS), regardless of treatment option, was 102 months. OS rates were high in the surgical and combined treatment groups, while median OS was not reached in the surgery group. In the radiation therapy group, OS was 54 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 83 months among all patients. PFS rates are highest with surgical treatment (1-year PFS 96 %), in the radiation therapy group the 1-year PFS was 78 %, in the combined treatment group – 80 %. There was no significant difference in OS and PFS depending on the histological subtype of the tumor. The 1-year OS rates in the radiation therapy (RT) group were comparable: after a radical course of RT in the traditional fractionation regimen – 90 %, after SBRT – 93 %. The 5-year OS rates were significantly different: 41 and 60 %, respectively. In a subgroup analysis of surgical treatment, there was a trend towards increased OS in the atypical resection group compared with lobectomy patients: 5-year OS was 80 and 77 %, respectively.
Conclusions. Surgical treatment of stages T1–2N 0M0 non-small cell lung cancer should be the main treatment method. For inoperable patients who refuse surgical treatment, SBRT should be preferred to traditional RT.
About the Authors
Zh. E. SabelnikovaRussian Federation
Zhanna E. Sabelnikova, radiotherapist, assistant
Dept of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy
Chelyabinsk
A. A. Lozhkov
Russian Federation
Alexey A. Lozhkov, PhD Med, radiotherapist
Chelyabinsk
E. Ya. Mozerova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina Ya. Mozerova, PhD Med, head of Dept, associate professor
Radiotherapy Dept № 1; Dept of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy
Chelyabinsk
M. M. Sarycheva
Russian Federation
Marina M. Sarycheva, DM Sci (habil.), radiotherapist, associate professor
Dept of Oncology, Radiation Diagnostics and Radiation Therapy
Chelyabinsk
A. A. Lukin
Russian Federation
Andrey A. Lukin, PhD Med, head physician
Chelyabinsk
E. D. Pecheritsa
Russian Federation
Egor D. Pecheritsa, head of Dept, oncologist
Thoracic Oncology Dept; Thoracic Oncology Dept
Chelyabinsk
V. Yu. Chvanova
Russian Federation
Viktoria Yu. Chvanova, trainee doctor
Radiotherapy Dept № 1
Chelyabinsk
O. A. Pogosyan
Russian Federation
Olesya A. Pogosyan, oncologist
Radiotherapy Dept № 1
Chelyabinsk
References
1. Clinical recommendations of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2022.
2. Daly ME. Inoperable Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Rationale for Systemic Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb 20; 40 (6): 539–545. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.01611. Epub 2022 Jan 5. PMID: 34985921.
3. Tandberg DJ, Tong BC, Ackerson BG, Kelsey CR. Surgery versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer : A comprehensive review. Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):667–678. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31196. Epub 2017 Dec 19. PMID: 29266226.
4. Hiley C, Salem A, Batchelor T. et al. Great debate: surgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax. 2020 Mar; 75 (3): 198–199. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214014. Epub 2020 Jan 21. PMID: 31964695.
5. Widder J, Postmus D, Ubbels JF, Wiegman EM, Langendijk JA. Survival and quality of life after stereotactic or 3D-conformal radiotherapy for inoperable early-stage lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15; 81 (4): e291–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.052. Epub 2011 Jun 2. PMID: 21640503.
6. Jeppesen SS, Schytte T, Jensen HR, Brink C, Hansen O. Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus conventional radiation therapy in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer: an updated retrospective study on local failure and survival rates. Acta Oncol. 2013 Oct; 52 (7): 1552–8. DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.813635. Epub 2013 Aug 1. PMID: 23902274.
7. Grutters JP, Kessels AG, Pijls-Johannesma M, De Ruysscher D, Joore MA, Lambin P. Comparison of the effectiveness of radiotherapy with photons, protons and carbon-ions for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Apr; 95 (1): 32–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.003. Epub 2009 Sep 3. PMID: 19733410.
8. Wrona A, Mornex F. Hypofractionation in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2021 Apr; 31 (2): 97–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.11.003. PMID: 33610276.
9. Rosenzweig K. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy as an Alternative to Surgery in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017 Jun 15; 31 (6): 492–8. PMID: 28620905.
10. Wink KCJ, van Baardwijk A, Troost EGC, De Ruysscher D. Nodal recurrence after stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non–small cell lung cancer: incidence and proposed risk factors. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017; 56: 8–15.
11. Li H, Shen Y, Wu Y. et al. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Surg Res. 2019 Nov; 243: 346–353. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.083. Epub 2019 Jul 2. PMID: 31277011.
12. Mayne NR, Lin BK, Darling AJ. et al. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Delayed Surgery for Early-stage Non-small-cell Lung Cancer. Ann Surg. 2020 Dec; 272 (6): 925–929. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004363. PMID: 33074904; PMCID: PMC 7668323.
13. Chang JY, Senan S, Paul MA. et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus lobectomy for operable stage I non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jun; 16 (6): 630–7. DOI: 10.1016/S 1470–2045 (15) 70168-3. Epub 2015 May 13. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep; 16 (9): e427. PMID: 25981812; PMCID: PMC 4489408.
14. Hanbo Chen, Joanna M. Laba, R. Gabriel Boldt et al. Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy Versus Surgery in Early Lung Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Propensity Score Studies. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 2018; 101 (Issue 1): 186–194. ISSN 0360–3016. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.064
15. Yerokun BA, Yang CJ, Gulack BC. et al. A national analysis of wedge resection versus stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage IA non–small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 154: 675–686.e4.
Review
For citations:
Sabelnikova Zh.E., Lozhkov A.A., Mozerova E.Ya., Sarycheva M.M., Lukin A.A., Pecheritsa E.D., Chvanova V.Yu., Pogosyan O.A. Comparative analysis of treatment options for stage T1–2N 0M0 non-small cell lung cancer. Medical alphabet. 2025;(14):43-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-14-43-47