Administration of the metabiotic complex based on Bacillus subtilis in treatment regimens for inflammatory bowel diseases: focus on intestinal barrier permeability
https://doi.org/10.33667/207856312025171421
Abstract
The aim of the study. To determine the efficacy and safety of using the metabiotic biologically active food supplement «Bactimunal», including a combination of biologically active metabolites of Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) strain SA44 and short-chain fructooligosaccharides (scFOS, polyfructosans), prescribed additionally in treatment regimens for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).
Materials and methods of the study. 80 patients with IBD were examined, the average age was 41.1±11.14 years, of which 40 (50%) patients with UC, and 40 (50%) with CD, 38 (47.5%) men, 42 (52.5%) women. All patients underwent assessment of clinical symptoms of the disease, venousblood and fecal samples were collected to assess the serum level of trefoil factor (TFF), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), fecal zonulin (FZ) and fecal calprotectin (FC). 40 patients with IBD (20 patients with UC and 20 patients with CD) received basic therapy. 40 patients with IBD (20 patients with UC and 20 patients with CD) received the metabiotic Bactimunal 1 capsule 2 times a day in addition to the basic treatment regimens for 28 days. The observation period for patients in both groups was 28 days, at the end of the observation, the severity of clinical symptoms and intestinal permeability markers (TFF, LPS and FC) were re-evaluated. Statistical data processing was performed using the SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) program. Values of p<0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.
Results of the study. In UC, abdominal pain syndrome in the group of patients taking Bactimunal was noted by 15 (75%) patients before the start of adjuvant therapy, after – 9 (45%) (χ2 =2.604, p=0.05), in the group without Baсtimunal, abdominal pain was noted by 12 (60%) patients before treatment and 7 (35%) patients after (χ2 =0.004, p=0.48). In the group of patients with CD who additionally received Bactimunal, all 20 (100%) patients noted abdominal pain at the beginning of the observation, after 28 days, abdominal pain was felt by only 11 (55%) patients (χ2 =9.176, p=0.002). At the beginning of the observation, in the group without Bactimunal, abdominal pain was felt by 19 (95%) patients, and after 28 days it persisted in 18 (90%) patients. In patients with IBD who did not receive the metabiotic, the average pain intensity score before treatment was 2.55 points, after – 1.39 points (p>0.05). In IBD patients who received adjuvant therapy with Bactimunal, the average pain scores statistically significantly decreased – from 2.65 points at the beginning of the observation to 0.68 points after 28 days (p=0.025). During dynamic control after 28 days, the frequency of bowel movements decreased in both groups (mean frequency 2.74±0.84 bowel movements/day), statistically significant differences between the groups receiving and not receiving Bactimunal were not revealed (p>0.05). In patients who additionally took Bactimunal, the decrease in the scores of urgencies to defecate in both UC and CD was statistically significantly greater than in patients who did not receive the dietary supplement. In patients with IBD from the group receiving additional therapy with Bactimunal, a statistically significant decrease in the frequency of occurrence and severity of flatulence was noted after 28 days compared to patients in the group not receiving the dietary supplement. In all patients with IBD laboratory markers reflecting the state of the mucosal barrier of the gastrointestinal tract were significantly elevated upon inclusion in the study. In IBD patients additionally receiving Bactimunal in their treatment regimens, a decrease in the average TFF level was registered after 28 days of observation. When assessing the LPS indicators, multidirectional changes were obtained. Normalization of FC concentration occurred in 32 (80%) IBD patients taking Bactimunal, compared with 8 (20%) patients who did not receive Bactimunal as adjuvant therapy (OR=1.5; 95% CI 1.4–3.7; p=0.05) (Table 5). In patients with mild IBD, a decrease in the FC level was observed in 62.5% patients taking Bactimunal, in another group of patients, a decrease in the FC level was noted in 38.5% patients (OR=1.6; 95% CI 1.1–2.49; p=0.03).
Conclusions. Metabiotic therapy, prescribed in addition to the basic one, is promising in patients with IBD. The results of the study suggest that in the case of mild IBD additional therapy with Bactimunal can contribute to modulation of the permeability of the intestinal barrier and reduction of the inflammatory process.
About the Authors
M. I. SkalinskayaRussian Federation
Skalinskaya Maria I., PhD Med, associate professor, associate professor at Dept of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, Gastroenterology and Dietetics named after S.M. Ryss
Saint Petersburg
Scopus Author ID: 56848239600
ResearcherID: B‑9549-2016
I. G. Bakulin
Russian Federation
Bakulin Igor G., DM Sci (habil.), professor, director of the Institute of Therapy head of Dept of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, Gastroenterology and Dietetics named after S.M. Ryss
Saint Petersburg
Scopus Author ID6603812937
ResearcherID: B‑9549-2016
E. B. Avalueva
Russian Federation
Avalueva Elena B., DM Sci (habil.), professor, professor at Dept of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, Gastroenterology and Dietetics named after S.M. Ryss
Saint Petersburg
Scopus Author ID8902888000
ResearcherID: L‑2666-2014
I. V. Lapinsky
Russian Federation
Lapinsky Igor V., PhD Med, assistant at Dept of Propaedeutics of Internal Diseases, Gastroenterology and Dietetics
Saint Petersburg
Scopus Author ID: 57460171600
L. B. Gaikovaya
Russian Federation
Gaykovaya Larisa B., DM Sci (habil.), associate professor, head of Dept of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics, Biological and General Chemistry named after V.V. Sokolovsky
Saint Petersburg
Scopus Author ID: 56700366300
A. A. Sinitsa
Germany
Sinitsa Andrey A., Research Associate at Scientific Dept
Hamburg
References
1. Clinical and demographic characteristics and treatment approaches in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis) in the Russian Federation. First results of the National Registry analysis / E.A. Belousova, Yu.A. Shelygin, S. I. Achkasov [et al.]. Coloproctology. 2023; 22 (1 (83): 65–82. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073 7556 2023 22 1-65-82.– EDN IMBCQN.
2. Neurath MF. Strategies for targeting cytokines in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2024 Aug; 24 (8): 559–576. DOI: 10.1038/s41577 024 01008 6. Epub 2024 Mar 14. PMID: 38486124.
3. Inflammatory bowel diseases: transformation of ideas / I.V. Maev, I.G. Bakulin, M.I. Skalinskaya, E.V. Skazyvaeva. Therapeutic archive. 2023; 95 (12): 1064–1074. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2023.12.202507.– EDN LIYFTI.
4. de Souza H.S., Fiocchi C. Immunopathogenesis of IBD: Current state of the art. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016; 13: 13–27. DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.18
5. Crohn’s disease (K50), adults Yu. A. Shelygin, V. T. Ivashkin, S. I. Achkasov [and others]. Coloproctology. 2023; 22 (3 (85): 10–49. DOI: 10.33878/2073 7556 2023 22 3–10–49.– EDN CQJBNA. Ulcerative colitis (K51), adults / Yu.A. Shelygin, V. T. Ivashkin, E.A. Belousova [and others]. Coloproctology. 2023; 22 (1(83): 10–44. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.33878/2073 7556 2023 22 1-10-44.– EDN GDYCMT.
6. Belousova E.A., Khalif I.L., Abdulganieva D.I. et al. Socio-demographic characteristics, features of the course and treatment options for inflammatory bowel diseases in Russia. Results of two multicenter studies. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2018; 46 (6). (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18786/20720505 2018 46 6
7. Knyazev O.V., Belousova E.A., Abdulganieva D.I. et al. Real practice of drug therapy of moderate and severe forms of inflammatory bowel diseases in Russia, the Republic of Belarus and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Interim results of the INTENT study. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2021; 49 (7): 443–454. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18786/2072 0505 2021 49
8. Rosenthal R, Günzel D, Piontek J. et al. Claudin 15 forms a water channel through the tight junction with distinct function compared to claudin 2. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2020; 228 (1): e13334. DOI: 10.1111/apha.13334
9. Shukla PK, Gangwar R, Manda B. et al. Rapid disruption of intestinal epithelial tight junction and barrier dysfunction by ionizing radiation in mouse colon in vivo: protection by N-acetyl-l-cysteine. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 2016; 31 0(9): G705–G715. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00314.2015
10. Su L., Shen L., Clayburgh D., Nalle S.C., Sullivan E.A., Meddings J.B., Abraham C., Turner J.R. Targeted Epithelial Tight Junction Dysfunction Causes Immune Activation and Contributes to Development of Experimental Colitis. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136: 551–563. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.10.081
11. Turpin W., Lee S.H., Raygoza Garay J.A., Madsen K.L., Meddings J.B., Bedrani L., Power N., Espin-Garcia O., Xu W., Smith M.I. et al. Increased Intestinal Permeability Is Associated with Later Development of Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology. 2020; 159: 2092–2100.e5. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.005
12. Laukoetter M.G., Nava P., Lee W.Y., Severson E.A., Capaldo C.T., Babbin B.A., Williams I.R., Koval M., Peatman E., Campbell J.A. et al. JAM-A regulates permeability and inflammation in the intestine in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 2007; 204: 3067–3076. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20071416
13. Vetrano S., Rescigno M., Cera M.R., Correale C., Rumio C., Doni A., Fantini M., Sturm A., Borroni E., Repici A. et al. Unique Role of Junctional Adhesion Molecule-A in Maintaining Mucosal Homeostasis in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology. 2008; 135: 173–184. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.002
14. Cellular-differential composition of the epithelium in different phases of inflammatory bowel diseases / L.I. Bernardelli, F.A. Indeikin, L.G. Matyusheva [et al.]. Morphology. 2024; 162 (2): 127–139. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17816/morph.633461.– EDN KFNGXP.
15. Wang X, Memon AA, Palmér K, Hedelius A, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. The association of zonulin-related proteins with prevalent and incident inflammatory bowel disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 3; 22 (1): 3. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-021-02075-y. PMID: 34979917; PMCID: PMC8725386.
16. Edelblum K.L., Turner J.R. The tight junction in inflammatory disease: Communication breakdown. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009; 9: 715–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.06.022
17. Fasano A., Shea-Donohue T. Mechanisms of disease: the role of intestinal barrier function in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal autoimmune diseases. Nat Clin Pract. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 2: 416–22. DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0259
18. Metabolomic profile of blood serum in patients with ulcerative colitis: pathophysiological role, diagnostic and therapeutic significance / T. Ya. Vakhitov, S.V. Kononova, E.V. Demyanova [et al.]. Pediatric Dietology Issues. 2023; 21 (5): 5–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20953/1727 5784 2023 5 5-15.– EDN VTEFRR.
19. Etienne-Mesmin L, Chassaing B, Desvaux M, De Paepe K, Gresse R, Sauvaitre T, Forano E, de Wiele TV, Schüller S, Juge N, Blanquet-Diot S. Experimental models to study intestinal microbes-mucus interactions in health and disease. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2019 Sep 1; 43 (5): 457–489. DOI: 10.1093/femsre/fuz013. PMID: 31162610.
20. Pascal V., Pozuelo M., Borruel N., Casellas F., Campos D., Santiago A. et al. (2017). A microbial signature for Crohn’s disease. Gut. 66: 813–822. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl 2016-313235.
Review
For citations:
Skalinskaya M.I., Bakulin I.G., Avalueva E.B., Lapinsky I.V., Gaikovaya L.B., Sinitsa A.A. Administration of the metabiotic complex based on Bacillus subtilis in treatment regimens for inflammatory bowel diseases: focus on intestinal barrier permeability. Medical alphabet. 2025;(17):14-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/207856312025171421