Mitomycin C in the treatment of early triple-negative locally advanced BRCA-associated breast cancer

Rationale. BRCA1 associated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is one of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer. At the same time, carcinomas that develop in carriers of BRCA1 mutations are characterized by extremely high sensitivity to DNA-damaging chemotherapy. Mitomycin C alone or in combination with platinum agents has already demonstrated promising results in the treatment of BRCA-associated ovarian cancer (OC) and metastatic breast cancer. In this article, we present the results of a retrospective study aimed at comparing standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens (NACT) with mitomycin-based regimens for primary locally advanced BRCA1-associated TNBC.

The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of the combination of mitomycin and platinum compounds during neoadjuvant therapy in patients with primary locally advanced BRCA1 – associated TNBC.

Materials and methods. The study included 89 patients diagnosed with primary locally advanced BRCA1-associated TNBC. Patients were divided into three groups depending on the therapy: 1) 4 cycles of anthracycline and cyclophosphamide followed by 12 weekly injections of paclitaxel (n = 48) (AC + T), 2) 4 cycles of anthracycline and cyclophosphamide followed by 12 weekly injections of paclitaxel and carboplatin (n = 27) (AC + TCbP), 3) mitomycin C plus platinum followed by 12 weekly injections of paclitaxel (n = 14) (MR + T). Pathological complete response (pCR) rates were compared.

Results. The pCR rate in the MP+T group was 10/14 (71%). In patients with BRCA1-associated breast cancer who received AC + T and AC + TCbP regimens as NACT, the pCR rate was 17/48 (35%) and 19/27 (70%), respectively. The difference in pCR rate between mitomycin-containing therapy and the standard AC + T regimen was statistically significant (p = 0.03); the frequency of regressions was comparable to the frequency in the AC + TCbP group. During the 20-month follow-up period, no relapses were observed in the MR + T group. Relapses were more frequent in the AC + T group compared with the AC + TCbP group (16/48 (33%) vs 1/27 (4%), p = 0.003, Fisher’s exact test). The toxicity profile of the mitomycin-containing regimen included hematologic adverse events, the most common of which were anemia and leukopenia. Compared to standard regimens, nausea was significantly less pronounced. No patients reported alopecia with this regimen.

Conclusions. The addition of mitomycin C to neoadjuvant therapy for BRCA1-associated TNBC may be a promising treatment option for this category of patients and merits further study.

1. Khosravi-Shahi P. Metastatic triple negative breast cancer: Optimizing treatment options, new and emerging targeted therapies / P. Khosravi-Shahi, L. Cabezón-Gutiérrez, S. Custodio-Cabello // Asia Pac J Clin Oncol.– 2018.– Vol.14 (1).– P. 32–39.

2. Jiang Y. Genomic and Transcriptomic Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Subtypes and Treatment Strategies / Y. Jiang, D. Ma, C. Suo, J. Shi et al. // Cancer Cell.– 2019.– Vol. 35 (3).– P. 428–440.

3. Palomba, G., Budroni, M., Olmeo, N., et al. (2014). Triple-negative breast cancer frequency and type of BRCA mutation: Clues from Sardinia. Oncology letters, 7(4), 948–952.

4. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434. doi:10.1158/1078–0432.CCR-06–3045

5. Lin NU, Claus E, Sohl J, Razzak AR, Arnaout A, Winer EP. Sites of distant recurrence and clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: high incidence of central nervous system metastases. Cancer. 2008;113(10):2638–2645. doi:10.1002/cncr.23930

6. Burness ML, Obeid EI, Olopade OI. Triple negative breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers with a complete radiologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel: a case report. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15(2): e155-e158. doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2014.08.006

7. Jwa E, Shin KH, Kim JY, et al. Locoregional Recurrence by Tumor Biology in Breast Cancer Patients after Preoperative Chemotherapy and Breast Conservation Treatment. Cancer Res Treat. 2016;48(4):1363–1372. doi:10.4143/crt.2015.456

8. Arun B, Bayraktar S, Liu DD, et al. Response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers and noncarriers: a single-institution experience. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(28):3739–3746. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.2682

9. Paluch-Shimon S., Friedman E., Berger R. et al. Neo-adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in triple-negative breast cancer among BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers // Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016. Vol. 157(1). P. 157–165.

10. Copson ER, Maishman TC, Tapper WJ, et al. Germline BRCA mutation and outcome in young-onset breast cancer (POSH): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(2):169–180. doi:10.1016/S1470–2045(17)30891–4

11. Bignon L., Fricker J., Nogues C. et al. Efficacy of anthracycline/taxanebased neo-adjuvant chemotherapy on triple-negative breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers // Breast J. 2018. Vol. 24(3). P. 269–277.

12. Weaver BA. How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25(18):2677–2681. doi:10.1091/mbc.E14–04–0916

13. Gluz O, Liedtke C, Gottschalk N, Pusztai L, Nitz U, Harbeck N. Troinoi negativnyi rak molochnoi zhelezy – tekushchee sostoianie i budushchie napravleniia. Enn Onkol. 2009 g.; 20: 1913–1927.

14. Byrski T, Huzarski T, Dent R, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115(2):359–363. doi:10.1007/s10549–008–0128–9

15. Byrski T, Gronwald J, Huzarski T, et al. Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(3):375–379. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.20.7019

16. Byrski T, Huzarski T, Dent R, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy with cisplatin in BRCA1-positive breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;115(2):359–363. doi:10.1007/s10549–008–0128–9

17. Silver DP, Richardson AL, Eklund AC, et al. Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(7):1145–1153. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4725

18. Loibl S, O’Shaughnessy J, Untch M, Sikov WM, Rugo HS, McKee MD, Huober J, Golshan M, von Minckwitz G, Maag D, Sullivan D, Wolmark N, McIntyre K, Ponce Lorenzo JJ, Metzger Filho O, Rastogi P, Symmans WF, Liu X, Geyer CE Jr. Addition of the PARP inhibitor veliparib plus carboplatin or carboplatin alone to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BrighTNess): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):497–509. doi: 10.1016/S1470–2045(18)30111–6. Epub 2018 Feb 28. PMID: 29501363.

19. Zhang J, Yao L, Liu Y, et al. Impact of the addition of carboplatin to anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival in BRCA1/2-mutated triple-negative breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2021;148(4):941–949. doi:10.1002/ijc.33234

20. Maisano R, Caristi N, Mare M, et al. Mitomycin C plus capecitabine (mixe) in anthracyclineand taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. A multicenter phase II study. Anticancer Res. 2007;27(4C):2871–2875.

21. Holánek M, Bílek O, Nenutil R, et al. Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Therapy with Platinum-Based Agents for Patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germline Mutations – A Retrospective Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients Treated at MMCI Brno. Zhodnocení účinnosti neoadjuvantní chemoterapie s platinovým derivátem u pacientek se zárodečnou mutací v genech BRCA1 a BRCA2 – retrospektivní analýza souboru pacientek s karcinomem prsu léčených v MOÚ Brno. Klin Onkol. 2019;32(Supplementum2):31–35. doi:10.14735/amko2019S31

22. Gorodnova TV, Kotiv KB, Ivantsov AO, et al. Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Therapy With Cisplatin Plus Mitomycin C in BRCA1-Mutated Ovarian Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018;28(8):1498–1506. doi:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001352

23. Gorodnova TV, Sokolenko AP, Kondratiev SV, et al. Mitomycin C plus cisplatin for systemic treatment of recurrent BRCA1-associated ovarian cancer. Invest New Drugs. 2020;38(6):1872–1878. doi:10.1007/s10637–020–00965–8