Assessment of efficiency of biorevitalization during work with skin component of aging at patients with different morphological types of involute changes of soft facial tissues
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-2-26(401)-93-96
Abstract
Materials and methods. 38 patients aged 35 to 55 years old were under the surveillance. Depending on the aging morphotype, all patients were divided into three groups. All the participants of the study were subjected to a biorevitalization procedure (BRV) according to a single protocol prepared ex-temporarily by a mixture of multicomponent and prolonged biorevitalizers (BR).
Results. After the course of BRV from three procedures it was reliably established that skin humidity increased from the initial level by 46.7 % at the absolute number (100.0 %) of patients regardless of morphotype (p < 0.01). Facial color improvement was recorded in 94.7 % of patients (p < 0.01). Length, width and depth of thin surface wrinkles on the face skin in patients with small and mixed morphotypes on average decreased by 41.1 %, 37.9 % and 50.0 %, respectively (p < 0.01). No convincing data have been obtained regarding the increase in skin elasticity, epidermis thickness and dermis. There is also no evident therapeutic effect on telangiectatic changes and non-tumor focal hyperpigmentation of facial skin. Clinical effects following the BRV course are most pronounced in patients with small-scale and mixed mofotypes. According to the patients themselves, the proposed program of injection therapy has high efficiency and safety.
About the Authors
S. S. RaytsevaRussian Federation
Moscow
S. L. Matusevich
Russian Federation
Tyumen
References
1. Смирнова И. О. Функциональная морфология старения кожи. Успехи геронтологии. 2004; 13: 44–45.
2. Le Louarn C., Buthiau D., Buis J. Facial rejuvenation and concentric malar lift: the FACE RECURVE concept. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2006; Apr; 51 (2): 99–121.
3. Райцева С. С. Актуальные вопросы инъекционных методик. Совершенство Profi. 2015; 11: 10–13.
4. Рахимуллина О. А. Эффективность современных косметологических методов: мнения специалистов и пациентов. Инъекционные методы в косметологии. 2010; 1: 2–8.
5. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic surgery national data bank: statistics 2014. Vanaman M., Fabi S. G., Carruthers J. Complications in the Cosmetic Dermatology Patient: A Review and Our Experience (Part 1). Dermatol Surg. 2016; 42 (1): 1–11.
6. Исмаилова Н. С. Биоревитализанты в мезотерапевтической практике. Сочетанные протоколы применения. Метаморфозы. 2017; 18: 62–65.
7. Юсова Ж. Ю. Инволюционные изменения кожи с учетом типа ее старения. Научные ведомости. Серия медицина. Фармация. 2012; 22 (141): 83–88.
8. Райцева С. С. Терапевтическая стратегия ведения пациентов с разными морфотипами старения в рамках программ эстетической геропротекции // Научно-практическое общество врачей косметологов Санкт-Петербурга. ФГБОУ ВО СЗГМУ им. И. И. Мечникова, кафедра косметологии: Сборник статей (выпуск 17). / Под ред. Т. Н. Корольковой. — СП-б., 2016. — С. 63–70.
Review
For citations:
Raytseva S.S., Matusevich S.L. Assessment of efficiency of biorevitalization during work with skin component of aging at patients with different morphological types of involute changes of soft facial tissues. Medical alphabet. 2019;2(26):93-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2019-2-26(401)-93-96