medalphabetМедицинский алфавитMedical alphabet2078-56312949-2807ООО «Альфмед»10.33667/2078-5631-2022-18-7-12medalphabet-2757Research ArticleСтатьиСовременная эндоскопическая характеристика эпителиальных новообразований толстой кишки в ходе скрининговой колоноскопииModern endoscopic characterization of colonic epithelial neoplasms during screening colonoscopyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2341-2169МаликовЯ. В.MalikovYa. V.

Маликов Ярослав Владимирович, к.м.н., врач-эндоскопист эндоскопического отделения

г. Томск

Malikov Yaroslav V., PhD Med, endoscopist at Endoscopic Dept.

 Tomsk

myv82@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3019-7831ИвановаЕ. В.IvanovaE. V.

Иванова Екатерина Викторовна, д.м.н., г.н.с. НИЛ хирургическойгастроэнтерологии и эндоскопии НИИ клинической хирургии,зав. отделением эндоскопии

Москва

Ivanova Ekaterina V., DM Sci (habil.), chief scientifc researcher at Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of Scientifc Research Institute of Clinical Surgery, head of Endoscopy Dept

 Moscow

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-7061ФедоровЕ. Д.FedorovE. D.

Федоров Евгений Дмитриевич, проф., г.н.с. НИЛ хирургическойгастроэнтерологии и эндоскопии НИИ клинической хирургии

Москва

Fedorov Evgeny D., professor, chief scientifc researcher at Research Laboratory of Surgical Gastroenterology and Endoscopy of Scientifc Research Institute of Clinical Surgery

 Moscow

ОГАУЗ «Городская клиническая больница № 3 имени Б.И. Альперовича»РоссияCity Clinical Hospital No. 3 n.a. B.I. AlperovichRussian FederationФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России; ООО «Медицинский центр „Петровские Ворота“»РоссияRussian National Research Medical University n.a. N.I. Pirogov; Medical Centre ‘Petrovsky Gates’Russian FederationФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава РоссииРоссияRussian National Research Medical University n.a. N.I. PirogovRussian Federation202224092022118Практическая гастроэнтерология (2)712Copyright © Маликов Я.В., Иванова Е.В., Федоров Е.Д., 20222022Маликов Я.В., Иванова Е.В., Федоров Е.Д.Malikov Y.V., Ivanova E.V., Fedorov E.D.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.med-alphabet.com/jour/article/view/2757

В настоящее время колоректальный рак является острой проблемой здравоохранения. Важнейшим мероприятием, направленным на снижение заболеваемости и смертности от колоректального рака, является внедрение скрининговых программ, включающих выполнение колоноскопии. Использование достижений современной эндоскопии позволяет приблизить точность оптической диагностики к гистопатологической. В обзоре представлены актуальные классификации и подходы, применяемые в Российской Федерации и за рубежом для описания и оценки эпителиальных образований толстой кишки, которые влияют на выбор оптимального метода лечения. Использование единой терминологии позволяет упростить процесс взаимодействия специалистов смежного профиля на этапах оказания медицинской помощи, тем самым повысить ее качество. Данная статья может быть полезна для врачей-эндоскопистов, гастроэнтерологов, хирургов, колопроктологов, онкологов и врачей других специальностей, как начинающих, так и с опытом работы.

Colon cancer is currently a serious public health problem. The most important action in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with colorectal cancer is the introduction of screening programs including colonoscopy. The use of modern acquired endoscopy brings the accuracy of optical diagnosis closer to that of histopathologic diagnosis. The review provides an overview of existing classifcations and approaches which are used in Russia and abroad to describe and assess colonic epithelial lesions and to choose the best treatment. The use of common terminology simplifes the process of interaction between specialists in related felds throughout the medical stages which contributes to improving quality of treatment. This article may be helpful for endoscopists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, coloproctologists, oncologists and physicians of other specialties, both beginners and experienced

колоректальный ракколоноскопияэпителиальные образованияПарижская классификацияNICE-классификацияклассификация JNET.colorectal cancercolonoscopyepithelial lesionsParis classifcationNICE classifcationJNET classifcationReferencesЗлокачественные новообразования в России в 2019 году (заболеваемость и смертность) Под ред. А.Д. Каприна, В.В. Старинского, А.О. Шахзадовой М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2020. илл. 252 с.Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2019 (incidence and mortality) Edited by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinsky, A.O. Shakhzadova. M.: P.A. Herzen Moscow State Medical Research Institute – Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution ‘NMIC of Radiology’ of the Ministry of Health of Russia, 2020. 252 p.Филимонов А.В., Захарова Н.А., Сиверская Я.В. Скрининг колоректального рака в Ханты-Мансийском автономном округе – Югре. Злокачественные опухоли. 2012; 2 (2): 37–38. https://doi.org/10.18027/2224–5057–2012–2–37–38.Filimonov A.V., Zakharova N.A., Siverskaya Ya.V. Colorectal cancer screening in Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Region – Yugra. Malignant tumors. 2012; 2 (2): 37–38. https://doi.org/10.18027/2224–5057–2012–2–37–38.Rex DK et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 112 (7): 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.174.Rex DK et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 112 (7): 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2017.174.Shaukat A et al. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021; vol. 116 (3): 458–479. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.Shaukat A et al. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021; vol. 116 (3): 458–479. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.Tanaka S et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021; 56 (4): 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535–021–01776–1.Tanaka S et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. Journal of Gastroenterology. 2021; 56 (4): 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535–021–01776–1.Winawer SJ et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1993; 329 (27): 1977–1981. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.Winawer SJ et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1993; 329 (27): 1977–1981. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312303292701.Zauber AG et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. The New England Journal of Medicin. 2012; 366 (8): 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.Zauber AG et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. The New England Journal of Medicin. 2012; 366 (8): 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100370.Lieberman David A et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143 (3): 844–857. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001.Lieberman David A et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143 (3): 844–857. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001.Клинические рекомендации. Подготовка пациентов к эндоскопическому исследованию толстой кишки. 3-е изд. М.: Российское эндоскопическое общество, 2017. 80 с. [Электронный ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://endoscopia.ru/main#libraryClinical recommendations. Bowel preparation for endoscopic examination. 3rd ed. Moscow: Russian Endoscopic Society, 2017. 80 p. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://endoscopia.ru/main#libraryHassan C et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019; 51 (8): 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0959–0505.Hassan C et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019; 51 (8): 775–794. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0959–0505.Di Palma JA et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and effcacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009; 104 (9): 2275–2284. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.389.Di Palma JA et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and effcacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2009; 104 (9): 2275–2284. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2009.389.Rex DK et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2010; 72 (2): 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1054.Rex DK et al. A randomized clinical study comparing reduced-volume oral sulfate solution with standard 4-liter sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution as preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2010; 72 (2): 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1054.Федоров Е.Д. и др. Оценка подготовки кишечника малообъемным препаратом на основе сульфатов в сравнении с макроголом: многоцентровое рандомизированное сравнительное клиническое исследование 3-й фазы. Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2019; 29 (2): 60–75. https://doi.org/10.22416/1382–4376–2019–29–2–60–75.Fedorov E.D. et al. Assessment of Bowel Preparation Using Low-Volume Sulphate-Based Preparations in Comparison with Macrogols: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study of the 3rd Phase. Russian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Coloproctology. 2019; 29 (2): 60–75. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22416/1382–4376–2019–29–2–60–75.Anastassopoulos K et al. A Comparative Study of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Following Use of Common Bowel Preparations Among a Colonoscopy Screening Population: Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2016; 61 (10): 2993–3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620–016–4214–2.Anastassopoulos K et al. A Comparative Study of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Following Use of Common Bowel Preparations Among a Colonoscopy Screening Population: Results from a Post-Marketing Observational Study. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2016; 61 (10): 2993–3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620–016–4214–2.Завьялов Д.В., Кашин С.В. Современный опыт применения трисульфата при подготовке к колоноскопии с позиции клинической безопасности. Колопроктология. 2020; 19 (4): 93–99. https://doi.org/10.33878/2073–7556–2020–19–4–93–99.Zavyalov D.V., Kashin S.V. Current practice of trisulfate applying for bowel cleansing in according to clinical safety positions. Koloproktologia. 2020; 19 (4): 93–99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073755620201949399.The Paris endoscopic classifcation of superfcial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003; 58 (6 Suppl): S3–S43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016–5107(03)02159-x.The Paris endoscopic classifcation of superfcial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2003; 58 (6 Suppl): S3–S43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016–5107(03)02159-x.Endoscopic Classifcation Review Group. Update on the Paris classifcation of superfcial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005; 37 (6): 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005–861352.Endoscopic Classifcation Review Group. Update on the Paris classifcation of superfcial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005; 37 (6): 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005–861352.Ferlitsch M et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): opean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017; 49 (3): 270–297. https://doi.org/10.1055/s0043102569.Ferlitsch M et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): opean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017; 49 (3): 270–297. https://doi.org/10.1055/s0043102569.Shaukat A et al. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020; 159 (5): 1916–1934.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.050.Shaukat A et al. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020; 159 (5): 1916–1934.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.050.Tanaka S. Morphological Description of Early GI Neoplasia. In: Chiu P.W.Y., Sano Y., Uedo N., Singh R. (eds) Endoscopy in Early Gastrointestinal Cancers, Volume 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–981–10–6769–3_2.Tanaka S. Morphological Description of Early GI Neoplasia. In: Chiu P.W.Y., Sano Y., Uedo N., Singh R. (eds) Endoscopy in Early Gastrointestinal Cancers, Volume 1. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–981–10–6769–3_2.Tanaka S et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Digestive Endoscopy. 2020; 32 (2): 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13545.Tanaka S et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Digestive Endoscopy. 2020; 32 (2): 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13545.Matsuda T et al. Macroscopic estimation of submucosal invasion in the colon. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011; 13 (1): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tgie.2011.01.004.Matsuda T et al. Macroscopic estimation of submucosal invasion in the colon. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2011; 13 (1): 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tgie.2011.01.004.WHO Classifcation of Tumours – 5th ed. Digestive System Tumours: WHO Classifcation of Tumours, Volume 1. WHO Classifcation of Tumours Editorial Board. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2019. 635 p.WHO Classifcation of Tumours – 5th ed. Digestive System Tumours: WHO Classifcation of Tumours, Volume 1. WHO Classifcation of Tumours Editorial Board. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2019. 635 p.Sano Y et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classifcation of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Digestive Endoscopy. 2016; 28 (5): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12644.Sano Y et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classifcation of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Digestive Endoscopy. 2016; 28 (5): 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12644.Kudo S et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2008; 68 (4 Suppl): S3–S47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.052.Kudo S et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2008; 68 (4 Suppl): S3–S47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.07.052.Kimura T et al. A novel pit pattern identifes the precursor of colorectal cancer derived from sessile serrated adenoma. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012; 107 (3): 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.457.Kimura T et al. A novel pit pattern identifes the precursor of colorectal cancer derived from sessile serrated adenoma. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012; 107 (3): 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.457.IJspeert JE et al. Development and validation of the WASP classifcation system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut. 2016; 65 (6): 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014–308411.IJspeert JE et al. Development and validation of the WASP classifcation system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut. 2016; 65 (6): 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2014–308411.Bustamante-Balén M et al. Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy International Open. 2021; 9 (1): E14–E21. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1293–7086.Bustamante-Balén M et al. Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population. Endoscopy International Open. 2021; 9 (1): E14–E21. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1293–7086.Sano Y et al. Effcacy of magnifying chromoendoscopy for the differential diagnosis of colorectal lesions. Digestive Endoscopy. 2005; 17 (2): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443–1661.2005.00483.x.Sano Y et al. Effcacy of magnifying chromoendoscopy for the differential diagnosis of colorectal lesions. Digestive Endoscopy. 2005; 17 (2): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443–1661.2005.00483.x.Pouw RE et al. Endoscopic tissue sampling – Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2021; 53 (12): 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1671–6336.Pouw RE et al. Endoscopic tissue sampling – Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2021; 53 (12): 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1671–6336.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.