Preview

Medical alphabet

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Baseline risk, time window, and indications for delayed percutaneous coronary interventions, their significance in treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-25-7-13

Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate the significance of delayed percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), to weigh the initial mortality risk (MR) while determining the indications for their use and the time window for the use of mechanical reperfusion in late hospital admission. Total 2226 patients admitted to the Institute with STEMI for the period 2008–2017 were studied. Emergency coronary angiography was performed in 945 admitted patients in the initial 12 hours and in 834 patients after 12–72 hours of STEMI onset; PCI was performed in 784 and 619 patients, respectively. In all patients, MR was scored by TIMI; angiographic success was assessed as TIMI 3 coronary flow and compared to ECG signs of reperfusion. The baseline MR score averaged 5 or 12.5%, being corresponded to score 4.2 or 8% in patients with PCI performed in the initial 12 hours, score 5 or 12.5% in those with PCI performed after 12–72 hours, and score 6 or 16% in patients without PCI; or with respect to the patient age, MR scored 3.7 or 7%, 6 or 16%, and 7.5 or 25%, for those under the age of 65 years, those from 65–75 years, and those over 75 years old, respectively. Mortality in patients with an early and delayed PCI was 5.2% and 4.2%, respectively, and 15.6% in patients without PCI; after patient distribution by age under 65, 65–75, and over 75 years old, the respective mortality rates were 3.8%, 4.9%, and 10.8% after an early PCI; 2.6%, 5.8%, and 8.2% after a delayed PCI; and 8.4%, 19.4%, and 28% among those without PCI. For 10 years, the number of primary PCIs had increased from 39% to 78%. The ratio of early to delayed PCI made 56% to 44%. Of 195 deaths (67 patients with PCI and 128 without PCI), 90% of patients had a three-vessel disease; 83% of patients had the MI area over 30%; and the cause of death in 84% was pulmonary edema. The presented data suggest a high practical significance of delayed PCI in patients with initially high MR, its most weighty components being the age over 75 years and severe manifestations of acute heart failure (AHF). Unlike early PCIs, the delayed PCIs are used less frequently, the initial MR is not taken into account, and they are abstained from in respect to people over 75 years of age. The reduction in mortality, proportional to the baseline MR, suggests their correlation to PCI results and the feasibility of PCI use without age restrictions. The use of primary PCIs in late hospital admissions, by analogy with early ones or selectively in high MR, will help to optimize the treatment tactics and minimize mortality.

About the Authors

G. A. Gazaryan
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

Gazaryan Georgy A., DM Sci (habil.), professor, head of Scientific Dept of Urgent Cardiology with Non-Invasive Functional Diagnostic Techniques.



G. A. Nefedova
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

Nefedova Galina A., PhD Med, leading researcher at Pathological Anatomy Dept.



G. G. Gazaryan
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

Gazaryan Georgy G., PhD Med, researcher at Dept of Urgent Cardiology with Non-Invasive Functional Diagnostic Techniques



M. U. Keshtova
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

Keshtova Marianna U., cardiologist at Cardiology Dept, including for Patients with Myocardial Infarction.



L. G. Tyurina
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

Tyurina Lyalya G., physician at Ultrasound Diagnosis Dept.



I. V. Zakharov
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

Zakharov Igor V., PhD Med, leading researcher at Dept of Urgent Cardiology with Non-Invasive Functional Diagnostic Techniques.



S. Yu. Kambarov
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

 Kambarov Sergey Yu., DM Sci (habil.), head of Scientific Dept for Urgent Coronary Surgery.



K. A. Popugaev
Research Institute for Emergency Medicine n.a. N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation

Popugaev Konstantin A., DM Sci (habil.), professor of Russian Academy of Sciences, deputy director, head of Regional Vascular Centre



References

1. Janda S.P., Tan N. Thrombolysis versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarctions at Chilliwack General Hospital. Can J Cardiol. 2009; 25 (11): e382–e384. PMID: 19898701. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0828–282x(09)70165–5

2. Khubutia M. Sh., Gazaryan G.A., Zakharov I.V. Reperfusion therapy in the acute period of myocardial infarction. Moscow; 2010: 134–160.

3. Geraiely B., Nematipour E., Amirzadegan A. et al. One-Month Clinical Outcomes of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention at a High-volume Cardiac Tertiary Center: Routine Hours Versus Off-hours. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2020; 19 (1): 33–36. PMID: 31478947. https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000195

4. Jäger B., Farhan S., Kalla K. et al. One-year mortality in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Vienna STEMI registry. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015; 127 (13–14): 535–542. PMID: 26162464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508–015–0827–2

5. Buono A., Gori T. No-reflow phenomenon in acute myocardial infarction: Relieve pressure from the procedure and focus attention to the patient. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2019; 24: 100417. PMID: 31508482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2019.100417

6. Ibanez B., James S., Agewall S. et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2018; 2: 119–177. PMID: 28886621. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393

7. Morrow D., Antman E., Charlesworth A. et al. TIMI risk score for ST elevation myocardial infarction: A convenient, beside, clinical score for risk assessment at presentation: An intravenous tnPA for treatment of infracting myocardium early II trial substudy. Circulation. 2000; 102 (17): 2031–2037. PMID: 11044416. https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.102.17.2031

8. Ghazaryan G.A., Zakharov I.V. Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Russian Medical Journal. 2005. No. 3. P. 8–10.

9. Gazaryan G. A., Zakharov I. V., Chepkiy D. A., Bibkova N. M., Diagnosis and treatment of right ventricular myocardial infarction. Clinical Medicine. 2007. No. 6. Pp. 67–70.

10. Nefedova G. A., Galankina I. E. Features of thanatogenesis and the extent of myocardial infarction depending on the prevalence of atherosclerotic stenosis of the coronary arteries. Pathology Archive. 2004. No. 4. Pp. 17–20.

11. Henriques J. P., Zijlstra F., van ‘t Hof A. W. et al. Angiographic assessment of reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction by myocardial blush grade. Circulation. 2003; 107 (16): 2115–2119. PMID: 12695301. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000065221.06430.ed

12. Ghazaryan G.A. Tyurina L.G., Nefedova G.A. and others. Optimization of treatment tactics for ST segment myocardial infarction in precordial leads. Russian medical journal. 2021; (4): 339–347.

13. Gazaryan G.A., Zhizhina M.N., Kopytko Y.V. and others. Criteria for comparative assessment of the effectiveness of treatment of recurrent myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation. Medical Alphabet. 2022; 30 (4): 7–11. https://doi.org/10.33667/2078–5631–2022–30–7–11


Review

For citations:


Gazaryan G.A., Nefedova G.A., Gazaryan G.G., Keshtova M.U., Tyurina L.G., Zakharov I.V., Kambarov S.Yu., Popugaev K.A. Baseline risk, time window, and indications for delayed percutaneous coronary interventions, their significance in treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Medical alphabet. 2023;(25):7-13. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33667/2078-5631-2023-25-7-13

Views: 230


ISSN 2078-5631 (Print)
ISSN 2949-2807 (Online)