<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">medalphabet</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Медицинский алфавит</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Medical alphabet</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2078-5631</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2949-2807</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ООО «Альфмед»</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33667/2078-5631-2020-16-58-60</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">medalphabet-1616</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Анализ безопасности выполнения одномоментной миомэктомии при кесаревом сечении</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Analysis of safety of performing simultaneous myomectomy in caesarean section</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Медведева</surname><given-names>И. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Medvedeva</surname><given-names>I. N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н., доцент</p><p>Кафедра акушерства и гинекологии факультета последипломного образования</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ноздрачева</surname><given-names>К. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Nozdracheva</surname><given-names>K. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>клинический ординатор</p><p>Кафедра акушерства и гинекологии факультета последипломного образования</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Хижняк</surname><given-names>А. Д.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Khizhnyak</surname><given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>клинический ординатор</p><p>Кафедра акушерства и гинекологии факультета последипломного образования</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБОУ ВО «Курский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Kursk State Medical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2020</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>21</day><month>09</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>16</issue><issue-title>Современная гинекология (2)</issue-title><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>60</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Медведева И.Н., Ноздрачева К.А., Хижняк А.Д., 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Медведева И.Н., Ноздрачева К.А., Хижняк А.Д.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Medvedeva I.N., Nozdracheva K.A., Khizhnyak A.D.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.med-alphabet.com/jour/article/view/1616">https://www.med-alphabet.com/jour/article/view/1616</self-uri><abstract><p>Цель исследования. Оценка безопасности расширения объема операции кесарева сечения до миомэктомии. Материалы и методы. Проведен ретроспективный анализ историй родов 44 пациенток с наличием миомы матки, которым было проведено родоразрешение путем операции кесарева сечения с расширением объема оперативного вмешательства до миомэктомии. Результаты. Средняя продолжительность операции составила 54,3 ± 23,7 минуты. Существенных интраоперационных осложнений не зарегестрировано. Средняя кровопотеря составила 661,4 ± 193,2 мл, что не выходит за рамки общепринятых границ кровопотери при проведении стандартной операции кесарева сечения. Послеоперационный период протекал без особенностей. Длительность госпитализации в среднем составила 7,0 ± 1,5 дня. Заключение. Расширение объема операции существенно не влияет наинтраоперационную кровопотерю, послеоперационные показатели гемоглобина и гематокрита крови при условии отсутствия до оперативного родоразрешения снижения данных показателей. Также критично не увеличивается время госпитализации. Послеоперационный период в основном протекает без осложнений.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The purpose of the study. Safety assessment for expansion of caesarean section to myomectomy. Materials and techniques. A retrospective analysis was conducted of the birth histories of 44 patients with uterine myoma with extension of caesarean section to myomectomy. Results. The average duration of the operation was 54.3 ± 23.7 minutes. Significant inversive complications were not registered. Average blood loss amounted to 661.4 ± 193.2 ml, that does not exceed the generally accepted blood loss limits of standard caesarean section surgery. Post-operative period was without features. The average length of hospitalization was 7.0 ± 1.5 days. Conclusion. Expansion of the operation caesarean section to myomectomy does not significantly affect intraoperative blood loss, post-operative haemoglobin and hematocrit of the blood, provided there were no reductions in these rates before operation. Hospitalization time does not increase significantly. The post-operative period primarily runs without complications.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>миома матки</kwd><kwd>кесарево сечение</kwd><kwd>миомэктомия</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>uterine myoma</kwd><kwd>caesarean section</kwd><kwd>myomectomy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сидорова И. С., Унанян А. Л., Агеев М. Б., Ведерникова Н.В., Жолобова М.Н. Современное состояние вопроса о патогенезе, клинике, диагностике и лечении миомы матки у женщин репродуктивного возраста. Акушерство. Гинекология. Репродукция. 2012; 6 (4): 22–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sidorova I. S., Unanyan A. L., Ageev M. B., Vedernikova N.V., Zholobova M.N. CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATHOGENESIS, CLINICAL FEATURES, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2012;6(4):22–23</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cooper N. P., Okolo S. Fibroids in pregnancy – common but poorly understood // Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2005. Vol. 60, No. 2. P. 132–138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cooper N. P., Okolo S. Fibroids in pregnancy – common but poorly understood // Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2005. Vol. 60, No. 2. P. 132–138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dedes I., Schäffer L., Zimmermann R., Burkhardt T., Haslinger C. Outcome and risk factors of cesarean delivery with and without cesarean myomectomy in women with uterine myomatas. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 295 (1): 27–32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dedes I., Schäffer L., Zimmermann R., Burkhardt T., Haslinger C. Outcome and risk factors of cesarean delivery with and without cesarean myomectomy in women with uterine myomatas. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 295 (1): 27–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ищенко А.И., Ботвин М.А., Ланчинский В.И. Миома матки: этиология, патогенез, диагностика, лечение. – М: Издательский дом Видар-М, 2010 – С. 6–9, 19–27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ischenko A. I., Botvin M.A., Leninskii V.I. Uterine fibroids: etiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics, treatment. M: publishing house Vidar-M, 2010. P. 6–9, 19–27.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курцер М.А., Лукашина М.В., Тищенко Е.П. Консервативная миомэктомия при кесаревом сечении // Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии.– 2008.– Т. 7, № 3.– С. 82–87.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurzer M.A., Lukashina M.V., Tishchenko E.P. Conservative myomectomy by cesarean section // Questions of gynecology, obstetrics and Perinatology. 2008. Vol. 7, No. 3. P. 82–87.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jabiry-Zieniewicz Z., Gajewska M. The pregnancy and delivery course with pregnant women with uterine myomas // Ginekol. Pol. 2002. Vol. 73, No. 4. P. 271–275.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jabiry-Zieniewicz Z., Gajewska M. The pregnancy and delivery course with pregnant women with uterine myomas // Ginekol. Pol. 2002. Vol. 73, No. 4. P. 271–275.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Song D, Zhang W, Chames MC. Myomectomy during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jun; 121 (3): 208–13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Song D, Zhang W, Chames MC. Myomectomy during cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jun; 121 (3): 208–13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Song D. Myomectomy during Cesarean Section is likely feasible. Clinics Mother Child Health. 2016; (13): 234.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Song D. Myomectomy during Cesarean Section is likely feasible. Clinics Mother Child Health. 2016; (13): 234.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zhang Y., Hua K. Patients’ age, myoma size, myoma location, and interval between myomectomy and pregnancy may influence the pregnancy rate and live birth rate after myomectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2014; 24 (2): 95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhang Y., Hua K. Patients’ age, myoma size, myoma location, and interval between myomectomy and pregnancy may influence the pregnancy rate and live birth rate after myomectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2014; 24 (2): 95.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
