Standardization of spirometry: what’s new in 2019 update. Part 1
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-9-9-14
Abstract
Spirometry is the basic method for pulmonary function evaluating but it is very dependent on the quality of performance. Currently, specialists in lung function diagnostics rely on the 2005 technical standards of spirometry, jointly developed by the American thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS), adapted for our country by the Russian Respiratory Society in 2013. New technical capabilities and research studies have shown the need to improve approaches to ensuring the measurements quality. A joint task force with experience in conducting and analyzing pulmonary functional tests assigned by the ATS and ERS has significantly updated international standards to ensure quality laboratory practice. The article discusses the standards update by the 2019 consensus, as well as the new added factors that were not previously mentioned. New standards are needed for manufacturers, clinicians, functional diagnostics specialists and researchers in order to increase the accuracy of spirometric measurements and reduce the negative impact on the patient.
About the Authors
L. D. Kiryukhina
Saint-Petersburg State Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
P. V. Struchkov
Clinical Hospital N 85 of FMBA of Russia; Academy of postgraduate education under FSBU FSCC of FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Чучалин А. Г. Современная модель врача-пульмонолога // Пульмонология. — 2012. — №4. — С. 5–15. DOI: 10.18093/0869–0189–2012–0–4–5–15
2. Müller-Brandes C., Krämer U., Gappa M. et al. LUNOKID: can numerical American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society quality criteria replace visual inspection of spirometry? // Eur. Respir. J. — 2014. — Vol.43. — P.1347–1356. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00058813
3. Hegewald M. J., Gallo H. M., Wilson E. L. Accuracy and quality of spirometry in primary care offi ces // Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. — 2016. — Vol.13, — P.2119–2124. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201605–418OC.
4. Schermer T. R. J., Verweij E. H. A., Cretier R. et al. Accuracy and precision of desktop spirometers in general practices // Respiration. — 2012. — Vol.83. — P. 344–352. DOI: 10.1159/000334320.
5. American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: snowbird workshop on standardization of spirometry // Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. — 1979. — Vol. 119. — P. 831–838.
6. Quanjer PH. Standardized lung function testing: report working party standardization of lung function tests // Bull. Eur. Physiopathol. Respir. — 1983 — Suppl. 5. — P. 1–95.
7. Statement of the American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry: 1987 update // Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. —1987. — Vol.136. — P. 1285–1298.
8. American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. — 1995. — Vol.152. — P.1107–1136.
9. Miller M. R., Crapo R., Hankinson J. et al. ATS/ERS Task Force. General considerations for lung function testing // Eur. Respir. J. — 2005. —Vol.26. — P.153–161. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034505
10. Miller M. R., Hankinson .J., Brusasco V. et al. ATS/ERS Task Force. Standardisation of spirometry // Eur. Respir. J. — 2005. —Vol.26. — P.319–338. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805
11. Pellegrino R., Viegi G., Brusasco V. et al. ATS/ERS Task Force. Interpretative strategies for lung function tests // Eur. Respir. J. — 2005. —Vol.26. — P.948–968. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205
12. Чучалин А. Г., Айсанов З. Р., Чикина С. Ю., Черняк А. В., Калманова Е. Н. Федеральные клинические рекомендации Российского респираторного общества по использованию метода спирометрии // Пульмонология, 2014. — №6 — С. 11–24.
13. Методические рекомендации по использованию метода спирометрии. Российское респираторное общество. Утверждены Минздравом России в 2016 г. [Электронный ресурс] // Spulmo.ru: информ.-образовательный портал. М., — 2016. — URL: http://spulmo.ru/upload/Клин.%20рек.%20по%20спирометрии%20(коррект.)_.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2020)
14. Graham B. L., Steenbruggen I., Miller M. R. et al. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Offi cial American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. — 2019. — Vol.200. — №4. — e70–e88. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201908–1590ST
15. Redlich C. A., Tarlo S. M., Hankinson J. L. et al. Official American Thoracic Society technical standards: spirometry in the occupational setting // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. — 2014. — Vol.189. — P.983–993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201402-0337ST.
16. Cooper B. G. An update on contraindications for lung function testing // Thorax — 2011. —Vol.66. — P. 714–723. DOI: 10.1136/thx.2010.139881. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
17. Coates A. L., Graham B. L., McFadden R. G. et al. Canadian Thoracic Society. Spirometry in primary care // Can. Respir. J. — 2013. — Vol.20. — P.13–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/615281
18. Vieira G. M., Oliveira H. B., de Andrade D. T., Bottaro M., Ritch R. Intraocular pressure variation during weight lifting // Arch. Ophthalmol. — 2006. — Vol.124. — P.1251–1254. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.124.9.1251.
19. Tiller N. B., Simpson A. J. Effect of spirometry on intra-thoracic pressures // BMC Res Notes. — 2018. — Vol.11. — P.110. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3217-9.
20. Boerrigter B. G., Bogaard H. J., Vonk-Noordegraaf A. Spirometry in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a hemodynamic roller coaster? // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. — 2012. — Vol.186. — e6–e7. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201111-1945IM.
21. Roberts C., Ward S., Walsted E., Hull J. H. Safety of pulmonary function testing: data from 20 years. Thorax. — 2018. — Vol.73. — P.385–387. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210246.
22. Katz S., Arish N., Rokach A. et al. The effect of body position on pulmonary function: a systematic review // BMC Pulm. Med. — 2018 — Vol.18:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-018-0723-4
23. Спирометры, предназначенные для измерения параметров форсированного выдоха человека. Технические требования и методы испытаний. Национальный стандарт Российской Федерации. ГОСТ Р ИСО 26782 — 2016. [Электронный ресурс] // URL: https://standartgost.ru/g/ГОСТ_Р_ИСО_26782-2016. (дата обращения: 12.01.2020)
24. Ruppel G.L., Enright P. L. Pulmonary function testing // Respir. Care. — 2012. — Vol.57. — P.165–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.01640.
25. Quanjer P. H., Capderou A., Mazicioglu M. M. et al. All-age relationship between arm span and height in different ethnic groups // Eur. Respir. J. — 2014. — 0151 Vol.44. P.905–912. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00054014.
26. Gauld L. M., Kappers J., Carlin J. B., Robertson C. F. Height prediction from ulna length // Dev. Med. Child Neurol. — 2004. — Vol.46. — P. 475–480. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162204000787
27. Quanjer P. H., Stanojevic S., Cole T. J. et al.;ERS Global Lung Function Initiative. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the Global Lung Function 2012 equations // Eur. Respir. J. — 2012. — Vol.40. — P. 1324–1343. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00080312
28. Indrakumar H. S., Venkatesh D., Adoni V. V. et al. Spirometric assessment of impact of complete dentures on respiratory performance: an in vitro stud //J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. — 2018. — Vol.19. — P. 177–180. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2233.
29. Stoller J. K., Basheda S., Laskowski D. et al. Trial of standard versus modifi ed expiration to achieve end-of-test spirometry criteria // Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. — 1993. — Vol.148. — P. 275–280.
30. Stoller J. K., McCarthy K. Benefits of a modified spirometry technique // Eur. Respir. J. — 2007. — Vol.30. — P. 813–814, author reply 814–815. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00071407.
31. Haynes J. M., Kaminsky D. A. The American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society acceptability criteria for spirometry: asking too much or not enough? // Respir. Care. — 2015. — Vol.60. — e113–e114. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04161
Review
For citations:
Kiryukhina L.D., Struchkov P.V. Standardization of spirometry: what’s new in 2019 update. Part 1. Medical alphabet. 2020;(9):9-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2020-9-9-14
Views:
1061
Email this article 