Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Comparative analysis of scanning techniques for edentulous jaws using the intraoral scanner

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-10-90-94

Abstract

Relevance. The intraoral scanner is a device that provides an alternative to traditional dental impressions. Intraoral scanners are effective even in complex clinical cases; however, their application in patients with complete edentulism remains challenging.

Objective. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of various scanning protocols for edentulous jaws using intraoral scanner.

Materials and methods. The study utilized the Pumpa intraoral scanner to scan edentulous jaw models (Frasaco B-3). A reference scan was obtained using the Medit T710 laboratory scanner. Three scanning techniques were applied: Three-point scanning technique: Maxilla – the average match rate with the laboratory scanner was 77.20%; Mandible – 72.46%. Rocking motion-based technique: Maxilla – the average match rate with the laboratory scanner was 86.56%; Mandible – 65.44%. The second scanning technique for the mandible proved to be the riskiest in terms of results, as its use yielded a scan with a match rate with the laboratory scanner only 56%, which is unacceptable for further treatment planning and prosthetic rehabilitation. Combined technique: Maxilla – average match rate with the laboratory scanner was 89.00%; Mandible – 87.11%.

Results. The combined scanning technique (third method) demonstrated the highest accuracy and is recommended for clinical use.

Conclusion. The combined scanning technique is the most precise and should be adopted in clinical practice for scanning edentulous jaws.

About the Authors

S. V. Proskokova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Proskokova Svetlana Vladimirovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head
of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry,

Moscow



A. M. Enikeev
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Enikeev Amir Maratovich – Assistant of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry,

Moscow



A. E. Pirogov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Pirogov Andrey Evgenievich – Assistant of the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry,

Moscow



R. M. Kuliev
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Vostrikov Valery Olegovich – assistant at the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry,

Moscow



V. O. Vostrikov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Kuliev Rakhim Mutallim Ogly – assistant at the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry,

Moscow



M. D. Shcherbakov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Shcherbakov Maxim Dmitrievich – 5th year student,

Moscow



References

1. Levashov N.E., Oleinikov A.A., Romanov S.A. 3D scanning capabilities in modern dentistry. Digital Diagnostics. 2024; (5). №1S: 89–91. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/DD625965.

2. Revilla-León M., Subramanian S.G., Özcan M., Krishnamurthy V.R. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(2):107–113. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13135.

3. Yakimov I.A., Sharipov I.I. Application of 3D printing and 3D scanning in dentistry. Trends in the development of science and education. 2024; №110(16):195–199. (In Russ.) DOI 10.18411/trnio-06-2024-901.

4. Ermakov A.V., Losev A.V. Comparative review of intraoral scanners for orthodontists. Russian Dentistry. 2023;16(3):44–48. (In Russ.)

5. Proskokova S.V., Enikeev A.M., Pirogov A.E., Kuliev R.M. Prospects for the use of long-living printed temporary orthopedic structures. Bulletin of RSMU. 2024;(4):12–6. DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2024.037.

6. Kanukova L.S., Mrikaeva M.R., Ismailova M.I., Mishvelov A.E., Prokopenko Ya.A. Integration of digital technologies in dentistry and orthopedics: trends and problems. Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied research. 2024;(1):72-75. (In Russ.)

7. Saakyan M.Yu., Alekseeva N.A., Yakunina A.V., Baryshev I.I. comparison of intraoral scanning methods. Medical Almanac. 2023;4(77):97–104. (In Russ.)

8. Deferm J.T., Baan F., Nijsink J., Verhamme L., Maal T., Meijer G. Intraoral scanning of the edentulous jaw without additional markers: An in vivo validation study on scanning precision and registration of an intraoral scan with a cone-beam computed tomography scan. Imaging science in dentistry. 2023;53(1):21–26. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220131.


Review

For citations:


Proskokova S.V., Enikeev A.M., Pirogov A.E., Kuliev R.M., Vostrikov V.O., Shcherbakov M.D. Comparative analysis of scanning techniques for edentulous jaws using the intraoral scanner. Medical alphabet. 2025;(10):90-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2025-10-90-94

Views: 125


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)