Modern possibilities of neuroimaging methods in the motor control system research and in clinical practice
Abstract
Motor system characterized by the complex organization, with the analysis and understanding of integrative mechanisms underlying the implementation of a variety of motor acts continue to be valid until the end of the unsolved problems. The article discusses the most common methods of investigation of the motor system, in particular, how they work, and the advantages of using different diagnostic possibilities.
About the Author
E. V. Ekusheva
First Moscow State Medical University n.a. I.M. Sechenov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Никитин С.С., Куренков А.А. Магнитная стимуляция в диагностике и лечении болезней нервной системы: руководство для врачей / С.С. Никитин, А.А. Куренков. - М.: САШКО, 2003. - 378 с.
2. Haas B. Motor Control. In: T. Everett, C. Kell (eds.). Human Movement. Edinburgh: Churchill, Livingstone. 2010: 47-60.
3. Bonaiuti D., Grimaldi M. Neuroimaging: a new challenge in neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Eura. Medicophys. 2007; 43 (2): 215-219.
4. Добрынина А.А. Возможности функциональной и структурной нейровизуализации в изучении восстановления двигательных функций после ишемического инсульта. Анналы неврологии. 2011; 5 (3): 53-61.
5. Меллер Т.Б., Райф Э. Укладки и режимы при магнитно-резонансной томографии. Пер. с нем. Под общ. ред. Ш.Ш. Шотемора. - М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2008. - 232 с.
6. Труфанов Г.Е. Лучевая диагностика. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2011. - 416 с.
7. Moser E., Meyerspeer M., Fischmeister F. et. al. Windows on the human body - in vivo highfield magnetic resonance research and applications in medicine and psychology. Sensors (Basel). 2010; 10 (6): 5724-5757.
8. Copen W.A., Lev M.H. Acute ischemic stroke: an evidence-based approach. Eds. by D.G. Greer. Willey-Liss; 2007: 3-39.
9. Jang S.H. The role of the corticospinal tract in motor recovery in patients with a stroke: а review. Neuro Rehabilitation. 2009; 24 (3): 285-290.
10. Perez M.A., Cohen L G. The corticospinal system and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2009; 16 (4): 254-269.
11. Stinear C.M., Barber P.A., Smale P.R. et.al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007; 130: 170-180.
12. Lee J.S., Han M-K., Kim S.H. et al. Fiber tracking by diffusion tensor imaging in corticospinal tract stroke: Topographical correlation with clinical symptoms. Neuro Image. 2005; 26: 771-776.
13. Basser P.J., Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J. Magn. Reson. B. 1996; 111: 209-219.
14. Konishi J., Yamada K., Kizu O. et al. MR tractography for the evaluation of functional recovery from lenticulostriate infarcts. Neurology. 2005; 64: 108-113.
15. Bruno A.A. Motor recovery in stroke. In: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. M. J. Klein et al. (eds.). Medicine; 2002: 452-489.
16. Deichmann R., Nöth U., Weiskopf N. The basic of functional magnetic resonance imaging. EEG-fMRI. Physiological basis, technique and applications. Eds. Mulert C., Lemieux L. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010: 39-62.
17. Schmuel A. Locally measured neuronal correlates of functional MRI signals. EEG-fMRI. Physiological basis, technique and applications. Eds. Mulert C., Lemieux L. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010: 63-82.
18. Ward N.S. Future perspectives in functional neuroimaging in stroke recovery. Eura. Medicophys. 2007; 43: 285-294.
19. Matthews P.M., Honey G.D., Bullmore E.T. Applications of fMRI in translational medicine and clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006; 7: 732-744.
20. Logothetis N.K. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008; 453 (12): 869-878.
21. Rossini P.M., Burke D., Chen R. et al. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2015; 126: 1071-1107.
22. Romero J.R., Anschel D., Sparing R., Gangitano M., Pascual-Leone A., Subthreshold low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation selectively decreases facilitation in the motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002; 113(1): 101-107.
23. Екушева Е.В. Использование транскраниальных ответов для анализа степени вовлечения верхнего мотонейрона в патологический процесс у больных рассеянным склерозом. Врач-аспирант. 2011; 1.1 (44): 153-161.
24. Talelli P., Rothwell J. Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2006; 19: 543-550.
25. Shimizu T., Hosaki A., Hino T. et al. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain. 2002; 125: 1896-1907.
26. Дамулин И.В. Особенности структурной и функциональной организации головного мозга. Журнал невр. и психиатр. им. Корсакова. 2016; 11: 163-168.
27. Bestmann S., Swayne O., Blankenburg F.et.al. Dorsal premotor cortex exerts state-dependent causal influences on activity in contralateral primary motor and dorsal premotor cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 2008; 18 (6): 1281-1291.
Review
For citations:
Ekusheva E.V. Modern possibilities of neuroimaging methods in the motor control system research and in clinical practice. Medical alphabet. 2017;1(2):18-22. (In Russ.)
Views:
328
Email this article 