Updated national guidelines for spirometry. Part 4. Examples of analysis of spirometric test results in adults and children
https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-24-8-16
Abstract
The article continues a series of articles on the interpretation of the latest national recommendations on spirometry. Examples of spirogram interpretation in adults and children are considered, such spirogram variants as dysanapsis, PRISM, etc. are given. The difference in clinical conclusions when using different systems of predicted values and different approaches to assessment (as a percentage of the predicted value and by the z-criterion) is reflected.
About the Authors
L. D. Kirуukhina
Pulmonology Scientific Research Institute;
Saint Petersburg State Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Larisa D. Kiryukhina – Ph.D., Head of the Department of Functional and Ultrasound Diagnostics; Leading researcher, Head of the Research Laboratory of Functional research
Moscow, Saint Petersbur
AuthorID: 342739
P. V. Struchkov
Academy of Postgraduate Education under FSBU FSCC of FMBA of Russia;
Clinical Hospital No. 85
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Peter V. Struchkov – MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Physiology and Functional Diagnostics; Deputy Head of Diagnostic Service
Moscow
A. G. Shekina
Academy of Postgraduate Education under FSBU FSCC of FMBA of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anna G. Shekina – senior teacher of the Department of Clinical Physiology and Functional Diagnostics
Moscow
M. Yu. Kameneva
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina Y. Kameneva – MD, Leading Researcher, doctor of functional Diagnostics of the functional diagnostics office
Saint Petersbur
AuthorID: 15686
References
1. Quanjer P.H., Stanojevic S., Cole T. J. et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur. Respir. J. 2012;40(10):1324–1343. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080312.
2. Klement R.F., Lavrushin A.A., Ter-Poghosyan P.A., Kotegov Yu.M. Instructions for the formulas and tables of the main spirometry predicted values. Leningrad: Research Institute of Pulmonology, 1986. 79 p.
3. European Community for Steel and Coal: standardized lung function testing // Eur. Respir. J.– 1993.– Vol. 6., S. 16.– P. 5–40.
4. Klement R.F., Zilber N.A. Methodological features of parameters of the “flow-volume” curve in infants. Pulmonologiya. 1994;(2):17–21. (In Russ.)
5. Shiryaeva I.S., Saveliev B.P., Markov B.A. Pereverzeva N.Yu. Predicted values of the flow-volume curve of forced exhalation in children 6–16 years old. Maternal and child health issues. 1990;9:8–11.
6. Knudson R.J., Slatin R.C., Lebowitz M.D. and Burrows, B. (1976) The Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curve. Normal standards, Variability, and Effects of Age. American Review of Respiratory Disease, 113, 587–600.
7. Zapletal A., Paul T., Samanek N. Die Bedeutung heutiger Methoden der Lungen – funktionsdiagnostik zur Feststellung einer Obstruktion der Atemwege bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Z Erkrank Atm – Org 1977;149:343–371.
8. Graham B.L., Steenbruggen I., Miller M.R. et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019. Update an official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019; 200 (8): e70–88. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST.
9. Kameneva M.Yu., Cherniak A.V., Aisanov Z.R., et al. Spirometry: national guidelines for the testing and interpretation of results. Pulmonology. 2023;33(3):307–340. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2023-33-3-307-340.
10. Struchkov P.V., Drozdov D.V., Lukina O.F., Kamrntva M.Yu. Spirometry. Manual for doctors. M. «GEOTAR-Media», 2025. 128 p.
11. Kameneva M. Yu., Kirуukhina L. D., Struchkov P. V. Updated national guidelines for spirometry. Part 2. An Approach to Interpreting Spirometry. Medical alphabet. 2024;(6):7–15. https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2024-6-7-15.
12. Stanojevic S., Kaminsky D.A., Miller M.R. et al. ERS/ATS technical standard on interpretive strategies for routine lung function tests. Eur. Respir. J. 2022; 60(1): 2101499. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01499-2021.
13. Struchkov P.V., Kiryukhina L.D., Drozdov D.V., Shchelykalina S.P., Manichev I.A. Predicted values in the lung function testing. Different predicted values – different conclusions?. Medical alphabet. 2021;(15):22–26. Медицинский алфавит. 2021;(15):22–26. https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2021-15-22-26.
Review
For citations:
Kirуukhina L.D., Struchkov P.V., Shekina A.G., Kameneva M.Yu. Updated national guidelines for spirometry. Part 4. Examples of analysis of spirometric test results in adults and children. Medical alphabet. 2025;(24):8-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-24-8-16
Views:
31
Email this article 