Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Modern monitoring methods informativeness in assessing the risk of hemodynamic disorders in on pump cardiac surgery (pilot study)

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-35-29-38

Abstract

The objective was to study the prognostic significance of intraoperative parameters of pulmonary artery catheterization (PAC), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) in relation to the hemodynamic disorders in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Material and Methods. A prospective observational study involved 67 patients aged 53 [46–64] years who underwent on-pump CABG. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded after the induction of anesthesia (stage I) and at the end of the surgery (stage II). Hemodynamic disorders were considered to be the inotropic index in post-bypass period >5, the duration of inotropic support >12 hours, the intensive care unit (ICU) stay >24 hours, the use of intraaortic balloon pumping (IABP), the ICU mortality, the presence of one or more complications (composite outcome). Logistic regression and ROC analysis were used.
Results. At stage I, the left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) cut-off <31.7 gs•m/m2 was associated with ICU stay >24 hours (OR 0.9291, 95 % CI 0.8670–0.9958, AUC 0.716), and LVSWI <32.5 gs•m/m2 – with a composite the outcome (OR 0.9550, 95 % CI 0.9133–0.9985, AUC 0.704). The left ventricular area contraction fraction <34.2 % predicted the use of IABP (OR 0.9089, 95 % CI 0.8397–0.9839, AUC 0.889). At the II stage, the LVSWI cut-off <28.8 gs•m/m2 was associated with ICU stay >24 hours (OR 0.8805, 95 % CI 0.8226–0.9884, AUC 0.716), cut-off <25.6 gs•m/m2 – with the use of IABP (OR 0.8274, 95 % CI 0.7101–0.9641, AUC 0.804), and cut-off <23.0 gs•m/m2 – with mortality (OR 0.7486, 95 % CI 0.5951–0.9415, AUC 0.892). The left ventricular ejection fraction <26.1 % was also associated with mortality (OR 0.8901, 95 % CI 0.8164–0.9705, ACC 0.948). The global heart ejection fraction <18 % was associated with a composite outcome (OR 0.9018, 95 % CI 0.8297–0.9802, AUC 0.716). The other predictors cut-off values were practically normal. The remaining indicators provided models of average quality or had no predictive significance.
Conclusion. To assess the risk of possible hemodynamic disorders in on-pump CABG, PAC and TEE are the most informative. In prebypass and in postbypass periods, LVSWI, reduced by 1.5–2.2 times, is associated with the risk of various hemodynamic complications and prolonged ICU stay. Decreased TEE parameters of left ventricular systolic function is associated with myocardial dysfunction and with the risk of mortality. The prognostic significance of the TPTD needs further investigations.

About the Authors

I. A. Kozlov
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Kozlov Igor A., DM Sci (habil.), professor at Dept of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology

Moscow



L. A. Krichevskiy
S.S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital; Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Professional Education
Russian Federation

Krichevskiy Lev A., DM Sci (habil.), Head of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department № 2;

Head of Anesthesiology and Renimatology Department

Moscow



A. M. Ovezov
M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
Russian Federation

Ovezov Alexey M., DM Sci (habil.), head of Dept of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology

Moscow



V. Yu. Rybakov
S.S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Rybakov Vladislav Yu., anesthesiologist

Moscow



References

1. Leonov N. P., Strunin O. V., Poletaeva N. V., Lomivorotov V. V., Karaskov A. M. Cardiac output measurement in the children after cardiac surgery: comparison of ultrasound monitoring of cardiac output and echocardiography. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2018; 15 (4): 42–47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21292/2078–5658–2018–15–4–42–47

2. Smetkin A. A., Hussain A., Fot E. V., Zakharov V. I., Isotova N. N., Yudina A. S., Dityateva Z. A., Gromova Ya.V., Kuzkov V. V., Kirov M. Yu. Invasive monitoring of cardiac output by pulse wave transit time after aortocoronary bypass on the beating heart. Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2016; 13 (5): 4–10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21292/2078–5658–2016–13–5–4–10

3. Arora D., Mehta Y. Recent trends on hemodynamic monitoring in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016; 19 (4): 580–583. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971–9784.191557.

4. Bignami E., Belletti A., Moliterni P., Frati E., Guarnieri M., Tritapepe L. Clinical practice in perioperative monitoring in adult cardiac surgery: is there a standard of care? Results from an national survey. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2016; 30 (3): 347–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877–015–9725–4

5. Carl M., Alms A., Braun J., Dongas A., Erb J., Goetz A., Goepfert M., Gogarten W., Grosse J., Heller A. R., Heringlake M., Kastrup M., Kroener A., Loer S. A., Marggraf G., Markewitz A., Reuter D., Schmitt D. V., Schirmer U., Wiesenack C., Zwissler B., Spies C. S 3 guidelines for intensive care in cardiac surgery patients: hemodynamic monitoring and cardiocirculary system. Ger. Med. Sci. 2010; 8: Doc12. https://doi.org/10.3205/000101

6. Grant M. C., Salenger R., Lobdell K. W. Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring in cardiac surgery. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2024; 37 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001327

7. Klinkmann G., Reuter D. A., Haas S. A. Hemodynamic Monitoring and Optimization in Cardiac Surgery. In: Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring: Basics and New Horizons. /Ed. Kirov M. Y., Kuzkov V. V., Bernd S. Springer, 2021: 197–208. ISBN 973–030–71751–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–71752–0

8. Kuzkov V. V., Kirov M. Yu. Invazivnyj monitoring gemodinamiki v intensivnoj terapii i anesteziologii. 2 izd. Arhangel’sk: Severnyj gosudarstvennyj medicinskij universitet, 2015. 392. (In Russ.). ISBN 978–5–91702–180–5

9. Moh’d A.F., Khasawneh M. A., Al-Odwan H.T., Alghoul Y. A., Makahleh Z. M., Altarabsheh S. E. Postoperative Cardiac Arrest in Cardiac Surgery-How to Improve the Outcome? Med. Arch. 2021; 75 (2): 149–153. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2021.75.149–153.

10. Izotova N. N., Ilyina Ya. Yu., Fot E. V., Smetkin A. A., Kuzkov V. V., Kirov M. Yu. Ultrasound monitoring of cardiac output after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Russian Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimatology = Anesteziologiya I Reanimatologiya. 2019; 2: 48–55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/anaesthesiology201902148

11. Lenkin A. I., Paromov K. V., Smetkin A. A., Kuzkov V. V., Slastilin V. Yu., Kirov M. Yu. Correction of Hemodynamic Disorders in the Complex Surgical Correction of Acquired Cardiac Valvular Defects. General Reanimatology. 2011; 7 (6): 10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813–9779–2011–6–10

12. Kirov M. Yu., Lenkin A. I., Kuzkov V. V. Use of Transpulmonary Thermodilution-based Volumetric Monitoring During Cardiosurgical Interventions. General Reanimatology. 2005; 1 (6): 70–79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813–9779–2005–6–70–79

13. Combes A., Berneau J. B., Luyt C. E., Trouillet J. L. Estimation of left ventricular systolic function by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30 (7): 1377–1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134–004–2289–2

14. De Backer D., Vincent J. L. The pulmonary artery catheter: is it still alive? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2018; 24 (3): 204–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000502

15. Júnior C. G., Botelho E. S., Diego L. A. Intraoperative monitoring with transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgery. Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. 2011; 61 (4): 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034–7094(11)70058–7

16. Slama M., Maizel J. Echocardiographic measurement of ventricular function. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2006; 12 (3): 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccx.0000224869.86205.1a

17. Kovalev A. A., Kuznetsov B. K., Yadchenko A. A., Ignatenko V. A. Assessment of the quality of a binary classifier in research. Health and Ecology Issues. 2020; (4): 105–113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51523/2708–6011.2020–17–4–15

18. Bouchard M. J., Denault A., Couture P., Guertin M. C., Babin D., Ouellet P., Carrier M., Tardif J. C. Poor correlation between hemodynamic and echocardiographic indexes of left ventricular performance in the operating room and intensive care unit. Crit. Care. Med. 2004; 32 (3): 644–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000108877.92124.df

19. Zitzmann A., Daniel A. Reuter D. A., Loser B. Pulmonary Artery Thermodilution. In: Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring: Basics and New Horizons / Ed. Kirov M. Y., Kuzkov V. V., Bernd S. Springer, 2021: 51–59. ISBN 978–3–030–71751–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–71752–0

20. Kashiyama N., Toda K., Miyagawa S., Yoshikawa Y., Hata H., Yoshioka D., Sawa Y. Left ventricular stroke work index associated with outcome after mitral valve surgery for functional regurgitation in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 32 (4): 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2019.10.007

21. Choi J. O., Lee S. C., Choi S. H., Kim S. M., Choi J. H., Park J. R., Song B. G., Chang S. A., Park S. J., Park S. W., Park P. W. Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular stroke work index in patients with severe mitral regurgitation: correlation with invasive measurement and exercise capacity. Echocardiography. 2010; 27 (10): 1161–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–8175.2010.01222.x

22. Jentzer J. C., Anavekar N. S., Burstein B. J., Borlaug B. A., Oh J. K. Noninvasive Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Stroke Work Index Predicts Mortality in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2020; 13 (11): e011642. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.120.011642

23. Kronzon I. Diagnosis and treatment of iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysm: a review. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 1997; 10 (3): 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894–7317(97)70061–0

24. Lee M. O., Jeong K. U., Kim K. M., Song Y. G. Risk Factors Affecting Complications of Access Site in Vascular Intervention through Common Femoral Artery. Niger J. Clin. Pract. 2022; 25 (1): 85–89. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_37_21

25. Lopes M. C., de Cleva R., Zilberstein B., Gama-Rodrigues J. J. Pulmonary artery catheter complications: report on a case of a knot accident and literature review. Rev. Hosp. Clin. Fac. Med. Sao Paulo. 2004; 59 (2): 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0041–87812004000200006

26. Dzybinskaya Y. V., Krichevsky L. A., Kharlamova I. E., Kozlov I. A. Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Assessment of Indications for and Contraindications to Early Activation after Myocardial Revascularization. General Reanimatology. 2011; 7 (1): 42–47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15360/1813–9779–2011–1–42

27. Sandrikov V. A., Fedulova S. V., Kulagina T. Yu., Dzeranova A. N., Khadzhieva D. R. Transesophageal echocardiography in the intraoperative and intensive care periods in cardiac surgery. Anesteziol. Reanimatol. 2017; 62 (4): 282–285. (In Russ.) http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/0201–7563–2017–62–4–282–285


Review

For citations:


Kozlov I.A., Krichevskiy L.A., Ovezov A.M., Rybakov V.Yu. Modern monitoring methods informativeness in assessing the risk of hemodynamic disorders in on pump cardiac surgery (pilot study). Medical alphabet. 2024;(35):29-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-35-29-38

Views: 114


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)