

Efficacy of adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogues in recurrent type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-14-11-15
Abstract
Introduction. Neuroendocrine gastric tumor (gNETs) type 1 associated with chronic autoimmune atrophic gastritis, hypergastrinemia and usually have multifocal lesions and high frequency of local recurrence (~70 % for 2 year). Somatostatin analogs (SA) showed promised data in neoadjuvant setting with 84 % of complete response in meta-analysis.
The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy adjuvant treatment with SA for recurrent gNETs type 1.
Methods. This retrospective, single center study included patients (pts) with recurrent gNETs who received adjuvant treatment with SA. Recruitment of pts was carried from 2012 to February 2024.
Results. The study included 35 pts, 33 females and 2 males. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was performed in 34 cases (97.1 %), gastric resection in 1 (2.9 %). The median of previous EMR was 2 (1–6). The most of pts have multifocal lesions – 28 (80 %), the median of lesions is 5. Tumor size >10 mm was observed at 2 cases (5.7 %), the median size – 6 mm. One pts had N+. The median of Ki67 was 3,5 % (1–10 %), 21 (60 %) pts have G2 tumors and 14 (40 %) – G1. All pts received adjuvant therapy with SA, 33 (94.3 %) long-active octreotide 30 mg and 2 (5.7 %) lanreotide 120 mg. The time of SA therapy was <12 months in 23 cases (65.7 %) and ≥ 12 months at 12 (34.3 %). With a median follow-up of 30.5 months, median DFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI 67-NR]. Adjuvant SA reduced gastrin levels after a year of therapy by ≥50 % from baseline in 13 cases (37.1 %). We compared DFI after previous EMR (DFS 1) and DFS after EMR with adjuvant SA (DFS 2), DFS 2 was significantly higher – not reached (95 % CI, 67 – NR) versus 8.8 months (95 % CI 2.7–14.9, p<0.01). Adjuvant treatment with SA ≥ 12 months was associated with improve DFS – 61 months (95 % CI 26.2–96.2) versus not reached (95 % CI 58.1 – NR, p = 0.05). No cases of death due to disease progression were observed.
Conclusions. Adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogs significantly reduced gastrin levels and improved disease-free survival, demonstrating their antiproliferative effect in type 1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. However, given the favorable prognosis and low risk of regional or distant metastases, the role of these agents in the treatment of gastric NETs requires further clarification in prospective studies.
About the Authors
K. R. GadzhievaRussian Federation
Kizler R. Gadzhieva, resident physician
Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy; Institute of Surgery; Dept of Oncology and Radiotherapy
Moscow
Yа. A. Zhulikov
Russian Federation
Yaroslav A. Zhulikov, oncologist
Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 1
Moscow
A. A. Markovich
Russian Federation
Alla A. Markovich, PhD Med, senior researcher
Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 1
Moscow
E. V. Evdokimova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina V. Evdokimova, oncologist
Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 1
Moscow
V. A. Gorbunova
Russian Federation
Vera A. Gorbunova, DM Sci (habil.), professor, chief researcher
Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 1
Moscow
G. S. Emelyanova
Russian Federation
Galina S. Emelyanova, PhD Med, associate professor, oncologist
Dept of Oncology; Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 1
Moscow
O. A. Malikhova
Russian Federation
Olga A. Malikhova, DM Sci (habil.), endoscopist
Moscow
I. A. Karasev
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Karasev, PhD Med, senior researcher
Dept of Endoscopy
Moscow
A. A. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Kuznetsova, oncologist
Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 1
Moscow
V. V. Delektorskaya
Russian Federation
Vera V. Delektorskaya, DM Sci (habil.), leading researcher, pathologist
Moscow
A. K. Kachmazova
Russian Federation
Abidat K. Kachmazova, oncologist, postgraduate student
Dept of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 11 and FPDO; Dept of Oncology
Moscow
E. V. Artamonova
Russian Federation
Elena V. Artamonova, DM Sci (habil.), head of Department, professor, head of Dept
Department of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 1; Dept of Oncology and Radiotherapy; Dept of Oncology and Thoracic Surgery
Moscow
I. S. Stilidi
Russian Federation
Ivan S. Stilidi, DM Sci (habil.), academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
professor, chief freelance oncologist
Moscow
References
1. Dasari A., Shen C., Halperin D., Zhao B., Zhou S., Xu Y., Shih T., Yao J. C. Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017; 3 (10): 1335–1342. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589
2. Masui T., Ito T., Komoto I., Uemoto S. JNETS Project Study Group. Recent epidemiology of patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) in Japan: a population-based study. BMC Cancer. 2020; 20 (1): 1104. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07581-y
3. Zheng R., Zhao H., An L., Zhang S., Chen R., Wang S., Sun K., Zeng H., Wei W., He J. Incidence and survival of neuroendocrine neoplasms in China with comparison to the United States. Chin Med J (Engl). 2023; 136 (10): 1216–1224. DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002643.
4. Neuroendocrine tumors. General principles of diagnosis and treatment : a practical guide / edited by V.A. Gorbunova. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2021. 600 p.: ill. DOI: 10.33029/9704-5997-3-NEU-2021-1-600
5. Burkitt M. D., Pritchard D. M. Review article: Pathogenesis and management of gastric carcinoid tumours. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 24 (9): 1305–1320. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03130.x
6. Panzuto F, Ramage J, Pritchard DM. et al. European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for gastroduodenal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) G1–G3. J Neuroendocrinol. 2023; 35 (8): e13306. DOI: 10.1111/jne.13306
7. Maly M., Callebout E., Ribeiro S. et al. Neuroendocrine tumors in the stomach: An epidemiological analysis of Belgian Cancer Registry data 2010–2019. J Neuroendocrinol. 2024. DOI: 10.1111/jne.13473
8. Pritchard D. M. Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: still a diagnostic challenge in the 21<sup>st</sup> century? Gastroenterology. 2011; 140 (5): 1380–1383. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.03.026
9. Fave G., Kwekkeboom D., Cutsem E. et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Gastroduodenal Neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology. 2012; 95: 74–87. DOI: 10.1159/000335595
10. Yun Song et al. Classification of gastric neuroendocrine tumors and associations with survival. JCO. 2024; 42: 597–597. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.597
11. Ahlman H., Kolby L., Lundell L. et al. Clinical Management of Gastric Carcinoid Tumors. Digestion. 1994; 55 (Suppl. 3):77–85. DOI: 10.1159/000201206
12. Rindi G., Bordi C., Rappel S. et al. Gastric carcinoids and neuroendocrine carcinomas: pathogenesis, pathology, and behavior. World J Surg. 1996; 20 (2): 168–172. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900026
13. Vanoli A., La Rosa S., Miceli E. et al. Prognostic Evaluations Tailored to Specific Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Analysis Of 200 Cases with Extended Follow-Up. Neuroendocrinology. 2018; 107 (2): 114–126.
14. Borch K., Ahrén B., Ahlman H. et al. Gastric carcinoids: biologic behavior and prognosis after differentiated treatment in relation to type. Ann Surg. 2005; 242 (1): 64–73. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167862.52309.7d
15. Dias A. R., Azevedo B. C., Alban L. B.V. et al. GASTRIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR: REVIEW AND UPDATE. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017; 30 (2): 150–154. DOI: 10.1590/0102-6720201700020016
16. Merola E., Sbrozzi-Vanni A., Panzuto F. et al. Type I gastric carcinoids: a prospective study on endoscopic management and recurrence rate. Neuroendocrinology. 2012; 95 (3): 207–213. DOI: 10.1159/000329043
17. Khuroo M. S., Khuroo M. S., Khuroo N. S. Treatment of type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors with somatostatin analogs. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 25: 548–554. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06131.x
18. Jianu C. S., Fossmark R., Syversen U. et al. Five-year follow-up of patients treated for 1 year with octreotide long-acting release for enterochromaffin-like cell carcinoids. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010; 46 (4): 456–463. DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2010.539255
19. Massironi S., Zilli A., Conte D. Somatostatin analogs for gastric carcinoids: For many, but not all. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21 (22): 6785–6793. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6785
20. Rossi RE, Invernizzi P, Mazzaferro V, Massironi S. Response and relapse rates after treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs in multifocal or recurrent type-1 gastric carcinoids : A systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Mar; 8 (2): 140–147. DOI: 10.1177/2050640619890465. Epub 2019 Nov 22. PMID: 32213066; PMCID: PMC 7079271.
21. Campana D., Nori F., Pezzilli R., Piscitelli L., Santini D., Brocchi E., Corinaldesi R., Tomassetti P. (2008). Gastric endocrine tumors type I: treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs. Endocrine-Related Cancer, 15 (1), 337–342. Retrieved Jan 8, 2025, from doi: 10.1677/ERC-07–0251
Review
For citations:
Gadzhieva K.R., Zhulikov Y.A., Markovich A.A., Evdokimova E.V., Gorbunova V.A., Emelyanova G.S., Malikhova O.A., Karasev I.A., Kuznetsova A.A., Delektorskaya V.V., Kachmazova A.K., Artamonova E.V., Stilidi I.S. Efficacy of adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogues in recurrent type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors. Medical alphabet. 2025;(14):11-15. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-14-11-15